Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][THC] The Hempcoin (THC) - page 95. (Read 389163 times)

hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
@halofirebtc
January 14, 2015, 08:30:25 PM
-- REQUEST FOR COMMENTS --[/size]

I am a holder of some HempCoin from day 1, I am also a fan of the Crypto2.0 platform NXT
NXT released their monetary system which allows the creation of new currencies or transfer of existing ones.
http://nxt.org/about/monetary-system/
What do you guys think about putting HempCoin on the NXT platform?
It would offer us a lot of benefits.

agreed it could help thc, I'm not familiar with java based coins though. How secure is java, and how secure are coins made in java?
aws
full member
Activity: 219
Merit: 100
January 14, 2015, 06:47:39 AM
-- REQUEST FOR COMMENTS --[/size]

I am a holder of some HempCoin from day 1, I am also a fan of the Crypto2.0 platform NXT
NXT released their monetary system which allows the creation of new currencies or transfer of existing ones.
http://nxt.org/about/monetary-system/
What do you guys think about putting HempCoin on the NXT platform?
It would offer us a lot of benefits.
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
@halofirebtc
January 13, 2015, 04:56:46 PM
I'm using windows wallet, if that helps. v1.7.0.3
Most other coins like NLG, solo mined blocks are received to different addresses in one wallet, I was curious why my solo blocks in THC were all coming from one. Different addresses are what it's supposed to be (edit: I thought), to cover up and remain more anonymous. I didn't know if the code for THC was coded as such. Must have to do with the block-issuing nodes.

My coin.conf has 5 lines in it.

rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
rpcuser=xxxx
rpcpassword=xxxx
server=1
rpcport=11055

I don't mine on pools if i can help it, I stay true to the decentralization as much as possible. Nothing against anyone, it's the way it was meant to be.

sr. member
Activity: 1313
Merit: 302
January 13, 2015, 04:45:41 PM
no worries, I was just kidding.

odd, you only have one address.... I always wondered why my solo mined blocks showed as coming in on different addresses.  I thought that was normal and just accepted it and moved on.

Just when I think I am starting to get a better grasp on the blockchain.... a wrench gets thrown in.

one of these days, I will a find a tutorial and some spare time and learn the nitty gritty going on behind the scenes.

EDIT: oh and btw.... that means you have never mined on my pool  Sad  no worries  Grin
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
@halofirebtc
January 13, 2015, 04:41:46 PM
Sorry about the addition/edit, I thought I was quick enough with my afterthought. Oh well, lol.  Roll Eyes
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
@halofirebtc
January 13, 2015, 04:40:27 PM

Just a note: I have not sent any of my coins to anywhere. I own every single coin I've mined.

ok thanks, I suspected this as you said your transaction count was lower on the explorer.  Can you verify in your wallet transaction tab if any are showing up as unconfirmed ?


I assume you are searching on your wallet address in the wallet and then exporting to excel and seeing what line it ends on ?  that's what I am doing, but I think I have sent at least some coins from each of my addresses (dont know how I can tell either), so unable to confirm this.

if you don't have any unconfirmed transactions, I am at a loss for why they are different.

EDIT, after I quote, eh... hehe.  even though you have only solo mined, you probably have more than one address in your wallet.  do a listaddressgroupings in the console.  that will give you a list of all addresses on your wallet and the balance for each of them.  then search the transaction tab for that address and compare it with the explorer.

did: listaddressgroupings

1 address came up, same one and shows the balance I have in my wallet. There aren't any other addresses in my transactions tab either.
sr. member
Activity: 1313
Merit: 302
January 13, 2015, 04:32:45 PM

Just a note: I have not sent any of my coins to anywhere. I own every single coin I've mined.

ok thanks, I suspected this as you said your transaction count was lower on the explorer.  Can you verify in your wallet transaction tab if any are showing up as unconfirmed ?


I assume you are searching on your wallet address in the wallet and then exporting to excel and seeing what line it ends on ?  that's what I am doing, but I think I have sent at least some coins from each of my addresses (dont know how I can tell either), so unable to confirm this.

if you don't have any unconfirmed transactions, I am at a loss for why they are different.

EDIT, after I quote, eh... hehe.  even though you have only solo mined, you probably have more than one address in your wallet.  do a listaddressgroupings in the console.  that will give you a list of all addresses on your wallet and the balance for each of them.  then search the transaction tab for that address and compare it with the explorer.
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
@halofirebtc
January 13, 2015, 04:22:55 PM
Thank you both for confirming.

But that still leaves the question why my actual balance in my wallet doesn't match the explorer, I really didn't worry about it and I'm still not too concerned. Only reason I spoke up was because of the trex balance mystery, otherwise I still wouldn't care.

Edit: It's been incorrect for months, I've been watching it. deleted blockchain, doesn't do anything. Would extract private keys next, but I'm not on that level. But it still doesn't make sense since explorer shows more than what I have with less transactions. So weird, but whatever.


A couple things about the differences in transaction count.

a) The wallet transaction tab does not count transactions out of your wallet from the given address, the explorer is counting these transactions out.
     - your transaction tab will only show that you sent coins to Bittrex ( or where ever), and not which address sent them.

b) The wallet transaction tab could have unconfirmed transactions in there from a fork, the explorer would not count these.

For all my addresses, the explorer transaction count is higher due to reason a.

What do you think is the best way to represent the transaction count in a block explorer ?

1) show a total count like it is now.
2) only show transactions in count.
3) show both in and out transactions, have a counter for each.

I have no clue how hard it is to change the explorer to 2 or 3, I am more so just curious on what would be the ideal solution.

I certainly don't want to infer more work on killsig, as he has already put countless hours of his spare time into building this explorer from the ground up.


Just a note: I have not sent any of my coins to anywhere. I own every single coin I've mined. I have not bought any additional either, or sent anything to/from my wallet. Straight up solo mined to one address listed in my wallet.
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1004
January 13, 2015, 03:45:20 PM
BTC dropped hard today. Best move it all to THC. lol

I'll be back. I'm going to go buy a BTC. It's too cheap to pass up at these prices.

full member
Activity: 155
Merit: 100
January 13, 2015, 03:33:12 PM


this chart stopped in october.
would like to see more  Smiley

It is a lot of work to get that to work?


again thanks for this block explorer!
according to my wife that's the first thing I see in the morning and the last I see at night   Wink
(hope google translated correctly  Tongue )
sr. member
Activity: 1313
Merit: 302
January 13, 2015, 03:11:44 PM
Thank you both for confirming.

But that still leaves the question why my actual balance in my wallet doesn't match the explorer, I really didn't worry about it and I'm still not too concerned. Only reason I spoke up was because of the trex balance mystery, otherwise I still wouldn't care.

Edit: It's been incorrect for months, I've been watching it. deleted blockchain, doesn't do anything. Would extract private keys next, but I'm not on that level. But it still doesn't make sense since explorer shows more than what I have with less transactions. So weird, but whatever.


A couple things about the differences in transaction count.

a) The wallet transaction tab does not count transactions out of your wallet from the given address, the explorer is counting these transactions out.
     - your transaction tab will only show that you sent coins to Bittrex ( or where ever), and not which address sent them.

b) The wallet transaction tab could have unconfirmed transactions in there from a fork, the explorer would not count these.

For all my addresses, the explorer transaction count is higher due to reason a.

What do you think is the best way to represent the transaction count in a block explorer ?

1) show a total count like it is now.
2) only show transactions in count.
3) show both in and out transactions, have a counter for each.

I have no clue how hard it is to change the explorer to 2 or 3, I am more so just curious on what would be the ideal solution.

I certainly don't want to infer more work on killsig, as he has already put countless hours of his spare time into building this explorer from the ground up.
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
@halofirebtc
January 13, 2015, 02:38:27 PM
That's 2.5% of the total currency. Not too shabby, means people really believe in this coin to be holding so much off the exchanges.
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1004
January 13, 2015, 02:35:25 PM
Those are all trex balances. I can tell because I'm #4  Grin and it looks bang on.

yep those are bittrex balances for sure, mine is bang on too. you edged me out by one spot. :-) now i wanna buy more.

it would be a lot of work if they made actual richlists for every coin they have.

Assuming the charts are close to real time, this is quite an insightful chart to keep an eye on when trading.


4 million to be #1! I want to try for that also.

We need another 1 month lull where the price drops to 16 satoshi and millions of THC sell orders get lined up at cheap prices. Then I can be #1. After that there will be a block halving and 420 with bring some hype/media attention.


3.5 million top balance is pretty low. It shows this coin wasn't instamined by the dev like that satoshi person did to bitcoin by getting 21%. 3.5 million is only 1.5% of all the THC to be created.


hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
@halofirebtc
January 12, 2015, 11:55:24 PM
Thank you both for confirming.

But that still leaves the question why my actual balance in my wallet doesn't match the explorer, I really didn't worry about it and I'm still not too concerned. Only reason I spoke up was because of the trex balance mystery, otherwise I still wouldn't care.

Edit: It's been incorrect for months, I've been watching it. deleted blockchain, doesn't do anything. Would extract private keys next, but I'm not on that level. But it still doesn't make sense since explorer shows more than what I have with less transactions. So weird, but whatever.
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
@kryptographer
January 12, 2015, 11:43:56 PM
Those are all trex balances. I can tell because I'm #4  Grin and it looks bang on.

yep those are bittrex balances for sure, mine is bang on too. you edged me out by one spot. :-) now i wanna buy more.


Good luck, I'm going for that #1 spot  Wink
sr. member
Activity: 1313
Merit: 302
January 12, 2015, 11:30:48 PM
Those are all trex balances. I can tell because I'm #4  Grin and it looks bang on.

yep those are bittrex balances for sure, mine is bang on too. you edged me out by one spot. :-) now i wanna buy more.

it would be a lot of work if they made actual richlists for every coin they have.

Assuming the charts are close to real time, this is quite an insightful chart to keep an eye on when trading.
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
@kryptographer
January 12, 2015, 11:03:32 PM
Those are all trex balances. I can tell because I'm #4  Grin and it looks bang on.
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
@halofirebtc
January 12, 2015, 09:34:58 PM
Trex's richlist is nowhere close to OC's actual richlist, just so everyone knows when comparing their THC balances, since I see a problem. I will be tweeting about this to richie.

Addition: Here's what I tweeted, will provide his response:
@richiela Yo. Trex beta "richlist" isn't even close to real OC richlist. Does that mean the TOP 50 at beta trex are for balances on trex?


Sorry to use OC as the example, but it does relate to my problem above about the hempchain and my actual balance not being correct, and helps to solve the problem I have if beta trex is for trex balances. If THC had a richlist, I'd use that in this forum to diagnose.


Answer verified by community members, deleted tweet as well.
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
@halofirebtc
January 12, 2015, 09:03:09 PM
just found out that bittrex has a beta site that has a lot more information available about the markets:

https://beta.bittrex.com/Market/?MarketName=BTC-THC

I don't know much about it, therefore I would NOT do any trades on the beta site, but its neat to see all buy/sell orders.

You can also see all the bittrex-thc wallet balances too.

i like the distribution info



Ok. I'm officially confused. I'm not giving out my address, but my amount should be reflected in the bittrex top 50 which is close to what I have, and my ONE wallet key I've been solo mining to is off as well when compared to the hempchain explorer. All 3 amounts are non-matching. What gives?

I have no other transactions other than solo mining. No other addresses.

Edit: Trex to Hempchain is off by a few hundred. Hempchain says I should have more than what I really have by a little over 4000 THC, but with ~130 transactions less. Any way you look at it, something is not right.
full member
Activity: 155
Merit: 100
January 12, 2015, 05:38:24 PM
just found out that bittrex has a beta site that has a lot more information available about the markets:

https://beta.bittrex.com/Market/?MarketName=BTC-THC

I don't know much about it, therefore I would NOT do any trades on the beta site, but its neat to see all buy/sell orders.

You can also see all the bittrex-thc wallet balances too.

i like the distribution info

Pages:
Jump to: