Edit: Sold
Topic: [ANN][RVD]RVDCoin-Secure CPU only cryptographic coin - page 5. (Read 24453 times)
Edit: Sold
The dev didn't even bother to change the P2P_PREFIX from Quark, saweet.
dont worry about that, is quark but lion version and NOT premined
The dev didn't even bother to change the P2P_PREFIX from Quark, saweet.
[WTS] 100K RVD @ 1 BTC
PM me if interested!
PM me if interested!
the website is in development, with another thinks like mac version.
this post is created before the web becouse if isn't the ppl says, "eehh this coin is premined! this is a junkcoin!", no, when i started mining, this coin was for the block 24.
now this is the info:
{
"blocks" : 6411,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 158.64887611,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
this post is created before the web becouse if isn't the ppl says, "eehh this coin is premined! this is a junkcoin!", no, when i started mining, this coin was for the block 24.
now this is the info:
{
"blocks" : 6411,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 158.64887611,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
How many years to mine all coins?
The website requires flash. I don't get good vibes about this.
The website requires flash. I don't get good vibes about this.
For me it just shows a godaddy buy this domain page, if you mean the website linked on the main post.
Since the company he originally claimed as the exchange he was getting started is a forex company who had no knowledge of this coins existence and the fact the creator hasn't responded to renaming or even admitted that he was pretending to be affiliated seems to be pointing to this being a coin to forget about.
How many years to mine all coins?
The website requires flash. I don't get good vibes about this.
The website requires flash. I don't get good vibes about this.
If someone does not want, give me please
RMgVcZWprtxEtSC2sFEy4VqWSFs57jEMhs
RMgVcZWprtxEtSC2sFEy4VqWSFs57jEMhs
It would be encouraging for the dev to post anything,
I would tend to agree with you BUT on the other end if I was the dev I might also hold off while so much flaming is taking place and just let the product speak for itself a tad as not to have to engage in arguments and completely derail and taint my ANN thread. At least until things die down a little.
I suggest we just give things a little time to reveal themselves and remain open minded and neutral.
difficulty is so high to mine solo, please add a pool soon!!
dont waste your time "finding" a block :s
It would be encouraging for the dev to post anything,
I would tend to agree with you BUT on the other end if I was the dev I might also hold off while so much flaming is taking place and just let the product speak for itself a tad as not to have to engage in arguments and completely derail and taint my ANN thread. At least until things die down a little.
I suggest we just give things a little time to reveal themselves and remain open minded and neutral.
It would be encouraging for the dev to post anything,
Finally I was able to connect with this rvdcoin.conf file:
Code:
server=1
daemon=1
gen=1
rpcthreads=80
rpcallowip=*
rpcuser=testuser
rpcpassword=123
rpcport=12132
addnode=209.126.71.68:12131
addnode=37.146.189.117:12131
addnode=113.140.43.130:12131
addnode=117.21.226.240:12131
addnode=1.82.228.225
addnode=182.237.2.112
addnode=93.80.183.243
addnode=113.200.251.30
addnode=178.74.110.238
addnode=80.200.61.60
addnode=113.200.251.26
addnode=178.74.110.238
addnode=113.200.251.25
addnode=89.187.229.86
addnode=113.200.251.27
addnode=54.201.103.54
addnode=113.200.251.248
addnode=209.126.71.68
addnode=37.146.189.117
addnode=113.140.43.130
addnode=117.21.226.240
addnode=119.178.230.186
addnode=119.178.230.186:12131
addnode=78.144.231.12:58312
addnode=178.74.110.238:49266
addnode=89.187.229.86:52009
addnode=113.200.251.204:58174
addnode=1.82.228.225
addnode=216.218.197.210
addnode=182.237.2.112
addnode=1.82.228.225
addnode=182.237.2.112
addnode=113.200.251.207
addnode=113.200.251.208
addnode=113.240.83.53
addnode=113.240.83.53
addnode=113.200.251.204
addnode=113.200.251.206
addnode=113.200.251.205
addnode=113.200.251.201
addnode=113.200.251.203
addnode=113.200.251.202
