Semus doesn't have a high tps. It's slow. Algorand (which is live), ETH 2.0 (which isn't yet) or Thundercore (which is live) are 1000 times faster than Semux. In addition to this, any BFT consensus is fairly centralized and use 33 to 100 nodes while the above are completely decentralized. The only thing Semux has is its community aproach, which is good, but might not be enough to attract builders. The team need and the community need to face this if you guys want to succeed.
I'm not here to fud you, I was a part of the testnet, and used to like the project. But marketing this with "high tps" or "super BFT" is far from being honest for newcomers. When ETH 2.0 will be live it'll be thousands times faster than Semux and with an immense developers base it'll simply crush every other so called "self contract eth compatible platform" project.
You need to find another narrative. Fast.
(oh and no, having your client being written in JAVA isn't groundbreaking)
totally agree, if semux wants to comes back to race, it reaslly needs some update or even complete changes in methodology to be able to compete the other famous coins,
currently, it is just a small kid among all adults playing around x_X