Topic: [ANN][RES] RESPECTONOMY -A Decentralized Social Network - page 19. (Read 39575 times)

Can I know the truth on March 4?

What is happening here?
I am a bit confused

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/tbolt256-910810


https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/firebird2490-910910


Re firebird2490's first post on this forum above (in bold is mine; mirrors tbolt256's first post 23 minutes later), note the useless [/b] code he left in place, demonstrating that these fuckers don't have a clue as to what the fuck they're doing.



So, according to your timeline, Team RES approached experienced blockchain developers who took the time out of their busy schedule to advise anonymous dudes in Thailand about their newfangled network thingy that'll change the world prior to October 20, 2016, when the two lead devs of RES registered on this forum thanks to being encouraged by their advisory buds. Both lead devs announced minutes apart declaring their intents almost a month later on the 18th of November (their quotes depicted above).

karmaplatform.io was registered on Dec 14, 2016.
respectonomy.com was registered on Dec 15, 2016.

Thanks to a Newbie's first post on this forum inquiring about (wait till you read it), RES was Pre-PRE-ANN here ...


On Dec 28, 2016, firebird2490 declared that he was new to the cryptocurrency world but according to his own words had no trouble with gaining the support of experienced blockchain developers prior to Oct 20, 2016, when instructed by them to register on this forum so to familiarize the anonymous dudes with the platform prior to releasing RES to the world so to hopefully amass $2M during its ICO.

This thread was started on Dec 29, 2016 - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annres-respectonomy-a-decentralized-social-network-1732589 - as a PRE-ANN thanks to BitcoinTalk advisors advising them to do such oppose to an ANN.

If these supposed experienced blockchain developers of RES exists, then tell me how the fuck is it humanly possible that nary a one of them were able to address the following mundane concerns inquired by RES' lead devs:

---

Aksed on Nov 18, 2016, after supposedly already being advised by experienced blockchain developers prior to Oct 20, 2016: http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/49718/how-to-prevent-asic-mining-for-my-new-altcoin



"We are the advisors for RES, and we advised them to seek help from the BitcoinTalk forum in making their newfangled thingy go."

O Man, Glebs on their asses now, GAME OVER.   you better bring a tight asshole to these parts if you DARE to set off his scam rader, he be STRETCHING scammers all day! ;p
Your an inspiration man, sometimes is easy for me to see a scam and label it as such and move on, but your natural viral ability in how you post just lights up anythings' ass thats under it, kudos to you good sir! (they thought they could ignore me, but good luck them ignoring you!)

RIP Respectonomy , fucking garbage scam anyways

also, i hope this is a lesson to you newer guys about how most services will promote ANY scam that pays them (im talking to YOU, NewsBTC & ICOcountdown)

Crowdsales or CROWDFUNDING are fuckin illegal in Thailand. That is why Sinwattana started one and publicly displayed their vitals: https://equity.sinwattana.com/


Here's their YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCd8UqoZQpgvz_2SRsvV1wUg

To be clear once again, TEAM RES is doing everything possible to continue hiding their identities including MOTHERFUCKIN LYING AS TO WHY THEY REFUSE TO DISCLOSE SUCH!

http://eureka.bangkokbiznews.com/detail/633589


Damn Bangkok Biz News for bringing awareness to Sinwattana and all the other crowdfunding sites in Thailand to light (follow the link above). Aren't they aware that the Thailandese government has no defined laws for crowdsales-cum-crowdfunding and could at any time declare it illegal putting them all at risk?

Aside: How do you like my new sig? 

This gets funnier by the minute!

First off, is that you, Goat? Seriously, is Goat behind RES? Goat --> https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/el-cabron-44233


Let's be perfectly clear here and call a spade a spade! Your so-called advisors are nothing more than users on this forum who took the time to address your mundane concerns up to and including asking how to pen a morer betterer FAQ page that'll deem respect from the community. SERIOUSLY?

I'll get back to the advisor aspect in a subsequent post, but first (or is it third?; somebody please advise me) ...


FINALLY, you make sense! How could I be so blind? The above FULLY explains why RES' posted an image of their Thailanese Foundher, Miss Budchai, on their website AND on other platforms on the Net.



Further, the above quote by RES' explains away why they fully disclosed their vitals when registering respectonomy.com: http://respectonomy.com.hypestat.com/


Me's think that tbold256 and firebird2490 forgot to ask BitcoinTalk advisors the difference between ANONYMOUS and NOT ANONYMOUS. Or, I know that this is a motherfuckin long shot, THEY FUCKIN LIED when presenting an image of Miss Budchai AND posting vitals when registering their domain so to throw off the scent easily picked up by Thailandese police dogs:


"Captain, Rex just told me that he's tired of this shit and there's no scent of RESPECTONOMY to be found. You want me to pick you up a sack of salted bamboo worms with soy on the way back to the PD?"

BTW, your advisors forgot to tell you to use Tor AT ALL TIMES when conducting RES' business and communicating on BCT, else the Thailandese bad guys could easily get a bearing on who the fuck is behind RES', picking them up and giving them a room at the Thailand Hilton:



At least respectonomy.com is hosted in Bulgaria, home of Joshua Zipkin:

No. of IP Addresses 1
IP Address 77.104.150.121
IP Location BG
Nameservers ns1.sgp28.siteground.asia
ns2.sgp28.siteground.asia

absolutely, 2000 BTC for anonymous dev and team is very impossible!.. throw in the price of 50K sats is so damn high, who will invest from that kind of price while this project is shady. Even if we say this is legit, I would rather wait for the exchange listing than in ICO stage, coz this will dump for sure.

If you are living in country where crowdsale is on border of illlegality so your government will find you for sure. Its not important for government services that will you tell your name or not.
"Amateur" project is for 10 BTC not 2000 becouse 2000 BTC is very big amount for amateurs in country where crowdsale is not defined in law and where developer even don't know how to code a wallet.
How do you want create unique features for this coin when you get $2M? I tell you, You don't, becouse you will leave crypto world with loud laughing at the suckers.
btw: you don't need 2 million dollars for create social network.

The reason for our anonymity is due to the fact that the government of our country has no defined laws for crowdsales and could at any time declare it illegal. Disclosing our real identity puts us at risk. We are not scammers and we are not here to scam the community. We are developers of Respectonomy. We are being advised by experienced blockchain developers who wish to stay anonymous for the above mentioned reasons. Yes, we have asked questions on this forum that may not be of the level of an experienced developer, because we are not. We are amateurs. Our advisors encouraged us to use this forum to get acquainted with it and learn how it works. We are extremely grateful to those who have helped us newbies without any prejudice.

Our main reason to use a well-known escrow service is so that people on this forum and other investors will not be cheated or scammed out of their hard earned money. There may have been ICOs in the past which have scammed even the escrows, but in our case we do not have any intention of doing so. All ICO funds are under the control of Dabs and SebastianJu. The funds will only be released as per pre-set milestones, thus safeguarding investors' money.

We are here to create something that will change the way social networks are defined. A way to share thoughts and data without fear of censorship. We are not here to force anyone to part with their money, but if you do find our project interesting and would want to see it become a reality, we would appreciate your investment.

Just go around the side of this project. If this is not cheating, it is better, I'll come on an exchange.

We are currently looking into the matter. We will keep you updated

I made an investment of 0.5 bitcoins into this. I made the deposit about 3 hours ago and the transaction has 17 confirmations and I still have not received my tokens yet. Here's the transaction details from the blockchain: https://blockchain.info/address/1GQQJ2BLiXeo7sWMJNLFVW9DU6CAiVArve

Can anyone else confirm whether they've had a similar problem?

https://blockchain.info/address/3MCLbWNrFbC3iCYrmN3VhUoVkYqRLwVobn

If one makes a mistake once is forgivable.If it becomes a habit, then there is nothing you can do. On the cold earth rests have benches and multiply. A leopard cannot change its spots.

I haven't read the entire whitepaper but did scan it. It appears that Respectonomy is NOT a subjective proof of work project like Steem, but rather a conventional PoW coin that users tip content creators with... am I understanding it correctly?

No more people be scammed please, the forum is dirty and full of scammers, I feel sad about the situation. God please punish the scammer, don't let them get fund.

translation korea done cek pm sir

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-res-respectonomy-ico-6-feb-1780380

It is too early to decide on how many percent RESPECTONOMY is scam. It will show very near future, but I just decided not to invest in this kind of scam, where continuous denial, excuses and full negative.

As anyone who has seen much of prior ICOs knows, there is no way an anonymous team is going to receive 2000 Btc or close to it.

If really, really lucky they might obtain above the apparent refund threshold of 100 Btc.

Would they continue enough in that case?  There isn't much practical difference between a scam and developers just quietly abandoning a project before it becomes more than a token clone coin.

I sometimes read fanfiction and other casually authored stories.  Around 90% of them are never completed.  Almost the same happens for some crypto projects.

One of Gleb Gamow's finds is extra concerning in that context:


The concept of Respectonomy is good IMO, but it would take vast work and planning to develop, so apparently just several weeks of casual efforts and no Github code so far is not a good sign for that happening.

Personally at least, I'd need to see something more before investing.

Sorry, but you must provide more evidence when you mark anyone as a scam. Of course, no one here likes to fraud, but the only way to say that something is scam proves nothing.
you need to verify your claims otherwise and  you can be labelled as the signature spammer