Topic: [ANN][rICO]Antshares Blockchain Mainnet is ONLINE! - page 194. (Read 1300578 times)

ANS trading now is only in chinnese exchange, i hope bittrex and poloniex will added ANS, i have try to trading in yunbi but i'm more comfort trading on poloniex or bittrex

Two year hold is a long time. Dump time! LOLZ.

1) Why wasn't distribution just handled when the chain went live.  I've done many coin swaps and distributions and it's as simple as sending from the wallet that holds the funds, to the public keys.  There's nothing to verify, it's a matter of people are owed what they are.  Holding back those funds selectively in the wallet does nothing more than raise suspicion.  This is coming from an investor who has already received their ANS, mind you, so my post is completely unbiased and not fueled by emotion.

2) In my opinion, these people executed the work in the timeframes and fashions promised - they should already be compensated.

3) EN localization shouldn't depend on a development plan.  The Chinese wallets were released and they didn't have to wait on any development plan.  It's as simple as translating one language to another.  If you're able to write these posts in English, I'm sure you can translate wallet information and phrases like "Send ANS" "Receive ANS" and so forth or have someone capable on the team.

What's even more disheartening is that as per the usual, a great deal of effort and energy went into fielding questions during the ICO phase and before the production chain went live.  There was a great amount of convincing and upbeat conversations to get people to send you their coin.  However, what we're basically facing now is pretty ridiculous.  It's strange that there's quite a surplus of ANS available for sale on one Chinese exchange, yet there's apparently quite a hold-back of funds that those who participated and supported your ICO have yet to receive.

Furthermore, many exchange operations aren't running windows (with very few exceptions) and the few that are from what I can tell so far by this wallet release - wouldn't really have an easy time supporting ANS on their exchange as there's little to no documentation made available.  If I had to guess, you've been planning this with yunbi for quite some time to ease support for ANS into their existing infrastructure.  This is a very transparently biased situation favoring only Chinese investors and/or participants in one fashion or another and it's beyond shameful.  As it stands right now on this single exchange, the price is down considerably from where most bought into the ICO at.

I've tried to keep somewhat of a positive attitude towards this but everything so far is pointing in a negative direction and I'm really not liking what I'm seeing here.

Newly generated? We should generate new adress in wallet or so?

The monkey survey really didn't mention those who created blog post for bounties, how can we claim them?
I think there are about 2 people who already asked this before. can you update us about this please.

Antshares first should improve its wallet and full translate block explorer...

no worries guys.
regarding your questions:
1) currently still 18 M ANS pending to be distributed, seed ppl+ico1+ico2+bounties all mixed.
2) bounty ppl should use the newly generated ANS address to update the google doc (no need for those who have already been issued bounties), check sub-op. Bounties will be distributed very soon.
3) web/mobile app wallets are ready to download, but the EN localization takes a longer time due to our development plan.

I have followed what blog says how to claim ANS but why doesnt win wallet doesnt show balance?

Got my coin thank you.

Got my like 2 days ago, people not recieve maybe bottom of the rich list lol
0.05 btc. ....0.1 btc?
Got to wait people

Same here. The balance still from ICO. Please give as an update about the bounty so that we don't need to post repeatedly like this.

Thanks anyway Antshare Devs!

When can we get bounty?

twoturtles, unfortunately I have to completely agree with you.

I had mine for breakfast, not lunch.

If you are wondering if antshares launched already, yes, more or less so.

We knew that there would be preferential treatment with regard to the Chinese exchanges going live first - the Antshares team made that clear.  However, after such a large ICO combined with the lack of responsiveness, limited choice in wallet (which to me isn't an issue but to most could be), lack of readily-available English translations (there are more than just Chinese investors involved here, afterall), and groups of folks left with unanswered questions - it's not really leaving me with a pleasant taste in my mouth.  It's a bit alarming.  The launch could have waited a few weeks to handle some of the aforementioned details to ensure a smoother release.  For me at least, one of the strangest details (and I stress this is just in my eyes) is that the source/Linux wallet isn't ready and a Windows version is.  If anything in my experience, it's typically the opposite.  Again though in fairness, we're dealing with what seems to be a wallet developed in an MS environment which needs some porting to work outside of it.  I'm keeping an open mind and hoping the communication channels open up sooner rather than later.

its the ICO round 1 2015 ANS is my guess. Remember they paid around only 18k sat for theirs, hence the price reflecting on their exchange (round 2 was closer to 28k)
Us round 2 investor will see OUR profit on the Antshares platform itself, and ONLY once the round one coins are chewed on it looks like :/
research will tell you how many ICO round 1 coins there are, it has all been covered in this thread i believe as well

tho, once it sees major western exchanges good volume should carry us further
Remember: Theres a reason China's largest personal holder of BTC invested 1000BTC into ROUND 2    (tho he may have in round 1 as well)

Really have to agree with you. The amount of ANS currently being traded at chinese exchanges while I have not even received my ANS yet does bother me.

When antshare be ready for lunch at all?