I want to ask when do you fall in the category PoR ?
Am i in i have only 134k
Topic: [ANN][SUPERCOIN] Unique Most Advanced Anonymous Trustless Multisig Technology - page 168. (Read 288840 times)
August 17, 2014, 10:22:28 PM
good question there Jaki
I want to ask when do you fall in the category PoR ?
Am i in i have only 134k
I want to ask when do you fall in the category PoR ?
Am i in i have only 134k
August 17, 2014, 10:15:34 PM
I got a question on Proof of Rich. (PoR)
Is it 50% more than the "current rate"?
So if the rate in a few years becomes only 1%, it'll be 1.5% for >100k addresses?
That's how I understood it but some say it's 1% + 50% = 51% which is bad IMO.
Which is correct?
Is it 50% more than the "current rate"?
So if the rate in a few years becomes only 1%, it'll be 1.5% for >100k addresses?
That's how I understood it but some say it's 1% + 50% = 51% which is bad IMO.
Which is correct?
August 17, 2014, 10:06:53 PM
Don't just look at MP. Look at Bittrex also. It's a bit better there.
But yeah, I'm just annoyed I didn't get some at 1500-1600 range. Doh.
But yeah, I'm just annoyed I didn't get some at 1500-1600 range. Doh.
August 17, 2014, 10:06:46 PM
To point something out, the guy who started that fud thread wrote this before (in another thread)
Oh and he's a XC supporter.
Funny how you can influence a market that easy. The issue that claims to be the reason it's 'fundamentally broken' is an issue all devs are aware of and (as stated before) is something impossible for a dev (especially ours) to just have forgotten to think about. It's ridiculous these statements are made without looking at the coding. They stated themselves that "you can't claim to have trustless anon with a whitepaper that has no codes explanation" but somehow they have the ability to tell it's broken ? Come on...
I would try to defend against those fudsters but I don't have the technical knowledge, like most people here.
A troll with technical knowledge is really the worst kind of troll since it normally takes statements from the dev to put them in place.
A troll with technical knowledge is really the worst kind of troll since it normally takes statements from the dev to put them in place.
Oh and he's a XC supporter.
Funny how you can influence a market that easy. The issue that claims to be the reason it's 'fundamentally broken' is an issue all devs are aware of and (as stated before) is something impossible for a dev (especially ours) to just have forgotten to think about. It's ridiculous these statements are made without looking at the coding. They stated themselves that "you can't claim to have trustless anon with a whitepaper that has no codes explanation" but somehow they have the ability to tell it's broken ? Come on...
look at XC:
Quote
See the facts below:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/xc-uses-multisig-address-and-transaction-the-answer-is-no-look-at-facts-here-742025
with the conclusion here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8402058
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/xc-uses-multisig-address-and-transaction-the-answer-is-no-look-at-facts-here-742025
with the conclusion here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8402058
It's a shame for them.
BTW the issues raised against Supercoin are not issues, I found the discussions in this thread (don't read that XC fud thread, it does not make any sense):
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8402776
August 17, 2014, 09:28:36 PM
Thanks FUD'ers, I just nearly doubled my money!!
August 17, 2014, 09:22:48 PM
Price is going up
If the buy support can move up, then we can get the rally going. Right now on MP, the top bid is 2k....
August 17, 2014, 09:21:16 PM
Price is going up
August 17, 2014, 09:12:28 PM
To point something out, the guy who started that fud thread wrote this before
Oh and he's a XC supporter.
Funny how you can influence a market that easy. The issue that claims to be the reason it's 'fundamentally broken' is an issue all devs are aware of and (as stated before) is something impossible for a dev (especially ours) to just have forgotten to think about. It's ridiculous these statements are made without looking at the coding. They stated themselves that "you can't claim to have trustless anon with a whitepaper that has no codes explanation" but somehow they have the ability to tell it's broken ? Come on...
I would try to defend against those fudsters but I don't have the technical knowledge, like most people here.
A troll with technical knowledge is really the worst kind of troll since it normally takes statements from the dev to put them in place.
Supercoin and mammothcoin are shooting themselves in the foot. New people won't want to invest in a coin which has multiple topics with giant red font talking shit.
A troll with technical knowledge is really the worst kind of troll since it normally takes statements from the dev to put them in place.
Supercoin and mammothcoin are shooting themselves in the foot. New people won't want to invest in a coin which has multiple topics with giant red font talking shit.
Oh and he's a XC supporter.
Funny how you can influence a market that easy. The issue that claims to be the reason it's 'fundamentally broken' is an issue all devs are aware of and (as stated before) is something impossible for a dev (especially ours) to just have forgotten to think about. It's ridiculous these statements are made without looking at the coding. They stated themselves that "you can't claim to have trustless anon with a whitepaper that has no codes explanation" but somehow they have the ability to tell it's broken ? Come on...
It's nothing more than a pissing contest, downside is most people dont actually know or read what is being said.
August 17, 2014, 09:07:55 PM
Mammothballs sounds great - they are big!!! 
August 17, 2014, 09:06:52 PM
To point something out, the guy who started that fud thread wrote this before (in another thread)
Oh and he's a XC supporter.
Funny how you can influence a market that easy. The issue that claims to be the reason it's 'fundamentally broken' is an issue all devs are aware of and (as stated before) is something impossible for a dev (especially ours) to just have forgotten to think about. It's ridiculous these statements are made without looking at the coding. They stated themselves that "you can't claim to have trustless anon with a whitepaper that has no codes explanation" but somehow they have the ability to tell it's broken ? Come on...
I would try to defend against those fudsters but I don't have the technical knowledge, like most people here.
A troll with technical knowledge is really the worst kind of troll since it normally takes statements from the dev to put them in place.
A troll with technical knowledge is really the worst kind of troll since it normally takes statements from the dev to put them in place.
Oh and he's a XC supporter.
Funny how you can influence a market that easy. The issue that claims to be the reason it's 'fundamentally broken' is an issue all devs are aware of and (as stated before) is something impossible for a dev (especially ours) to just have forgotten to think about. It's ridiculous these statements are made without looking at the coding. They stated themselves that "you can't claim to have trustless anon with a whitepaper that has no codes explanation" but somehow they have the ability to tell it's broken ? Come on...
August 17, 2014, 09:02:20 PM
Wow. That selloff was HUGE!
Got so many cheap super coins, thank you FUD, I have learned over the past few months how to profit massively from FUD dumps. Instant 100-400% profit often time.
Swim with the FUD'ers
August 17, 2014, 08:53:44 PM
Wow. That selloff was HUGE!
August 17, 2014, 08:29:28 PM
So many people don't have the nerves for daytrading, getting spooked way to easy. If i'd panic sell on every little rumour when working i'd be a really poor guy and probably nervewrecked right now. Grow a pair of SuperBalls or MammothBalls whatever you prefer.
The tech is working, doing what it's supposed to do and I think Supercoin and Mammothcoin will achieve what countless coins before them have tried.
The tech is working, doing what it's supposed to do and I think Supercoin and Mammothcoin will achieve what countless coins before them have tried.
August 17, 2014, 08:23:58 PM
Guys we have nearly 40 pages of the thread and nearly 15 000 views 
Dont think this is coincidence
Dont think this is coincidence
August 17, 2014, 08:21:01 PM
lmao, panic sell again
I want more cheap coins
I want more cheap coins August 17, 2014, 08:17:39 PM
sigh, is this whole xc pissing contest still going on, thought it was over after apologies and now its starting up again...
August 17, 2014, 08:01:05 PM
Supercoin/mammothcoin tech is badly broken:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/supercoin-is-fundamentally-broken-read-why-inside-and-save-yourself-money-742246
The latest reply from the supercoin dev shows he isn't even familiar with how transaction malleability works.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/supercoin-is-fundamentally-broken-read-why-inside-and-save-yourself-money-742246
The latest reply from the supercoin dev shows he isn't even familiar with how transaction malleability works.
How can someone really say something is broken without it even being fully released yet? Right now its just speculation. I'd imagine there may be a few hitches on the first release. I'd also venture to say the dev team will fix those issues as they come up. Nothing is ever perfect.
Right now all i see is XC fanboys trying to FUD Super like they were FUDed on by DRK and I see Super fanboys FUDing XC for their current tech. Instead of everyone fighting about who's dad can beat up the other dads, why not try working together to make a better system. If you can't work together then leave each other alone and focus your energy on making your coin better.
+1
its simple as that!
Go Super, theres nothing happening right now to worry about, we are still in Cryptoland guys! =)
sweet and relaxed dreams everybody.
XC fanboys got frustrated because while they claimed they had multisig, they did not even know what are multisig, and took something else as multisig. They actually never saw XC multisig address before, while some138 created 2 XC multisig addresses and show them. See the facts below:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/xc-uses-multisig-address-and-transaction-the-answer-is-no-look-at-facts-here-742025
with the conclusion here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8402058
It is a joke.
lmao, what a fail
BTW the issues raised against Supercoin are not issues, I found the discussions in this thread (don't read that XC fud thread, it does not make any sense):
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8402776
August 17, 2014, 07:57:51 PM
August 17, 2014, 07:55:42 PM
Supercoin/mammothcoin tech is badly broken:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/supercoin-is-fundamentally-broken-read-why-inside-and-save-yourself-money-742246
The latest reply from the supercoin dev shows he isn't even familiar with how transaction malleability works.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/supercoin-is-fundamentally-broken-read-why-inside-and-save-yourself-money-742246
The latest reply from the supercoin dev shows he isn't even familiar with how transaction malleability works.
How can someone really say something is broken without it even being fully released yet? Right now its just speculation. I'd imagine there may be a few hitches on the first release. I'd also venture to say the dev team will fix those issues as they come up. Nothing is ever perfect.
Right now all i see is XC fanboys trying to FUD Super like they were FUDed on by DRK and I see Super fanboys FUDing XC for their current tech. Instead of everyone fighting about who's dad can beat up the other dads, why not try working together to make a better system. If you can't work together then leave each other alone and focus your energy on making your coin better.
+1
its simple as that!
Go Super, theres nothing happening right now to worry about, we are still in Cryptoland guys! =)
sweet and relaxed dreams everybody.
XC fanboys got frustrated because while they claimed they had multisig, they did not even know what are multisig, and took something else as multisig. They actually never saw XC multisig address before, while some138 created 2 XC multisig addresses and show them. See the facts below:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/xc-uses-multisig-address-and-transaction-the-answer-is-no-look-at-facts-here-742025
with the conclusion here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8402058
It is a joke.
August 17, 2014, 07:52:07 PM
I won't scroll, i believe you have your own reasons for your posts.
Furthermore, we are definitely on the good way, because so many dust raised on something that is not released yet.
I won't elaborate their motivation and deeds, because that's telling me that we are on the road to do something great.
Wherever i look, i only see crap about MAMM and SUPER from them...
Furthermore, we are definitely on the good way, because so many dust raised on something that is not released yet.
I won't elaborate their motivation and deeds, because that's telling me that we are on the road to do something great.
Wherever i look, i only see crap about MAMM and SUPER from them...
Jump to: