devs,
can you contact bittrex and explain them we are on standby?
I'm making volume but we still need 3 btc volume tomorrow!!!
LAST DAY: TOMORROW!!!
...
Of course, I will further argue the case with Bittrex staff in attempt to prevent such a negative blow to Sterlingcoin.
Yes, as stated, we will. We will also remind Bittrex's staff of the other projects we are involved in that are bringing them much, the highest some days, volume.
Thank you for making volume.
Hi,
thanks for the update!
Any answer from bittrex?
I'm also helping with the volume, but we are 2 btc down and the deathline is today!!
Any ETA for start working on SLG?
I, Steven, am now again emailing Bittrex support and making a very strong, yet polite, argument for not delisting Sterlingcoin. Based on previous conversations, the closer we can get to the minimum volume requirement, the better. I sincerely thank those of you that are bringing some volume. If you are in a position that you can bring more and bring us closer to or surpassing the minimum, I can't thank you enough for doing so. That said, if we do not meet the minimum, we are at their mercy for more grace time on their exchange. But, no. No update from Bittrex staff as of yet. I will of course report any communication I receive in return.
As some of you know and I have expressed, both Matthew and Spencer are deeply entrenched in Silk Network, perhaps deeper or more consuming than they had hoped at this point in time. Please do understand we are 3 individuals trying to make a living or at least justify the countless, literally countless, hours we devote among
many other personal sacrifices. I too have obligations (EverGreenCoin, granite CWI, some less popular others) but have put those projects as low priority so I can focus on Sterlingcoin. Because of the maturity of those projects, I can. A luxury Silk Network and my colleagues can yet afford. I have started working on the code and looking at, and I have found, the reason the wallet inaccurately reports unconfirmed balance and thus total balance (but does not effect spendable). The solution to that issue will be in the rebase. So yes, the ETA
was September 21st.
At this time, I am working on the more pressing issue of moving the website (including the faucet and paper wallet sub domains) to Sterlingcoin.org as the expiration of the Sterlingcoin.guru domain, a domain I was forced to use temporarily because of financial constraints, is just days away. That did work out to be a blessing of sorts because the Sterlingcoin.org domain, previously held for auction of many thousands of dollars, became available in that time. On a progressive note, I do plan and am bringing back an official block explorer under the Sterlingcoin.org domain as well, to restore that service. I have secured the moneys for the VPS for that as well as the DNS seednodes to be built into the new rebased wallet. So if you are hesitating to bring volume thinking that the devs are not moving and funding Sterlingcoin forward, I offer that as proof, yes we are. We have come too far and the possibilities too great to not.
Even in the worst case of delisting from Bittrex, Sterlingcoin
is going forward. But I will not suggest that it would not be a tremendous impairment. Regaining listing on Bittrex once lost is unheard of, to the best of my knowledge. Again and from the entire Sterlingcoin dev team, many thanks to any help via volume in the final hours as we try to avoid this detriment to Sterlingcoin.