addnode=113.200.251.200
addnode=113.200.251.198
addnode=113.200.251.199
addnode=113.200.251.197
addnode=113.200.251.196
addnode=113.200.251.194
addnode=113.200.251.249
addnode=113.200.251.195
addnode=113.200.251.248
addnode=113.200.251.247
addnode=113.200.251.245
addnode=113.200.251.246
addnode=113.200.251.242
addnode=113.200.251.244
addnode=221.11.62.57
addnode=113.200.251.243
addnode=221.11.62.56
addnode=221.11.62.55
addnode=221.11.62.52
addnode=221.11.62.51
addnode=221.11.62.54
addnode=221.11.62.53
addnode=221.11.62.50
addnode=221.11.62.46
addnode=221.11.62.47
addnode=221.11.62.49
addnode=221.11.62.45
addnode=221.11.62.48
addnode=113.200.251.46
addnode=221.11.62.43
addnode=221.11.62.42
addnode=12.53.175.2
addnode=113.200.251.45
addnode=113.200.251.44
addnode=212.179.64.66
addnode=113.200.251.43
addnode=212.179.64.66
addnode=113.200.251.42
addnode=207.245.41.195
addnode=202.198.62.133
addnode=93.89.117.211
addnode=113.200.251.40
addnode=113.200.251.42
addnode=212.179.64.66
addnode=176.199.12.216
addnode=207.245.41.195
addnode=108.35.124.225
addnode=207.245.41.195
addnode=176.199.12.216
addnode=93.89.117.211
addnode=54.221.101.247
addnode=207.245.41.195
addnode=213.179.245.156
addnode=207.245.41.195
addnode=84.27.208.101
addnode=113.200.251.39
addnode=93.85.189.66
addnode=207.245.41.195
addnode=113.200.251.38
addnode=54.205.141.207
addnode=213.230.73.101
addnode=207.245.41.195
addnode=94.208.67.92
addnode=207.245.41.195
addnode=95.27.239.101
addnode=207.245.41.195
addnode=207.245.41.195
addnode=113.200.251.28
addnode=113.200.251.29
addnode=50.201.141.6
addnode=207.245.41.195
addnode=113.200.251.34
addnode=77.235.137.242
addnode=207.245.41.195
addnode=54.200.248.80
addnode=207.245.41.195
addnode=113.200.251.36
addnode=113.200.251.35
addnode=113.200.251.35
addnode=65.39.150.60
addnode=93.80.183.243
addnode=113.200.251.30
addnode=178.74.110.238
addnode=80.200.61.60
addnode=113.200.251.26
addnode=178.74.110.238
addnode=113.200.251.25
addnode=89.187.229.86
addnode=113.200.251.27
addnode=54.201.103.54
Everyone's a skeptic here when dealing with alt coins for good reason but let's please not post speculation. That's not fair for anyone. If someone has factual information that's great but speculating with pessimism is only damaging and until there's some solid information that points undoubtedly one way or another you should keep it out of public threads.
I think that should go for the optimists as well. Keeping to the facts helps the community make informed decisions about how involved to get in to this coin and if it's a waste of time or not.
I think that should go for the optimists as well. Keeping to the facts helps the community make informed decisions about how involved to get in to this coin and if it's a waste of time or not.
Rvd markets consider this fraud.. an official statement coming soon.
well, another cpu's 12 hours lost.
The guy appears to not even own the site he lists and he didn't sell anything for money so not sure what they could actually do about it.
Anyway if another dev took over the coin and changed the name + logo that would be best. Otherwise this is dead.
Soon we will have such a lot threads like this that I don't know.. maybe should it be banned at the begining?
How would they pick ban criteria? You wouldn't want to accidently ban a good coin.
+1
That is the question. I don't know the answer yet. But starting from "hello it is a fork of already existed coin with one little change" should be the start.
Then you have the issue where a coin like Quark is getting lots of hate for it being mined so fast. A version of it that is mined slower is a small change but many people would go for that.
I understand that but for example Nxt. Lots of people say Nxt is so nice concept etc but do you know that at the begining 73 people (donators) owned all 1 billion coins? So distribution is done by buying it from them for their prices. And is it fair this time?
I hate the whole idea behind NXT. But apparently 73 members of the community didn't and I am sure they have sold many of the coin to even more people. While I don't like the idea it doesn't mean it should be banned.
I didn't say it should be banned. I just compared fast mining to this.
OK don't create offtopic here
Couse we still bumping this thread up... Rvd markets consider this fraud.. an official statement coming soon.
well, another cpu's 12 hours lost.
The guy appears to not even own the site he lists and he didn't sell anything for money so not sure what they could actually do about it.
Anyway if another dev took over the coin and changed the name + logo that would be best. Otherwise this is dead.
Soon we will have such a lot threads like this that I don't know.. maybe should it be banned at the begining?
How would they pick ban criteria? You wouldn't want to accidently ban a good coin.
+1
That is the question. I don't know the answer yet. But starting from "hello it is a fork of already existed coin with one little change" should be the start.
Then you have the issue where a coin like Quark is getting lots of hate for it being mined so fast. A version of it that is mined slower is a small change but many people would go for that.
I understand that but for example Nxt. Lots of people say Nxt is so nice concept etc but do you know that at the begining 73 people (donators) owned all 1 billion coins? So distribution is done by buying it from them for their prices. And is it fair this time?
I hate the whole idea behind NXT. But apparently 73 members of the community didn't and I am sure they have sold many of the coin to even more people. While I don't like the idea it doesn't mean it should be banned.
Rvd markets consider this fraud.. an official statement coming soon.
well, another cpu's 12 hours lost.
The guy appears to not even own the site he lists and he didn't sell anything for money so not sure what they could actually do about it.
Anyway if another dev took over the coin and changed the name + logo that would be best. Otherwise this is dead.
Soon we will have such a lot threads like this that I don't know.. maybe should it be banned at the begining?
How would they pick ban criteria? You wouldn't want to accidently ban a good coin.
+1
That is the question. I don't know the answer yet. But starting from "hello it is a fork of already existed coin with one little change" should be the start.
Then you have the issue where a coin like Quark is getting lots of hate for it being mined so fast. A version of it that is mined slower is a small change but many people would go for that.
I understand that but for example Nxt. Lots of people say Nxt is so nice concept etc but do you know that at the begining 73 people (donators) owned all 1 billion coins? So distribution is done by buying it from them for their prices. And is it fair this time?
Rvd markets consider this fraud.. an official statement coming soon.
well, another cpu's 12 hours lost.
The guy appears to not even own the site he lists and he didn't sell anything for money so not sure what they could actually do about it.
Anyway if another dev took over the coin and changed the name + logo that would be best. Otherwise this is dead.
Soon we will have such a lot threads like this that I don't know.. maybe should it be banned at the begining?
How would they pick ban criteria? You wouldn't want to accidently ban a good coin.
+1
That is the question. I don't know the answer yet. But starting from "hello it is a fork of already existed coin with one little change" should be the start.
Then you have the issue where a coin like Quark is getting lots of hate for it being mined so fast. A version of it that is mined slower is a small change but many people would go for that.
Rvd markets consider this fraud.. an official statement coming soon.
well, another cpu's 12 hours lost.
The guy appears to not even own the site he lists and he didn't sell anything for money so not sure what they could actually do about it.
Anyway if another dev took over the coin and changed the name + logo that would be best. Otherwise this is dead.
Soon we will have such a lot threads like this that I don't know.. maybe should it be banned at the begining?
How would they pick ban criteria? You wouldn't want to accidently ban a good coin.
+1
That is the question. I don't know the answer yet. But starting from "hello it is a fork of already existed coin with one little change" should be the start.
Rvd markets consider this fraud.. an official statement coming soon.
well, another cpu's 12 hours lost.
The guy appears to not even own the site he lists and he didn't sell anything for money so not sure what they could actually do about it.
Anyway if another dev took over the coin and changed the name + logo that would be best. Otherwise this is dead.
Soon we will have such a lot threads like this that I don't know.. maybe should it be banned at the begining?
How would they pick ban criteria? You wouldn't want to accidently ban a good coin.
+1
Rvd markets consider this fraud.. an official statement coming soon.
well, another cpu's 12 hours lost.
The guy appears to not even own the site he lists and he didn't sell anything for money so not sure what they could actually do about it.
Anyway if another dev took over the coin and changed the name + logo that would be best. Otherwise this is dead.
Soon we will have such a lot threads like this that I don't know.. maybe should it be banned at the begining?
How would they pick ban criteria? You wouldn't want to accidently ban a good coin.
Jump to: