Where is the new wallet? 
New Wallet With Price Incrase Relased ! http://goo.gl/6GEHLS
Feel free to download and use.
DONT DOWNLOAD THIS
Topic: [ANN][STAB] STABLE - ICO is over - Controlled Price Increases - page 3. (Read 34560 times)
December 18, 2014, 03:59:46 PM
New Wallet With Price Incrase Relased ! http://goo.gl/6GEHLS
Feel free to download and use.
DONT DOWNLOAD THIS
December 18, 2014, 03:56:01 PM
Where is the new wallet?
New Wallet With Price Incrase Relased ! http://goo.gl/6GEHLS
Feel free to download and use.
December 18, 2014, 03:05:55 PM
Where is the new wallet?
December 18, 2014, 01:29:07 PM
I need few rational arguments
Well?
Well?
December 18, 2014, 12:43:41 PM
what you mean scam 
i put all my xmass money in there more than 1 btc to get some little profit before im gonna buy xmass gifts.
i put all my xmass money in there more than 1 btc to get some little profit before im gonna buy xmass gifts. December 18, 2014, 12:07:53 PM
December 18, 2014, 11:57:32 AM
Why price so low?
December 18, 2014, 11:34:32 AM
well if there is no wallet today then we can assume its a scam but if it does appear we should see a pretty fast ride upwards
December 18, 2014, 05:26:15 AM
would be a great time for the dev to chime in
December 18, 2014, 03:56:14 AM
so according to roadmap tomorrow new wallet with first increase countdown
...now, speaking of wallet
as the stable wallet is a direct descendant of x15coin and seems to be identical twin of aegiscoin, there's just 1 deviation I'm curious about.
I pretty much don't have a clue how to rate that, as I couldn't find a reference anywhere else (not even at cpan).
you'll find it somewhere right in the middle of T512_21
Code:
aegis/src/hamsi_helper.c
static const sph_u32 T512_21[128][16] = {
...
SPH_C32(0x2f353af4), SPH_C32(0xb1337778), SPH_C32(0xc4b6a25d), // <- @22788 this should be: 0xb1152578
==========
...
}
static const sph_u32 T512_21[128][16] = {
...
SPH_C32(0x2f353af4), SPH_C32(0xb1337778), SPH_C32(0xc4b6a25d), // <- @22788 this should be: 0xb1152578
==========
...
}
now, maybe you can shed some light on that...
This makes absolutely no sense and has no use - just one - its a watermark so the dev can follow traces if his coins gets forked and renamed again
thanks ocminer so would i be correct in saying its nothing bad right?
Thats correct - nothing bad - just a watermark
December 18, 2014, 03:51:53 AM
so according to roadmap tomorrow new wallet with first increase countdown
...now, speaking of wallet
as the stable wallet is a direct descendant of x15coin and seems to be identical twin of aegiscoin, there's just 1 deviation I'm curious about.
I pretty much don't have a clue how to rate that, as I couldn't find a reference anywhere else (not even at cpan).
you'll find it somewhere right in the middle of T512_21
Code:
aegis/src/hamsi_helper.c
static const sph_u32 T512_21[128][16] = {
...
SPH_C32(0x2f353af4), SPH_C32(0xb1337778), SPH_C32(0xc4b6a25d), // <- @22788 this should be: 0xb1152578
==========
...
}
static const sph_u32 T512_21[128][16] = {
...
SPH_C32(0x2f353af4), SPH_C32(0xb1337778), SPH_C32(0xc4b6a25d), // <- @22788 this should be: 0xb1152578
==========
...
}
now, maybe you can shed some light on that...
This makes absolutely no sense and has no use - just one - its a watermark so the dev can follow traces if his coins gets forked and renamed again
thanks ocminer so would i be correct in saying its nothing bad right?
December 18, 2014, 03:42:47 AM
so according to roadmap tomorrow new wallet with first increase countdown
...now, speaking of wallet
as the stable wallet is a direct descendant of x15coin and seems to be identical twin of aegiscoin, there's just 1 deviation I'm curious about.
I pretty much don't have a clue how to rate that, as I couldn't find a reference anywhere else (not even at cpan).
you'll find it somewhere right in the middle of T512_21
Code:
aegis/src/hamsi_helper.c
static const sph_u32 T512_21[128][16] = {
...
SPH_C32(0x2f353af4), SPH_C32(0xb1337778), SPH_C32(0xc4b6a25d), // <- @22788 this should be: 0xb1152578
==========
...
}
static const sph_u32 T512_21[128][16] = {
...
SPH_C32(0x2f353af4), SPH_C32(0xb1337778), SPH_C32(0xc4b6a25d), // <- @22788 this should be: 0xb1152578
==========
...
}
now, maybe you can shed some light on that...
This makes absolutely no sense and has no use - just one - its a watermark so the dev can follow traces if his coins gets forked and renamed again
December 18, 2014, 03:37:39 AM
Good luck!
Regarding block time. Isn't it dangerous at 30"?
Regarding block time. Isn't it dangerous at 30"?
No but no fees is a Problem...
+1
viacoin has 24 seconds block time, and it is not dangerous.
December 18, 2014, 03:25:14 AM
Guys, this coin is a scam.
I dev'd for the guys who created this and I actually thought they were legit but they haven't been answering me and I'm almost sure they already have the ICO funds. They also missed half of the agreed payment.
If the team contacts me again I'll delete the accusation but until then procede with extreme caution.
I dev'd for the guys who created this and I actually thought they were legit but they haven't been answering me and I'm almost sure they already have the ICO funds. They also missed half of the agreed payment.
If the team contacts me again I'll delete the accusation but until then procede with extreme caution.
for some reason they dont answer to PM's but they answered to my reply here. i did say be careful but signs of it being a scam i cannot see it. if dev does not respond to you il assume it is, thanks for the heads up.
December 18, 2014, 01:51:06 AM
Tired of shits.. I'm out.. 
buy XQN and XAI ...legit coins with good future!
buy XQN and XAI ...legit coins with good future! December 18, 2014, 12:17:46 AM
Guys, this coin is a scam.
I dev'd for the guys who created this and I actually thought they were legit but they haven't been answering me and I'm almost sure they already have the ICO funds. They also missed half of the agreed payment.
If the team contacts me again I'll delete the accusation but until then procede with extreme caution.
I dev'd for the guys who created this and I actually thought they were legit but they haven't been answering me and I'm almost sure they already have the ICO funds. They also missed half of the agreed payment.
If the team contacts me again I'll delete the accusation but until then procede with extreme caution.
December 17, 2014, 10:19:21 PM
Whats up with 86% of the coins owned by this address?
http://blocks.luckyalt.com:3015/address/STnwhdU9LdEzoEt7ueh4tRpgV6fo4AUfcn
CCEX http://blocks.luckyalt.com:3015/address/STnwhdU9LdEzoEt7ueh4tRpgV6fo4AUfcn
December 17, 2014, 09:19:56 PM
Whats up with 86% of the coins owned by this address?
http://blocks.luckyalt.com:3015/address/STnwhdU9LdEzoEt7ueh4tRpgV6fo4AUfcn
http://blocks.luckyalt.com:3015/address/STnwhdU9LdEzoEt7ueh4tRpgV6fo4AUfcn
December 17, 2014, 08:28:37 PM
Josh, russel and carrol is obvious phantasy names
December 17, 2014, 07:57:50 PM
so according to roadmap tomorrow new wallet with first increase countdown
...now, speaking of wallet
as the stable wallet is a direct descendant of x15coin and seems to be identical twin of aegiscoin, there's just 1 deviation I'm curious about.
I pretty much don't have a clue how to rate that, as I couldn't find a reference anywhere else (not even at cpan).
you'll find it somewhere right in the middle of T512_21
Code:
aegis/src/hamsi_helper.c
static const sph_u32 T512_21[128][16] = {
...
SPH_C32(0x2f353af4), SPH_C32(0xb1337778), SPH_C32(0xc4b6a25d), // <- @22788 this should be: 0xb1152578
==========
...
}
static const sph_u32 T512_21[128][16] = {
...
SPH_C32(0x2f353af4), SPH_C32(0xb1337778), SPH_C32(0xc4b6a25d), // <- @22788 this should be: 0xb1152578
==========
...
}
now, maybe you can shed some light on that...
dont know much about codes, what do you think it means
actually I intended to get the dev to comment upon that... as it's a pretty subtle deviation in one of a gazillion values in those lookup table arrays... but if someone changed this I as well suppose him to be able to elaborate on that... or point to a source where this change was implemented when he adopted the code...
...so, it was actually not you I addressed. just took your comment as a discussion starter
wish i knew how to read codes requested someone to look at it
Jump to: