Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][SIGN] Signature Chain | Blockchain-based document certification - page 4. (Read 30356 times)

member
Activity: 158
Merit: 28
signature chain just for verification or the docs are also stored on the chain,like IPFS did?

No, nothing gets stored on the blockchain, no one gets to see the content of the files. We work with timestamps and hash ID's.
Each file has its own unique hash ID, when the file gets altered the hash ID changes with it. Combining this with timestamping allows us to certify authenticity of basically anything digital without people actually getting to see the contents of what is being certified.
So,why need a new chain to get hash ID when there were such service based on bitcoin?
http://www.proofofexistence.com

My argument would be because Bitcoin itself is aging. If we ever reach the transaction fees from 2017 again it'll be more expensive than doing centralized certification, in some cases even slower.


Nah thats not an argument. Every single blockchain can be used this way. Even Tittycoin can be used to get proof of authenticity of anything. Lol. Now a scoundrel like u with saggy tits comes up with a solution like this BUT this not a solution, it is merely part of the idea of any blockchain. The one can obtain non-falsifiable proofs by just hashing a digital image of whatever and verifying that with the blockchain. Bang! ur fradulent scheme just got uncovered.

Ofcourse every blockchain can do this. Every blockchain can also do decentralized web hosting. It's not about what a blockchain CAN do. It's about what it IS doing. The partners, the applications, the users the list goes on. It's not simply about the smart contract. It's like saying well this business COULD also do that, they just don't have it worked out in an ease of use way, have 0 users and actually don't even have a dApp for it..

And yes it is a valid argument because doing this on Bitcoin is simply too expensive and slow, that is undeniable.

Signature Chain has been developing non stop for 1.5 years with constant loss of funds instead of profits so if this project were a scam they're doing pretty terrible. The connections with Waves Platform and already existing applications scream of this not being a scam. Please look into the project you're trying to call a scam.

I would love to see a comment from you on my reply.
member
Activity: 148
Merit: 20
signature chain just for verification or the docs are also stored on the chain,like IPFS did?

No, nothing gets stored on the blockchain, no one gets to see the content of the files. We work with timestamps and hash ID's.
Each file has its own unique hash ID, when the file gets altered the hash ID changes with it. Combining this with timestamping allows us to certify authenticity of basically anything digital without people actually getting to see the contents of what is being certified.
So,why need a new chain to get hash ID when there were such service based on bitcoin?
http://www.proofofexistence.com

My argument would be because Bitcoin itself is aging. If we ever reach the transaction fees from 2017 again it'll be more expensive than doing centralized certification, in some cases even slower.


Nah thats not an argument. Every single blockchain can be used this way. Even Tittycoin can be used to get proof of authenticity of anything. Lol. Now a scoundrel like u with saggy tits comes up with a solution like this BUT this not a solution, it is merely part of the idea of any blockchain. The one can obtain non-falsifiable proofs by just hashing a digital image of whatever and verifying that with the blockchain. Bang! ur fradulent scheme just got uncovered.
copper member
Activity: 79
Merit: 1
We now have our own Signature Chain page on http://wavesplatform.com, thanks to Waves for the constant support.

Check it out https://wavesplatform.com/use-case/5e4d3b4b3985110010515c86

copper member
Activity: 79
Merit: 1
Our 2020 plans with Side Projects and extended development for http://sign-web.app is out!!

Also coming soon: Our community program allowing SIGN supporters to join the project and help us reach the adoption of our tools.

https://signature-chain.com/roadmap.html


copper member
Activity: 79
Merit: 1
The beta of our most complex feature to date is up and running on testnet, Multi-Party Agreements. Take a look at http://testnet.sign-web.app

https://youtu.be/B7pc1FGPBM4

https://twitter.com/SignatureChain/status/1227193872176074754



copper member
Activity: 79
Merit: 1
newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
Sounds interesting, I was alredy impressed in POE, its also a project with certification for redactional content, so i will follow you guys
copper member
Activity: 79
Merit: 1
We will be releasing a new feature on the testnet soon, Multi-Party agreements, this has been one of the most complex features to develop so far. It is also one of the features not many certification companies have, therefor allowing for easier partnerships.

Keep an eye out for announcements.
copper member
Activity: 79
Merit: 1
Hey! Sorry to see you have a strong hate for WAVES. I would really appreciate you not spreading FUD. We so far have been loving building on WAVES and will continue to do so.
hero member
Activity: 2146
Merit: 518
Why don't you use BTC or ETH for this ? It's doable on these chains and infinitely more secure.

Hey, mainly because it would be too slow and expensive. WAVES is next to instant with insanely cheap fees. Along that all the tools WAVES brings for developers like Waves Signer, Waves Labs, RIDE language.

WAVES hype is building up, huh? That shitcoin with its never ending grumbling and problems sickens my balls. Now everyone is mad about it. Like everyone is in the epicenter of a pandemic disease that eats up human brain. Probably we just need to take to twitter with anti-waves campaign and shove some sense into stupid cryptoers running around with their spam and ad endeavors.
copper member
Activity: 79
Merit: 1
Why don't you use BTC or ETH for this ? It's doable on these chains and infinitely more secure.

Hey, mainly because it would be too slow and expensive. WAVES is next to instant with insanely cheap fees. Along that all the tools WAVES brings for developers like Waves Signer, Waves Labs, RIDE language.
full member
Activity: 756
Merit: 103
Why don't you use BTC or ETH for this ? It's doable on these chains and infinitely more secure.
copper member
Activity: 79
Merit: 1
We are happy to announce the release of the last update of http://sign-web.app on Mainnet which includes:

- Fiat purchases in app
- Certification Credit
- Email Certification
- Mobile Support
- Waves Signer
- White Listing

-Promo video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgR58B8i9-Q

copper member
Activity: 79
Merit: 1
Hello everyone,

Expect an update at around the end of next week where we will be releasing of plethora of things.

-Waves Signer implementation on mainnet
-In app FIAT option on mainnet
-Ability to purchase "Certification Credits" on mainnet, each one will grant your account one free certification
-Whitelisting feature for our partners on mainnet
-A promo video for the SIGN Web App
-Support for mobile devices

The implementation of Waves Signer will make it so that people will not have to install a browser extension in order to use the web app. Because of this the application will also be able to work on mobile devices.

Waves Signer does not yet support Mass Transfers therefor we will have to disable this feature until Waves Signer does support it, which we expect to be in the near future.

Along with this we hope to soon have our pitch for future support.

copper member
Activity: 79
Merit: 1
https://twitter.com/SignatureChain/status/1205076972507779073?s=20

Our Web Wallet product is now officially listed on the site of Waves Platform itself! Check it out at wavesplatform.com/technology

In January we will be releasing Multiparty agreements and E-Mail Certification on mainnet. Stay tuned!

sr. member
Activity: 854
Merit: 252
Everything would be fine, but why waves blockchain?  Embarrassed Lips sealed
I hate this project, I received a lot of losses from it in due time.
The idea is good, of course, but with such an implementation it’s just without a chance.

Hey I'm sorry to hear you hate our project.

We chose Waves for a plethora of reasons. It has more modern functions, RIDE language, support for projects building on Waves.
We explain it more in depth in our whitepaper found here https://www.signature-chain.com/WP_SIGN.pdf .

We truly believe Waves is among the best platforms out there right now to develop your project on.

Do not think badly, I just look from my position and experience for more than 3 years in the market.
Now even a very good project is very difficult to break up.
Without a large community and brilliant programmers, any task will end in failure.
copper member
Activity: 79
Merit: 1
Everything would be fine, but why waves blockchain?  Embarrassed Lips sealed
I hate this project, I received a lot of losses from it in due time.
The idea is good, of course, but with such an implementation it’s just without a chance.

Hey I'm sorry to hear you hate our project.

We chose Waves for a plethora of reasons. It has more modern functions, RIDE language, support for projects building on Waves.
We explain it more in depth in our whitepaper found here https://www.signature-chain.com/WP_SIGN.pdf .

We truly believe Waves is among the best platforms out there right now to develop your project on.
copper member
Activity: 79
Merit: 1
i find the idea very interesting. but there are already projects that follow the same approach, aren't there?
and what's the status of things? does everything go according to plan or/and roadmap? Cool

Hey,

There are definitely some projects that are focused on certification. Most of them however are about tokenizing assets which is not what we do. We're about digital certification.
Our digital certification is already up and running on mainnet. You can certify any digital file.

We however aren't just about digital certification. We also have Mutual Agreements, Mass Transfers, E-Mail Certification and much more to come.

One of our exciting upcoming projects is SIGN Art. This project is focused purely on certifying digital art for artists. We already have a few partners to help us test the beta for this but are actively looking for more partners.

So far yes everything has gone according to the roadmap. We even add things next to the roadmap. Like the FIAT Payment system.
sr. member
Activity: 854
Merit: 252
Everything would be fine, but why waves blockchain?  Embarrassed Lips sealed
I hate this project, I received a lot of losses from it in due time.
The idea is good, of course, but with such an implementation it’s just without a chance.
staff
Activity: 2310
Merit: 2632
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
i find the idea very interesting. but there are already projects that follow the same approach, aren't there?
and what's the status of things? does everything go according to plan or/and roadmap? Cool
Pages:
Jump to: