Topic: [ANN][SUPERCOIN] Unique Most Advanced Anonymous Trustless Multisig Technology - page 116. (Read 288859 times)

These fud will not lessen but increase being successful is a reason to be criticized.

K.E.E.P      P.U.S.H.I.N.G

The system has to be tested by real hackers, giving code proves nothing serious and very innocent by the dev.
Investors would come to this coin if there are 100 equal?
It is only my opinion

First of all, I asked because, if possible, I would like to run the supercoin wallet with my Linux box (arm CPU). It seems to me that there is even no Mac version for V3.0. Currently, only Windows binary distribution.

Secondly, isn't "open source" part of the most important attracting force in the cryptocurrency world? If something must remain closed source without being externally examined or audited, its trustworthiness might be challenged.

If V3.0 must remain closed source, I would like to ask the dev that: Can I run the V1.5 code on github for only supporting the network and doing the staking (if I don't need to do SuperSend and other advanced stuff)? Are these versions compatible on the fundamental functionality?

To all google experts...


Is there a possibility that we can look at the google searches of Supercoin. Now you see the thread of fudamentally broken, poliniex has rejected, another coin which is calles Supercoin and our old thread. And this thread is also difficult to spot, this thread should be the first one you see when people do a supercoin search.

It would be unwise to release the code, at least not before 1 year

I have a question regarding the source code.

The code on github is still V1.5 (non-anon), while the windows wallet is V3.0 (Trustless with Multisig) right?

So the latest version of wallet client software is not open source for now. Is there plan to open the source? Thanks!

FBI investigates JPMorgan hack attack

JPMorgan Chase and at least four other financial institutions were hacked recently in a series of coordinated attacks, a federal law enforcement official told USA TODAY.

The source, who was not authorized to comment publicly, said investigators believe Russian hackers were the source of the attacks. What is less clear is whether the attacks were prompted by U.S. sanctions against the Russian government.

The sophisticated cyberattack resulted in the loss of sensitive data, Bloomberg.com said, citing security experts.

Companies "of our size unfortunately experience cyberattacks nearly every day," JPMorgan spokeswoman Trish Wexler said in a statement without confirming the reports. "We have multiple layers of defense to counteract any threats and constantly monitor fraud levels."

FBI spokesman Paul Bresson said the agency is "working with the United States Secret Service to determine the scope of recently reported cyber attacks against several American financial institutions."

Hackers broke into the networks of the banks, where they siphoned data, including account information. Several security firms are conducting digital forensics of the breached computer networks, The New York Times reported.

It remains unknown whether the digital intruders were financially motivated or part of an espionage campaign.

"The ability to overcome the typical financial defense-in-depth strategy outlined by JPMorgan points to capabilities that go beyond criminal activity and are in the realm of nation state capabilities," said security expert Phil Lieberman, CEO of Lieberman Software.

A report on The Wall Street Journal's website said particulars about the incident — when it began, whom it impacted and its potential costs — were unclear.

Though there's no indication the two are linked, computer security firm Proofpoint on Aug. 21 reported a large-scale computer attack campaign targeting JP Morgan Chase customers.

The Sunnyvale, Calif.-based company reported multiple examples of a credential phishing campaign in which authentic-looking e-mails encouraged users to click a link to see a secure message from JP Morgan.

When they did, they were asked to enter their credentials. The Web page was hosted on a server in Moscow and installed a so-called Trojan-program onto their computer, allowing the attackers to compromise the user's computer

Proofpoint identified several other active campaigns that appeared to be run by the same attackers, each of which attempted to install the same Trojan software.

Contributing: Jessica Guynn

this is one of the few solid coins with great technologies and a responsible dev team.

REtweeted

I believe its a natural growth.

I alerted both explorer devs about updating wallet. It should be ok soon.

Run repairwallet command in help console it will fix.

Which explorer do you check? I alerted other explorer dev to update.

You may try to resync from scratch. (backup first) and use the node list from the OP.

Payments happens every 3-7 days http://supermultipool.com/payments you can follow that link for more info.

he should have enough ram or cpu resources. If this is not the case, he can close staking from the supercoin.conf or re install it (after backing up)

since supercoin launched i had only 1 or 2 times not daily logged in or posted. I have sometimes family issue and businesses.
So you can relax. Better community take some of the load off from my shoulders.

You need to wait about 5-10 minutes it will be over. Be patient and dont kill the process it will be ok. It also happens on my desktop at first opening it uses overly the resources.

bytheway thank you for updating the version we love to use your block explorer.

Because your tx is not in blockchain, repairwallet  command can fix it.