Topic: [ANN]⭐[STO] Stellerro - the future of Digital Securities Investments 📊 - page 15. (Read 2971 times)
June 05, 2019, 09:00:39 AM
Hey. Are there countries that are not allowed to participate in your STO? sorry for my bad English .
June 05, 2019, 03:45:05 AM
Why is Stellerro rating on Icobench so low (3.4)? And why are members KYC reports failed on Icobench?
https://icobench.com/ico/stellerro
https://icobench.com/ico/stellerro
Hello, pliuhkam! Project evaluation is set automatically depending on the amount of data and expert evaluation. We have recently registered and have already sent a request to update the information to the support service including the KYC procedure. Team ICObench will update this in the next couple of days. However, you can use https://icoholder.com/en/stellero
June 05, 2019, 03:18:50 AM
Why is Stellerro rating on Icobench so low (3.4)? And why are members KYC reports failed on Icobench?
https://icobench.com/ico/stellerro
https://icobench.com/ico/stellerro
June 04, 2019, 07:48:28 AM
Hello to the Bitcointalk community! Our new article has been published and we are waiting for you to like it!
June 04, 2019, 07:14:53 AM
Maybe I don’t know all the legal issues, but the ESMA is a regulator for all EU countries with headquarters in France. Those. full compliance with the rules of ESMA Spain is equivalent to the whole resolution of the ESMA at the European level?
Ofcourse. ESMA is the European Union securities authority. every country in the euro union is acting under their securities law. so every country have their broker dealers and validators with license to approve under the ESMA law June 03, 2019, 06:53:40 PM
Maybe I don’t know all the legal issues, but the ESMA is a regulator for all EU countries with headquarters in France. Those. full compliance with the rules of ESMA Spain is equivalent to the whole resolution of the ESMA at the European level?
June 03, 2019, 12:35:23 PM
June 02, 2019, 09:45:00 AM
Stellerro's Platform Overview
We need to know your opinion, so write comments, impressions and wishes on forum or on YouTube page with our overview.
We need to know your opinion, so write comments, impressions and wishes on forum or on YouTube page with our overview.
June 02, 2019, 08:44:20 AM
Hi guys, a new Stellerro article is now available:
https://medium.com/stellerro/broken-down-the-subtle-differences-between-ico-ieo-and-stos-a08b4938cd1e
https://medium.com/stellerro/broken-down-the-subtle-differences-between-ico-ieo-and-stos-a08b4938cd1e
June 01, 2019, 06:20:04 AM
Get out of here with your FUD.
White paper said around 64% of tokens would be held by ICO contributors, but it didn’t go well so the team decided to keep the unsold tokens for some “other” purposes instead of burning them.
This ended up with the ICO contributors holding around 4% of tokens and are at the moment 99% down of their investment. Of course they are as they thought they would have the majority of the tokens, yet ended up with few percent.
The platform was supposed to be released in 2018, it is mid of 2019 and it is still in beta, probably something that requires few weeks of coding (to get to beta phase).
Plus, they started giving away tokens on newly joined exchange.
One thing is sure, that Bitjob project was built upon ICO contributors, and would have not started had there wasn’t their investment. Had I known that I’d never invested, but it was a good marketing at the beginning: Big universities’ names, Dutch government etc.
2 years later... ...the team is working on another ICO, and that hasn’t started yesterday.
This is a true story, not FUD.
Stellerro project might be successful, but people need to know who they work with.
What’s your connection to Stellerro?
June 01, 2019, 03:57:47 AM
I had a very bad experience with the team members leading this project. They did what they wanted, haven’t delivered what was in the whitepaper, and they started another ICO.
Be careful!!
You might want to double check that man. To my knowledge, this team has also worked on bitjob, and the last time I checked it's actually developing and in beta. So far they have a successful track record, and the Stellerro concept is pretty damned solid.
They managed to bring a project to beta with a custom platform; that's pretty impressive with so many icos that failed.
Back on topic, Stellerro has some serious potential, and (bonus) it's an actual security, you can profit.
Get out of here with your FUD.
May 30, 2019, 07:46:59 PM
About a year ago I saw a ERC-721 ARDL token in one project, and now ERC-1400. It seems that the standard interface of tokens goes much faster than its application in practice.
May 30, 2019, 03:56:57 PM
More and more people know about us, thanks to Yahoo Finance and PR Newswire!
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/big-things-coming-stellerro-plans-130000053.html
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/big-things-coming-stellerro-plans-130000053.html
May 30, 2019, 03:28:26 PM
I tried to find some information on https://www.esma.europa.eu/ that you are regulated by them but I couldnt find anything searching on their site.
Can you show us an official source to confirm that claim?
Thank you for your question, bernardos! The approval will be stamped in the offering memorandum (the whitepaper) , and once it will be released - we will post it (approximately next week). Can you show us an official source to confirm that claim?
May 30, 2019, 02:22:05 PM
I tried to find some information on https://www.esma.europa.eu/ that you are regulated by them but I couldnt find anything searching on their site.
Can you show us an official source to confirm that claim?
Can you show us an official source to confirm that claim?
May 30, 2019, 05:11:08 AM
Security Token Standards ERC-1400 ... I read about it on github, but have not seen projects using this standard, most likely Stellerro will be the first.
ERC 1400? First time to encounter as well.
And noticed that you are already using the TM-mark, where did you get the approval from?
https://i.imgur.com/Ml1Plzj.png
With the long list of your legal and compliance associates, I believe they are doing their job here.
The TM mark is registered in Israel and its also in process in 5 more European countries. we are approved to present the TM mark until we get the Registered (R) sign.
May 30, 2019, 04:58:54 AM
i think this token is ERC 1400 but in bounty0x it's written as ERC 20
is bounty0x just writing it wrong?
Thank you for paying attention. The team have edited it today, the option of choosing ERC-1400 when you publish a bounty campaign, was absent. Also thank bounty0x for correction/update.is bounty0x just writing it wrong?
May 30, 2019, 04:47:02 AM
as the people above me are really curious about the project, i expect this project could move to the top and what interesting about the token is erc 1400, they are the first.
What is the main feature of employing an ERC 1400? Haven't encountered a token like this one yet. Any advantage to your chosen industry?
ERC 1400 token is a cryptocurrency token built on Ethereum blockchain. It differs from other tokens built on ETH (ERC-20, ERC-777), because of special requirements for Security Tokens. More information can be found here https://github.com/thegostep/ERC-1400/blob/master/eip-1400.md If you still need more clarifications, feel free to ask. 😎
Any advantage to your chosen industry?
It's not an issue of an industry, its an issue of technology that supports the needs for a regulated token or digital securities. We can embed all industries or securities sectors on it, with changes per sector of the tokenized business.
May 29, 2019, 11:16:40 PM
as the people above me are really curious about the project, i expect this project could move to the top and what interesting about the token is erc 1400, they are the first.
What is the main feature of employing an ERC 1400? Haven't encountered a token like this one yet. Any advantage to your chosen industry?
Quote
Taken together, these security token standards provide document management, error signalling, gate keeper (operator) access control, off-chain data injection, issuance / redemption semantics and expose partially fungible subsets of a token holders balance.
source: https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/1411that token created based on the securitization standard. He was choosing the right one to try. Just wanna see about how this will be going on in the future.
May 29, 2019, 05:46:06 PM
i think this token is ERC 1400 but in bounty0x it's written as ERC 20
is bounty0x just writing it wrong?
is bounty0x just writing it wrong?
Jump to: