[ANN][SDC] ShadowCoin | ShadowChat [EM] | ShadowSend [Anon] | ShadowGo [Mobile] - page 73.

ItsNotMe

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Quote from: svojoe on August 02, 2014, 11:57:13 AM

I don't care about where the code-base originates from. Everything we do is a based on distant BTC code at some point... Who cares? I just want innovation which it looks like I am getting.

SDCdev wrote the code...SDCdev is Rynomster. He is one of the most capable devs in any altcoin. The guy is genius level...

svojoe

legendary

Activity: 968

Merit: 1000

einc.io

I don't care about where the code-base originates from. Everything we do is a based on distant BTC code at some point... Who cares? I just want innovation which it looks like I am getting.

lekiller

newbie

Activity: 48

Merit: 0

Quote from: valkir on August 02, 2014, 11:54:41 AM

Come on suchnekky ! Stop trying to fud. You just miss the train sorry buddy! You should get in now instead!

+1

You mad bro ?

valkir

legendary

Activity: 1484

Merit: 1004

Come on suchnekky ! Stop trying to fud. You just miss the train sorry buddy! You should get in now insteed!

00Smurf

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: Honeypot on August 02, 2014, 11:51:32 AM

Quote from: sdcoin on August 02, 2014, 11:45:50 AM

Quote from: suchnekky on August 02, 2014, 11:37:36 AM

this has already been addressed

Quote from: Honeypot on August 01, 2014, 11:21:24 AM

The coin is reaching new heights and is currently undergoing a healthy correction. The 8 btc sell wall buy eaten few hours ago after being posted for a few hours.

The coin delivers. It's contents are based off of proven tech upgrades, improved even more by the dev. Most importantly, in the time when most coins are all promises and no delivery, this coin among very few others deliver consistent results.

How many coins are based off of proven btc and ltc technology alone? There is no such thing as development without learning from examples of past projects. For a coin that is barely 1.5 weeks old, market is showing us that shadow coin is gathering investor confidence all around.

3 factors necessary for a crypto to succeed: Public and community support, dedicated and diligent dev with innovative ideas, and combined financial support from all sources interested in power. Check out the dev delivery results so far, the internet public and market interest, and buy support on the exchanges.

All 3 conditions are met. This coin can easily break top 10 marketcap.

This has been addressed to death already.

Well said well said.

red5standingby

full member

Activity: 174

Merit: 100

Quote from: 00Smurf on August 02, 2014, 11:50:04 AM

Quote from: keshuker on August 02, 2014, 11:49:17 AM

Still waiting anxiously for the news ANN

I hope it will get the next leg up to 50ksat

its coming.

I can't wait. Shadow rules!

1024KB

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Quote from: sdcoin on August 02, 2014, 11:45:50 AM

Quote from: suchnekky on August 02, 2014, 11:37:36 AM

this has already been addressed

Quote from: rynomster on August 01, 2014, 05:19:41 PM

Quote from: sdcoin on August 01, 2014, 05:18:57 PM

The code and WP appear similar because it was my team wrote the code and WP for Cinni. I was not the original developer of CinniCoin, I just built the encrypted messaging system.

My team and I decided to create the ShadowCoin project so we would have the freedom to implement our innovations as we saw best. I can assure you that the ShadowChat EM system is much improved from the original EM system that we developed for Cinni.

Here is a list of improvements that ShadowChat EM has over the EM system we developed for Cinni:

Instant Messaging UI
Conversation Grouping
Single Database - uses levelDB instead of berkeleyDB
More efficient
BBCode (coming soon) and rich text display

I can confirm that I am sdcoin / SDCDev / lead developer of ShadowCoin

I have already addressed this. See above.

Already addressed dude, read up yo

Honeypot

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

Quote from: sdcoin on August 02, 2014, 11:45:50 AM

Quote from: suchnekky on August 02, 2014, 11:37:36 AM

this has already been addressed

Quote from: rynomster on August 01, 2014, 05:19:41 PM

Quote from: sdcoin on August 01, 2014, 05:18:57 PM

The code and WP appear similar because it was my team wrote the code and WP for Cinni. I was not the original developer of CinniCoin, I just built the encrypted messaging system.

My team and I decided to create the ShadowCoin project so we would have the freedom to implement our innovations as we saw best. I can assure you that the ShadowChat EM system is much improved from the original EM system that we developed for Cinni.

Here is a list of improvements that ShadowChat EM has over the EM system we developed for Cinni:

Instant Messaging UI
Conversation Grouping
Single Database - uses levelDB instead of berkeleyDB
More efficient
BBCode (coming soon) and rich text display

I can confirm that I am sdcoin / SDCDev / lead developer of ShadowCoin

I have already addressed this. See above.

Quote from: Honeypot on August 01, 2014, 11:21:24 AM

The coin is reaching new heights and is currently undergoing a healthy correction. The 8 btc sell wall buy eaten few hours ago after being posted for a few hours.

The coin delivers. It's contents are based off of proven tech upgrades, improved even more by the dev. Most importantly, in the time when most coins are all promises and no delivery, this coin among very few others deliver consistent results.

How many coins are based off of proven btc and ltc technology alone? There is no such thing as development without learning from examples of past projects. For a coin that is barely 1.5 weeks old, market is showing us that shadow coin is gathering investor confidence all around.

3 factors necessary for a crypto to succeed: Public and community support, dedicated and diligent dev with innovative ideas, and combined financial support from all sources interested in power. Check out the dev delivery results so far, the internet public and market interest, and buy support on the exchanges.

All 3 conditions are met. This coin can easily break top 10 marketcap.

This has been addressed to death already.

00Smurf

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: keshuker on August 02, 2014, 11:49:17 AM

Still waiting anxiously for the news ANN

I hope it will get the next leg up to 50ksat

its coming.

ItsNotMe

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Quote from: suchnekky on August 02, 2014, 11:37:36 AM

Quote from: Frigga77 on August 01, 2014, 03:03:21 PM

Quote from: Frigga77 on August 01, 2014, 10:14:33 AM

I did a little research on the p2p EM system that Shadowcoin has implemented, because if was thinking of investing. I will not invest because:

It seems that it is not that new, and was already implemented in Cinnicoin, before it was implemented in Shadowcoin. Take a look at this screenshot, you can see it uses the same commands and same type of interface:

Also the whitepaper has many parts literally copied from the Cinnicoin whitepaper, look at the parts about encryption and decryption and the references (which they scrambled):

Cinnicoin: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10793660/wp.pdf

Shadowcoin (whitepaper in OP):
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annsdc-shadowcoin-shadowchat-em-shadowsend-anon-shadowgo-mobile-700087

See for yourself if you want to do something with this or not, but I am not investing in a copycat coin.

Also:Take a look at
https://github.com/Cinnicoin/CinniCoin/blob/master/src/emessage.cpp
https://github.com/Cinnicoin/CinniCoin/blob/master/src/emessage.h
https://github.com/Cinnicoin/CinniCoin/blob/master/src/emessageclass.h

compare it to:
https://github.com/SDCDev/shadowcoin/blob/master/src/smessage.cpp
https://github.com/SDCDev/shadowcoin/blob/master/src/smessage.h

This is supposed to be the code for the P2P EM System.
Please tell me what is the difference, apart from some objectclasses that CinniCoin has put in emessageclass.h and shadowcoin has put in smessage.h (which is only a way to put some programlines in another place, the lines are the same) and some minor changes in smessage.cpp versus emessage.cpp.

HaHa fudMan...you did not see that the Rynomster is the dev of ShadowCoin...kiss this! Kiss

00Smurf

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: suchnekky on August 02, 2014, 11:37:36 AM

This is supposed to be the code for the P2P EM System.
Please tell me what is the difference, apart from some objectclasses that CinniCoin has put in emessageclass.h and shadowcoin has put in smessage.h (which is only a way to put some programlines in another place, the lines are the same) and some minor changes in smessage.cpp versus emessage.cpp.

[/quote]

Read page 24.

keshuker

sr. member

Activity: 395

Merit: 250

aka. dibdab

Still waiting anxiously for the news ANN

I hope it will get the next leg up to 50ksat

chnchapters

member

Activity: 106

Merit: 10

Quote from: suchnekky on August 02, 2014, 11:37:36 AM

Quote from: Frigga77 on August 01, 2014, 03:03:21 PM

Quote from: Frigga77 on August 01, 2014, 10:14:33 AM

I did a little research on the p2p EM system that Shadowcoin has implemented, because if was thinking of investing. I will not invest because:

It seems that it is not that new, and was already implemented in Cinnicoin, before it was implemented in Shadowcoin. Take a look at this screenshot, you can see it uses the same commands and same type of interface:

Also the whitepaper has many parts literally copied from the Cinnicoin whitepaper, look at the parts about encryption and decryption and the references (which they scrambled):

Cinnicoin: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10793660/wp.pdf

Shadowcoin (whitepaper in OP):
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annsdc-shadowcoin-shadowchat-em-shadowsend-anon-shadowgo-mobile-700087

See for yourself if you want to do something with this or not, but I am not investing in a copycat coin.

Also:Take a look at
https://github.com/Cinnicoin/CinniCoin/blob/master/src/emessage.cpp
https://github.com/Cinnicoin/CinniCoin/blob/master/src/emessage.h
https://github.com/Cinnicoin/CinniCoin/blob/master/src/emessageclass.h

compare it to:
https://github.com/SDCDev/shadowcoin/blob/master/src/smessage.cpp
https://github.com/SDCDev/shadowcoin/blob/master/src/smessage.h

This is supposed to be the code for the P2P EM System.
Please tell me what is the difference, apart from some objectclasses that CinniCoin has put in emessageclass.h and shadowcoin has put in smessage.h (which is only a way to put some programlines in another place, the lines are the same) and some minor changes in smessage.cpp versus emessage.cpp.

Try reading before you post genious... This is already been addressed multiple times. It was actually good news.

00Smurf

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: suchnekky on August 02, 2014, 11:37:36 AM

Quote from: Frigga77 on August 01, 2014, 03:03:21 PM

Quote from: Frigga77 on August 01, 2014, 10:14:33 AM

I did a little research on the p2p EM system that Shadowcoin has implemented, because if was thinking of investing. I will not invest because:

It seems that it is not that new, and was already implemented in Cinnicoin, before it was implemented in Shadowcoin. Take a look at this screenshot, you can see it uses the same commands and same type of interface:

Also the whitepaper has many parts literally copied from the Cinnicoin whitepaper, look at the parts about encryption and decryption and the references (which they scrambled):

Cinnicoin: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10793660/wp.pdf

Shadowcoin (whitepaper in OP):
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annsdc-shadowcoin-shadowchat-em-shadowsend-anon-shadowgo-mobile-700087

See for yourself if you want to do something with this or not, but I am not investing in a copycat coin.

Also:Take a look at
https://github.com/Cinnicoin/CinniCoin/blob/master/src/emessage.cpp
https://github.com/Cinnicoin/CinniCoin/blob/master/src/emessage.h
https://github.com/Cinnicoin/CinniCoin/blob/master/src/emessageclass.h

compare it to:
https://github.com/SDCDev/shadowcoin/blob/master/src/smessage.cpp
https://github.com/SDCDev/shadowcoin/blob/master/src/smessage.h

This is supposed to be the code for the P2P EM System.
Please tell me what is the difference, apart from some objectclasses that CinniCoin has put in emessageclass.h and shadowcoin has put in smessage.h (which is only a way to put some programlines in another place, the lines are the same) and some minor changes in smessage.cpp versus emessage.cpp.

This was already addressed. Perhaps you should read some of the pages before you posting extraneous BS.

sdcoin

full member

Activity: 129

Merit: 100

Leave nothing but a shadow.

Quote from: suchnekky on August 02, 2014, 11:37:36 AM

this has already been addressed

Quote from: rynomster on August 01, 2014, 05:19:41 PM

Quote from: sdcoin on August 01, 2014, 05:18:57 PM

The code and WP appear similar because it was my team wrote the code and WP for Cinni. I was not the original developer of CinniCoin, I just built the encrypted messaging system.

My team and I decided to create the ShadowCoin project so we would have the freedom to implement our innovations as we saw best. I can assure you that the ShadowChat EM system is much improved from the original EM system that we developed for Cinni.

Here is a list of improvements that ShadowChat EM has over the EM system we developed for Cinni:

Instant Messaging UI
Conversation Grouping
Single Database - uses levelDB instead of berkeleyDB
More efficient
BBCode (coming soon) and rich text display

I can confirm that I am sdcoin / SDCDev / lead developer of ShadowCoin

I have already addressed this. See above.

suchnekky

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

Quote from: Frigga77 on August 01, 2014, 03:03:21 PM

Quote from: Frigga77 on August 01, 2014, 10:14:33 AM

I did a little research on the p2p EM system that Shadowcoin has implemented, because if was thinking of investing. I will not invest because:

It seems that it is not that new, and was already implemented in Cinnicoin, before it was implemented in Shadowcoin. Take a look at this screenshot, you can see it uses the same commands and same type of interface:

Also the whitepaper has many parts literally copied from the Cinnicoin whitepaper, look at the parts about encryption and decryption and the references (which they scrambled):

Cinnicoin: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10793660/wp.pdf

Shadowcoin (whitepaper in OP):
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annsdc-shadowcoin-shadowchat-em-shadowsend-anon-shadowgo-mobile-700087

See for yourself if you want to do something with this or not, but I am not investing in a copycat coin.

Also:Take a look at
https://github.com/Cinnicoin/CinniCoin/blob/master/src/emessage.cpp
https://github.com/Cinnicoin/CinniCoin/blob/master/src/emessage.h
https://github.com/Cinnicoin/CinniCoin/blob/master/src/emessageclass.h

compare it to:
https://github.com/SDCDev/shadowcoin/blob/master/src/smessage.cpp
https://github.com/SDCDev/shadowcoin/blob/master/src/smessage.h

This is supposed to be the code for the P2P EM System.
Please tell me what is the difference, apart from some objectclasses that CinniCoin has put in emessageclass.h and shadowcoin has put in smessage.h (which is only a way to put some programlines in another place, the lines are the same) and some minor changes in smessage.cpp versus emessage.cpp.

00Smurf

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: olloman on August 02, 2014, 09:56:07 AM

I've been into XC since the beginning and still am, I have been following SDC for the past week and I have to say that Shadowcoin looks a lot like XC in the early days, because of the style of the development, the community and the slow but steady upward trend, I hope it will actually follow XC's path

I see the parallel as well.

RW-Stott

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Quote from: jioy on August 02, 2014, 10:13:17 AM

is it sold on the bittrex?

yes

https://bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-SDC

jioy

hero member

Activity: 574

Merit: 500

is it sold on the bittrex?

olloman

sr. member

Activity: 433

Merit: 250

Crypto Angel

I've been into XC since the beginning and still am, I have been following SDC for the past week and I have to say that Shadowcoin looks a lot like XC in the early days, because of the style of the development, the community and the slow but steady upward trend, I hope it will actually follow XC's path

Topic: [ANN][SDC] ShadowCoin | ShadowChat [EM] | ShadowSend [Anon] | ShadowGo [Mobile] - page 73. (Read 172603 times)