Tacee, if you even bothered to read over the last several pages, the whitepaper, or any of the coin's historical documentation, you would have realized your declarations are unwarranted, ignorant, and are based on nothing but naivety. We've already established that this donation feature has been in the code since the beginning, it has been documented, it has been and had been made public, and most important of all, the amount is controlled by the END USER---that means you.
I agree with tacee.once you fool others,it's hard to rebuild faith. 
Topic: [ANN][TAC] TalkCoin - page 46. (Read 266731 times)
Tacee, if you even bothered to read over the last several pages, the whitepaper, or any of the coin's historical documentation, you would have realized your declarations are unwarranted, ignorant, and are based on nothing but naivety. We've already established that this donation feature has been in the code since the beginning, it has been documented, it has been and had been made public, and most important of all, the amount is controlled by the END USER---that means you.
why you got so angry ? I bet you lost a lot money in this new-type scam shitcoin,feel bad?
I don't see any anger in xwebnetwork comment, he is just trying to use logic on trolls and kids that come here to trash the thread
Tacee, if you even bothered to read over the last several pages, the whitepaper, or any of the coin's historical documentation, you would have realized your declarations are unwarranted, ignorant, and are based on nothing but naivety. We've already established that this donation feature has been in the code since the beginning, it has been documented, it has been and had been made public, and most important of all, the amount is controlled by the END USER---that means you.
why you got so angry ? I bet you lost a lot money in this new-type scam shitcoin,feel bad?
Wow, fudders are on fire 
Network speed dropped because of us, we had issues with our hosting provider and TAC pool was down for two hours.
Everything is back to normal now
Network speed dropped because of us, we had issues with our hosting provider and TAC pool was down for two hours.
Everything is back to normal now
under 1000S,it is time to buy!
Children of tits ... You Have a shit ton of coins to play, stop disturb to serious people with lies of small child
Here do not want people working for free, and we want to dev team happy.
If you continue with the attitude, I call your mothers .... 
Here do not want people working for free, and we want to dev team happy.
If you continue with the attitude, I call your mothers ....
Wow, the gang of queen-anne shit are in TAC ... You've already gone to SAVALE quiet? No longer weep in their thread?
You are a bunch of retarded , telling lies and raising suspicions. Here you are not well received idiots...
You have come to contaminate the currency to buy very cheap? There are other ways to make money in Talkcoin without blatant put yourselves in evidence. You do the same in other currencies to buy very cheap .... and the worst thing, is that some fool bites your bait
As I already have some evidence that it is true that your task is to buy cheap trollear, i'm going to denounce the staff your behavior
Very fud? = Pumpers Scam
You are a bunch of retarded , telling lies and raising suspicions. Here you are not well received idiots...
You have come to contaminate the currency to buy very cheap? There are other ways to make money in Talkcoin without blatant put yourselves in evidence. You do the same in other currencies to buy very cheap .... and the worst thing, is that some fool bites your bait
As I already have some evidence that it is true that your task is to buy cheap trollear, i'm going to denounce the staff your behavior
Very fud? = Pumpers Scam
Anybody defending this shit is out of his mind.
It was fun knowing you TAC coin.
It was fun knowing you TAC coin.
Decentralized communication? I'm really curious how this could work as far as the blockchain is concerned. Will have to take a closer look.
Net hash dropped to below 3gh/s already.
There is a sentence in the OP:
"To avoid problems from block halving making mining unprofitable and ensure enough TAC are available for messaging, Talkcoin has a decentralized vote feature so twice per week users can vote to adjust block reward up or down by 10%."
For a start, editing the above sentence reflect "current" voting % is to reward/donate to dev. Then give a firm date when voting will be disabled and what method will replace it. Do these to gain back trust from yr community before it is too late.
There is a sentence in the OP:
"To avoid problems from block halving making mining unprofitable and ensure enough TAC are available for messaging, Talkcoin has a decentralized vote feature so twice per week users can vote to adjust block reward up or down by 10%."
For a start, editing the above sentence reflect "current" voting % is to reward/donate to dev. Then give a firm date when voting will be disabled and what method will replace it. Do these to gain back trust from yr community before it is too late.
nobody will trust you ,Dev,a liar is always a liar,fk yourself and just let this coin die.
in fact ,dev should admit the mistakes he had made,and give us a roadmap of dealing with this issue.we should not shout at each other, it's nonsense. Tacee, if you even bothered to read over the last several pages, the whitepaper, or any of the coin's historical documentation, you would have realized your declarations are unwarranted, ignorant, and are based on nothing but naivety. We've already established that this donation feature has been in the code since the beginning, it has been documented, it has been and had been made public, and most important of all, the amount is controlled by the END USER---that means you.
maybe he will change the rewards by another way.not due to the votes. 
Tacee, if you even bothered to read over the last several pages, the whitepaper, or any of the coin's historical documentation, you would have realized your declarations are unwarranted, ignorant, and are based on nothing but naivety. We've already established that this donation feature has been in the code since the beginning, it has been documented, it has been and had been made public, and most important of all, the amount is controlled by the END USER---that means you.
nobody will trust you ,Dev,a liar is always a liar,fk yourself and just let this coin die.
Dev's greed killed this coin,over~
dev ,you should remove the voting system ASAP if you want a good future of TAC.
The Voting system will kill the Coin indeed.
you can get the 3- 5% of the Block rewards.but you should never get 30% or more of it.
it's so crazy. Roll Eyes
I agree with this view
The Voting system will kill the Coin indeed.
you can get the 3- 5% of the Block rewards.but you should never get 30% or more of it.
it's so crazy. Roll Eyes
I agree with this view
3% may not be that much in your eyes, but it's quite significant in mine and more than enough to be on the first ANN post
If you don't want the open source developers earn a tiny amount of the total coin reward then vote 0, this is not fixed.
But note than 0 reward, it's also 0 development, 0 effort and no team behind to continue work...
Talkcoin was made so to be a long term project.
You can't have your cake and eat it too, that's why other coins are abandoned by the devs.
I don't think 3% of every block reward is totally unreasonable, however, I do believe it should be clearly stated on the coin's ann page or home page, which it isn't in this case. I do think 30% of every block reward is unreasonable, and I just found out about this today, after holding and mining some tac and following thread for some time.
As to your other point:
Quote
You can't have your cake and eat it too, that's why other coins are abandoned by the devs.
That would seem to be largely at odds with the most successful coins in the world, that includes not only btc and ltc, but newer coins such as monero and cryptonite.
I'm not mad. I'm not holding enough to get worked up about it. I just think it's being less than upfront to not make it more clear that the devs get 3% (or previously much more) of all coins generated. It's totally absent from the first ANN page and the homepage. How are people supposed to know?
3% may not be that much in your eyes, but it's quite significant in mine and more than enough to be on the first ANN post
If you don't want the open source developers earn a tiny amount of the total coin reward then vote 0, this is not fixed.
But note than 0 reward, it's also 0 development, 0 effort and no team behind to continue work...
Talkcoin was made so to be a long term project.
You can't have your cake and eat it too, that's why other coins are abandoned by the devs.
Anyone with half a brain knows that some kind of reward should be in store for devs. I think people just expect the devs to do shit for free along with whatever people they bring on to developing the coin.
I mean really people, if this was a scam, the dev would have dumped and moved on a long time ago... gesh.
3% may not be that much in your eyes, but it's quite significant in mine and more than enough to be on the first ANN post
If you don't want the open source developers earn a tiny amount of the total coin reward then vote 0, this is not fixed.
But note than 0 reward, it's also 0 development, 0 effort and no team behind to continue work...
Talkcoin was made so to be a long term project.
You can't have your cake and eat it too, that's why other coins are abandoned by the devs.
That is what i don't get in cryptos in general .. It is as if everyone else should profit but not the devs.. they have to develop everything but not gain anything extra for it.
3% isn't all that much. Especially since it come with the blocks over time and not all at once .. I rather have this than a dev with 1% of the total of coins from the start,
we have seen often enough how well that end.
I am all for the fees to stay if it mean a continued serious devlopment for the coin.
Jump to: