Your CPUs cant handle all the work 
Are you sure? Thought it wasnt the problem because its threaded..
edit:
Aah yeah its maxed indeed, looked at the wrong terminal
Dont use production servers for (currently worthless) coin mining!
Topic: [ANN][SHC] ShinyCoin █First ever RAMHOG algo Pow/Pos █NO ASIC/GPU | Whitepaper - page 32. (Read 58444 times)
June 25, 2014, 01:27:02 PM
Are you sure? Thought it wasnt the problem because its threaded..
edit:
Aah yeah its maxed indeed, looked at the wrong terminal
Dont use production servers for (currently worthless) coin mining!
June 25, 2014, 01:19:20 PM
Your CPUs cant handle all the work
Are you sure? Thought it wasnt the problem because its threaded..
edit:
Aah yeah its maxed indeed, looked at the wrong terminal
June 25, 2014, 01:11:39 PM
Can someone explain?
Running it with 60GB i get ~80 hpm, running it with 240GB i get ~150 hpm
"genproclimit" : 15,
"hashespermin" : 150,
I thought running it with more mem gave a bigger advantage.
Running it with 60GB i get ~80 hpm, running it with 240GB i get ~150 hpm
Quote
"genproclimit" : 15,
"hashespermin" : 150,
Quote
"genproclimit" : 3,
"hashespermin" : 84,
"hashespermin" : 84,
I thought running it with more mem gave a bigger advantage.
Your CPUs cant handle all the work
June 25, 2014, 01:10:12 PM
Can someone explain?
Running it with 60GB i get ~80 hpm, running it with 240GB i get ~150 hpm
I thought running it with more mem gave a bigger advantage.
Running it with 60GB i get ~80 hpm, running it with 240GB i get ~150 hpm
Quote
"genproclimit" : 15,
"hashespermin" : 150,
"hashespermin" : 150,
Quote
"genproclimit" : 3,
"hashespermin" : 84,
"hashespermin" : 84,
I thought running it with more mem gave a bigger advantage.
June 25, 2014, 12:45:23 PM
Also, are we sure that the standalone miner is fixed and works as expected? This is very critical.
Yes it works for stratum, I haven't tested solo mine but it should work too.
Pool should be fixed now.
June 25, 2014, 12:32:09 PM
Come on sandor, fix the pool, dont waste our hash
June 25, 2014, 12:00:46 PM
If the dev releases the new code that would not require a local ramhog thread to validate blocks and manage the wallet, then the pool server costs would be greatly reduced.
We 'll have to wait.
We 'll have to wait.
If that happens then this coin will be huge... but it's a very hard task.
June 25, 2014, 11:53:32 AM
The server is really expensive... it has 256 GB RAM and 2x Xeon 2620v2, to make it worthwhile I am taking 5% fee for now until I figure out a way to reduce the load on the server... I know I should update the page because it still has the 1% from Slimcoinpool.
Increased the initial pool diff by 2000%.
Increased the initial pool diff by 2000%.
Quote
Anyway good to see some innovation these days hope the pool comes back online soon for a testdrive..
It's online, or am I missing something? hope the pool comes back online soon for a testdrive..Yes now it is. Got a message before it was in maintenance. Thx!
edit:
Code:
[2014-06-25 17:11:25] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 82.63 hash/m (yay!!!)
June 25, 2014, 11:35:37 AM
The server is really expensive... it has 256 GB RAM and 2x Xeon 2620v2, to make it worthwhile I am taking 5% fee for now until I figure out a way to reduce the load on the server... I know I should update the page because it still has the 1% from Slimcoinpool.
Increased the initial pool diff by 2000%.
Increased the initial pool diff by 2000%.
Quote
Anyway good to see some innovation these days hope the pool comes back online soon for a testdrive..
It's online, or am I missing something? hope the pool comes back online soon for a testdrive.. June 25, 2014, 11:29:15 AM
So my conclusion for now; coin with potential but the launch was rushed and enabled istamine for the power user. Not a fair coin imo.
There was no instamine, the block reward started at 1 and went to 400 over the course of 2 days.
You are right, sorry! Missed this in the ANN post, my bad... Proof is also in the blockchain so i take my words back on the instamine.
Still the coin is targeted to powerusers, hope these things will get optimized in the next weeks for better adoption.
Anyway good to see some innovation these days
hope the pool comes back online soon for a testdrive.. 
June 25, 2014, 11:02:29 AM
how about the exchange?where?
June 25, 2014, 11:00:27 AM
23 boxes, 32GB ram each
hashes per sec shown in the miner cmd?
June 25, 2014, 10:59:11 AM
@sandor111: What fees does this pool have? Also does this NOMP software display any detailed statistics about payments anywhere?
We really need an open source pool....
June 25, 2014, 10:42:03 AM
Checking the pool miners I see a hashrate: 3.750 H/s
What box (specs) can produce such hashrate?
What box (specs) can produce such hashrate?
Its me testing the pool...
How many ramhog threads would that mean?46
such RAMShit!
On a single box or you managed to run a farm?That box has to be a beast!
23 boxes, 32GB ram each
June 25, 2014, 10:37:48 AM
Checking the pool miners I see a hashrate: 3.750 H/s
What box (specs) can produce such hashrate?
What box (specs) can produce such hashrate?
Its me testing the pool...
How many ramhog threads would that mean?46
such RAM June 25, 2014, 10:33:26 AM
Checking the pool miners I see a hashrate: 3.750 H/s
What box (specs) can produce such hashrate?
What box (specs) can produce such hashrate?
Its me testing the pool...
June 25, 2014, 09:51:39 AM
The problem is that solo mining is quite difficult now. We will need a reliable pool soon. By this I don't mean to undervalue sandor111's efforts with his pool. But it just doesn't seem reliable enough to me so far, but still seems to be in testing phase.
The more hashes the pool gets, the faster I'll be able to make it more reliable. It takes a lot of changes because the hashing algo is so so slow.
June 25, 2014, 09:14:14 AM
So my conclusion for now; coin with potential but the launch was rushed and enabled istamine for the power user. Not a fair coin imo.
There was no instamine, the block reward started at 1 and went to 400 over the course of 2 days.
June 25, 2014, 07:19:55 AM
Like the idea behind this coin but its pretty useless if it is impossible to run the wallet at a normal desktop pc. The client just simply starts, freezes and quits. Also the blockchain sync is terrible slow, know issue or only me??
Saw the freezing willbe addressed shortly so for the moment i will give it a try an a few xeons as testdrive.
So my conclusion for now; coin with potential but the launch was rushedand enabled istamine for the power user. Not a fair coin imo.
Saw the freezing willbe addressed shortly so for the moment i will give it a try an a few xeons as testdrive.
So my conclusion for now; coin with potential but the launch was rushed
June 25, 2014, 05:25:07 AM
The problem was that the wallet is accepting blocks really slowly (takes like 20s), and the pool sent the query to check the block faster than it should. Fixed it by querying every 20s atleast 5 times.
Jump to: