Topic: [ANN][TAC] TalkCoin *** OFFICIAL THREAD *** - page 5. (Read 63892 times)

It is most likely him .. he never answers to anything being asked/said about him on his real account if anyone noticed. Or anything relevant to the fact the old dev is a scammer either.
He just keep posting his propaganda for block rewards goodness.

Hi whomever you are (clearly not Andy/Talkteam).
The big difference is that we don't want to own talkcoin, we want to make it successful and free of scammy dev.
That's a big difference.

edit: if you are k-meister, I am still waiting for your apologies

You could answer with your real account k-m you know Beside , you do spam the official thread with all your fake accounts along the chinese guy more than the other team does.

And i am in no way part of the v2 team ...I just find all this pretty amusing and sad to see how one guy whom have not a single clue / skill other than being an attention whore is trying to actually manipulate others into believing his own baseless promises just because greed.

Well done djm34 and dav1199 we’ve got them on the ropes now.

A few more spams today and we’ll have talkcoin in our control for sure. I'll notify the exchanges.

Once we own talkcoin djm34 I’ll buy you those pants that help with your flatulence problem. And dav1199 I'll buy you that magazine you like with the animal pictures.

For those who have doubt that dev stole a lot of TAC, here a screen copy of the block explorer with the votedev address.
around 500k tac were sent to that address and worst 400k tac were spent.

Meaning old dev dumped on us all all the time.
I am sorry to say that (as an early supporter of the coin), but that guy is a massive asshole.
The blockexplorer is located in china and is rather slow: http://talk.cryptocoinunion.com/address.asp?address=TgD7ERrggBPezx6JPP2bpWjAFQW1rafzCn

Supporting old dev is just making you part of the scam. If you still think that the  takeover is hostile and not justified, sorry you need a new brain

(I would suggest k-meister to organize a new protest in front of old dev house with a plate saying: "why my tac has no value ?"  
I understand, I am in his ignore list... but I would suggest him to remove me (and apologies) before he looks like a total moron for supporting a scam  )

That's why I made a screen copy:
 

If the vote was removed then what do you suggest as a dev reward?
I think the dev wants to do 0% but it would be good to know what people think anyway.
If we wanted to attract people to the team then having a reward would be useful. Also maybe for giveaways etc.

I personally don't think that any devs should be expected to work for free and a dev with some incentive is good for everyone.

[/quote]

Roll out Clean wallet immediately, no votedev but all other features remain (including Chat fee to genesis block for destruction)

Then only discuss for next fork to be implemented within 2 months. My input is only to start the discussions.

Dev team gets:
- 1% dev fee
- 0.0001 TAC per transaction (High transaction means coin is popular and Dev should be rewarded)
- This provide balance and check, more useful development, equal more usage, equal more reward for Dev team.

Reward of 10 TAC per block (old, new inverters and miners, everyone take a compromise to move forward)
- 10 TAC for 3 months, after that less 0.5 TAC per month, down to 1 TAC
- Price of TAC will be more stable during the gradual reduction of reward. Big fluctuation means merchants only use the coin as a medium for payment (i.e.: immediately exchange into BTC/FIAT). We need to make TAC "keep able"

Chat fee should be charge by a formula that can auto adjust the fee, the more valuable TAC is, the lower the Chat fee. Current TAC value proposition has a weakness. TAC is valuable because of decentralized Chat. No Chat traffic, equal not a useful technology, equal TAC has no value. Imaging exaggerated case when 1 TAC = 1 BTC, nobody is going to pay 0.01 TAC per chat. This means TAC value will not go above certain level. By the way, currently there is a charge of 1 TAC transaction fee on top of 0.01 TAC per chat (total 1.01 TAC). Too expensive to encourage Chat usage.
All Chat fee goes to marketing and promotion.

Just my 2 cents.

you are right because you have no point at all beside you wanting to dump your tac. what a supporter  

   right way

I'm setting these monkeys on ignore now. They'll stop eventually. I think.

lol, if your solution for that is to side with a scammer then you definitely a moron and that coin is dead

Nice disinformation k-miester, we would have to know about it first. Y
ou are so wise you are not even wondering why it is there hidden in the code and not easily accessed, nor publicized, not in the gui as for the reward.
Clearly that's strange as it should be the way for dev to get support from the community by asking the community to use this command.
(and being an open source dev, I know that to get support, sometimes you need to ask... people tends to forget easily that sort of thing.)

That show clearly he was the only one using it and voting to him up to 30% (nobody would ever do anything like that...)

Regarding the accusation that we set up dev and voting him that sort of money is so ridiculous (and you know it, which is you are as dishonest as the one you defend) that I don't even know why I answer this.

We weren't even part of the team at that time  

So again you are just making false accusation to defend a scam against those who want to get rid of that scam.

Thanks but I know I don't deserve to have respect from people like you. Please don't respect me, ever. Appreciate this.

AizenSou you have no respect here. You cannot save face no matter how much you try.
People are trying to pick up the pieces from what you have done and get back on with the coins future. Please let us get on with it.

If the vote was removed then what do you suggest as a dev reward?
I think the dev wants to do 0% but it would be good to know what people think anyway.
If we wanted to attract people to the team then having a reward would be useful. Also maybe for giveaways etc.

I personally don't think that any devs should be expected to work for free and a dev with some incentive is good for everyone.

This is what the whole community (including you) felt, votedev can be manipulated by anyone who could benefit from the dev fund. Take it off.

Bump.
That k-meister doesn't have the skills and the guts to directly answer my question. So could you, Talkdev ?

endless fighting makes the price lower and lower

BTW - the votedev command didn't trigger any name calling posts. The scammers triggered the posts, and they used votedev as a pretext for this. They knew votedev allows no more than 5% reward in the current code but they made it seem like it could be set to anything. I would be very unsurprised if they were the ones who upvoted the votedev reward in order to complain about it.