Author

Topic: [ANN][RIC] Riecoin: constellations POW *CPU* HARD FORK successful, world record - page 249. (Read 685362 times)

member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
WTS  600 RIE =3.6 BTC

PM me your offer!
hero member
Activity: 781
Merit: 501
i dont think there are alot of ppl with modified miners out there, diff and blocks are opening slowly and diff isnt going wild at all, just coin is super hard to mine Cheesy

not true, with some miner with super optimized that can increase performance to 100-200% plus lot of cores can kick out all small miners out of the game...
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
i dont think there are alot of ppl with modified miners out there, diff and blocks are opening slowly and diff isnt going wild at all, just coin is super hard to mine Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 820
Merit: 1000
How to calculate network scanrate or processing power ("hashrate" does not apply: we are not hashing, we are scanning ranges of numbers in search for prime sextuplets):

scanrate = pow( diff * ln(2), 6 ) * 0.05780811 / 150

Where diff is the difficulty as shown in "getwork", currently 776
so scanrate is 9.3 TeraNumbers per second
Divide that by your total knumbers (careful with units: T vs K) per second and you get how many systems like yours would comprise the total network.

I guess 40000 i5 with 4 cores @ 2.6MHz each, or 160000 cores?

Please check the math and correct me if I'm wrong.

This is the reverse of what is calculated in riecoin_time_to_block() in scanriecoin.c in the cpuminer.

Have in mind that scanrate SHOULD ALWAYS BE COMPARED AT THE SAME DIFFICULTY. Since the scanrate decreases as difficulty increases. So it's ok for relative measurements of common difficulty, but has to be normalized if you want to compare at different prime sizes (difficulties).

If in the future we go from 9 to, say, 5 it doesn't mean the network grew or shrinked, it means nothing if values are not normalized for difficulty. Theoretical normalization for difficulty is possible but hard and would introduce errors. The easy way to do it is to actually measure in practice, relative to your PC. Like I did: currently it's about 160K cores and that's the value that's comparable in time.

That's a pretty insane number.  How does it account for those who have modded the miner with significant performance increases?  My guess is that there are a select few out there with significantly optimized miners that are mining the lions share of blocks and skewing these figures
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1134
does anybody know how many have been mined so far?
hero member
Activity: 583
Merit: 505
CTO @ Flixxo, Riecoin dev
How to calculate network scanrate or processing power ("hashrate" does not apply: we are not hashing, we are scanning ranges of numbers in search for prime sextuplets):

scanrate = pow( diff * ln(2), 6 ) * 0.05780811 / 150

Where diff is the difficulty as shown in "getwork", currently 776
so scanrate is 9.3 TeraNumbers per second
Divide that by your total knumbers (careful with units: T vs K) per second and you get how many systems like yours would comprise the total network.

I guess 40000 i5 with 4 cores @ 2.6MHz each, or 160000 cores?

Please check the math and correct me if I'm wrong.

This is the reverse of what is calculated in riecoin_time_to_block() in scanriecoin.c in the cpuminer.

Have in mind that scanrate SHOULD ALWAYS BE COMPARED AT THE SAME DIFFICULTY. Since the scanrate decreases as difficulty increases. So it's ok for relative measurements of common difficulty, but has to be normalized if you want to compare at different prime sizes (difficulties).

If in the future we go from 9 to, say, 5 it doesn't mean the network grew or shrinked, it means nothing if values are not normalized for difficulty. Theoretical normalization for difficulty is possible but hard and would introduce errors. The easy way to do it is to actually measure in practice, relative to your PC. Like I did: currently it's about 160K cores and that's the value that's comparable in time.
newbie
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
member
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
I would like to offer 50RIC for the private build of optimized rminerd version that increase perm to 80%

PM me
newbie
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
Selling 10-25-50 RIC @ 0.009 BTC each. If you are trusted, I can send small amounts first. Otherwise, we can either use trusted escrow, or we can send in small amounts with you starting. (proof: http://uploads.makevoid.com/riecoin_first_block.png)
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
If you ever get around to releasing the p2pool code, let me know.  I have a server ready to go.
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
WTS 2.69 riecoin for 27 maxcoin best price around
u send first at small increments or we use trusted escrow, u pay fees
legendary
Activity: 1713
Merit: 1029
Selling up to 500 RIC @ 0.009 BTC each. If you are trusted, I can send small amounts first. Otherwise, we can either use trusted escrow, or we can send in small amounts with you starting.
hero member
Activity: 781
Merit: 501
hi gatra,

any news on optimized miner?
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
Selling 300 Riecoin, Pm me your offer! Can sell 50 as smallest sell


Trust: -4: -1 / +0(0)
Warning: Trade with extreme caution!   Grin Grin Grin

Well, only one neg rep, you can watch what it is, it aint nothing to do with trading Smiley.  But i agree with you,
hero member
Activity: 781
Merit: 501
Selling 300 Riecoin, Pm me your offer! Can sell 50 as smallest sell


Trust: -4: -1 / +0(0)
Warning: Trade with extreme caution!   Grin Grin Grin
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
Selling 300 Riecoin, Pm me your offer! Can sell 50 as smallest sell
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
sr. member
Activity: 282
Merit: 250
WTS 600 RIE - PM with Offers. Can sell in smaller lots.
o3u
sr. member
Activity: 393
Merit: 250
Money comes, money goes
WTS 100 riecoin for 1 BTC

PM me, you send first, or escrow (which you pay.)
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
Jump to: