for localization:
frankly speaking I can get all of them translated in 1 hour.
It's because we do not encourage you to use mobile/web wallets for now.
We have not conducted well-rounded tests on these versions. Incompatible issues may occur and that's not what we would like to see.
However we must improve the existing windows client in the meantime.
When you are running the windows client, you function as a full node, whereas you are a light node running mobile/web wallets.
If you are a developer, of course you can run these wallets right now and find potential problems.
We have a bounty for securities, remember?
About web wallet, where can I find the private key file, if I generated an address in the web client.
Edit: When I click the export option in the web wallet, nothing happens.
web wallet? web wallet?
or you mean windows wallet? the place you store your wallet files.
Web wallet. What is the location of the private key file in windows?
I asked the dev.
You used a browser or a cellphone? model?
click "导出” which means export, then you should see the wif format private key
Why is it difficult to have English version of the web wallet, I think Antshares is doing this intentionally to frustrate us investors. Let them release the English version for Christ sake.
yes, coz it's unstable, could be signifcant issues that none of us could see.
usually ppl are smart enough to use these software, not smart enough to find bugs in them.
good manner when asking for these software, not so good manner when they are met with incompatible issues.
don't use them, we need time to test.
So having only one semi-functional wallet working, with the ability to support only one specific exchange - who on that team thought it would be smart to release
anything to the public? My guess - it wasn't meant for the "public", only a certain group of people that were meant to profit. This all smells like excuse after excuse. Not to mention, you told another member here they must be running a 64-bit system in order for the wallet to even run? What I'd LOVE to know is why weren't ANY of these details released while you weren't as biased about where the ICO money was coming from? Do not feed me with "unforeseen" blanket answers either. Let's break down so far what we do know for sure about this project:
1. You knew you only had one wallet which would only work with a particular system. Not all users are running 64-bit systems, many are still running on machines they pieced together with whatever parts they could.
2. You knew only one exchange would be able to support ANS
3. Apparently writing words in English in your wallet's code makes it unstable
4. Instead of sending people their ANS, you left it up to them to claim it. This is a good time to mention that submitting your private key through a form on some website somewhere to have coin sent to your public key is about as ridiculous as it gets. If people lose their keys, that's on them. Holding people's funds back until they come to "claim it" which is what was effectively done by sending you BTC - is on you.
I question this project for many reasons. I question the very core ability it's sold many on which is "many blockchains interacting". What you have done is used people's names to gain trust and then pulled a bait and switch (promised one thing, delivered another). The names you claim are involved in this project have a history and reputation that follows as being very intelligent, connected to the community, and trustworthy. So far all that has been displayed is anything but that. What "wise team of businessmen" thought it would be a good strategy to execute in the fashion you have? What developers could say with pride "we should release this wallet"? Lastly, who there thought people wouldn't see through this immediately once they realized what was truly going on?
This is yet another punch to the gut in crypto. Yet another scam to enable a select group of people to profit, while others sit and wait with hope. You have bugs you feel are that complicated that it's holding progress back? People are often wise enough to run it but not debug it? Agreed. Send me your code, I'll send you the bill after I've fixed it. I'm not one to express such disdain for a project or go out of character seemingly off-the-handle as I have, but I'm really getting fed up with this.