Could we take LTC out of the switching pool? I lost over 2500 shares because the size of the current block causing them to 'expire'. I'm not sure why it's profitability is so high when the diff is up and LTC/BTC is down! It's good to help it along but not if the shares evaporate because of the round size!
Just my 0.02 LTC...
Topic: [ANN][The Original Multipool - Scrypt/SHA256/Scrypt-N/X11] multipool.us - page 252. (Read 424138 times)
June 11, 2013, 02:12:13 PM
June 11, 2013, 12:42:02 PM
An idea to raise money for the new server:
For every 10 LTC donated, you get 1 month of -10% fees (10% bonus)!
Someone with ~2200kH/s would get paid back in about 30 days (assuming everything stays as it is now). So it's basically a loan. Of course this will only work if you have enough people donating a % to cover the bonuses. Actually that favors people with higher hashrates and punishes those with lower. Hmm, maybe multiport should just have a 1% fee on it for the awesome service...
For every 10 LTC donated, you get 1 month of -10% fees (10% bonus)!
Someone with ~2200kH/s would get paid back in about 30 days (assuming everything stays as it is now). So it's basically a loan. Of course this will only work if you have enough people donating a % to cover the bonuses. Actually that favors people with higher hashrates and punishes those with lower. Hmm, maybe multiport should just have a 1% fee on it for the awesome service...
I thought about putting a fee on the multiport, unfortunately since it is a simple tcp redirect there is no way to reliably figure out who's using it let alone their hashrate and rewards.
I could switch to using stratum proxy rather than a redirect, I guess, or set up separate ports. But it would still require a decent amount of coding to implement.
June 11, 2013, 11:53:53 AM
An idea to raise money for the new server:
For every 10 LTC donated, you get 1 month of -10% fees (10% bonus)!
Someone with ~2200kH/s would get paid back in about 30 days (assuming everything stays as it is now). So it's basically a loan. Of course this will only work if you have enough people donating a % to cover the bonuses. Actually that favors people with higher hashrates and punishes those with lower. Hmm, maybe multiport should just have a 1% fee on it for the awesome service...
For every 10 LTC donated, you get 1 month of -10% fees (10% bonus)!
Someone with ~2200kH/s would get paid back in about 30 days (assuming everything stays as it is now). So it's basically a loan. Of course this will only work if you have enough people donating a % to cover the bonuses. Actually that favors people with higher hashrates and punishes those with lower. Hmm, maybe multiport should just have a 1% fee on it for the awesome service...
June 11, 2013, 11:22:43 AM
What is going on with FTC again?
Stats showing this: (confirmed/unconfirmed blocks are intermixed)
Where blocks 35529, 35501, 35462 orphaned?
Stats showing this: (confirmed/unconfirmed blocks are intermixed)
Code:
35,620 77 Tango 2013-06-11 07:52:44
35,566 Done vlad 2013-06-11 06:21:11
35,563 Done miner1234 2013-06-11 06:18:38
35,529 91 tr00g 2013-06-11 05:26:50
35,501 80 xorpheus 2013-06-11 04:32:42
35,462 119 roflmcsupsu 2013-06-11 03:30:10
35,451 Done tokanbulu 2013-06-11 03:16:06
Where blocks 35529, 35501, 35462 orphaned?
Ahh, I see what happened.. I wasn't pulling enough transactions in the script, to update the confirms on those blocks. They should be fixed now.
June 11, 2013, 11:03:31 AM
What is going on with FTC again?
Stats showing this: (confirmed/unconfirmed blocks are intermixed)
Where blocks 35529, 35501, 35462 orphaned?
Stats showing this: (confirmed/unconfirmed blocks are intermixed)
Code:
35,620 77 Tango 2013-06-11 07:52:44
35,566 Done vlad 2013-06-11 06:21:11
35,563 Done miner1234 2013-06-11 06:18:38
35,529 91 tr00g 2013-06-11 05:26:50
35,501 80 xorpheus 2013-06-11 04:32:42
35,462 119 roflmcsupsu 2013-06-11 03:30:10
35,451 Done tokanbulu 2013-06-11 03:16:06
Where blocks 35529, 35501, 35462 orphaned?
June 11, 2013, 11:02:18 AM
I just cleared out the FTC unconfirmed balances from the last of the orphans the other day. If you noticed your unconfirmed balance dropped, this is the reason.
June 11, 2013, 10:52:41 AM
I had work drop out a couple times last night as well, running guiminer on multiport. Restarting the connection fixed it at the time. This morning it seems no errors occurred overnight, as it is still happily hashing away.
June 11, 2013, 10:49:04 AM
I have a issue I'm not sure how to resolve, it appears that when the multi port pool switches coins, my miner is hanging. Start it up and its going fine say on FTC, then pool switches to MNC,cgminer shows I am connected but is not getting work? Running 3.2.1
The pool is listed as alive and I am connected, but I don't get the new work.
The pool is listed as alive and I am connected, but I don't get the new work.
Unfortunately I haven't been able to get any cgminer 3.x version working, it crashes immediately on both of my rigs so I am still on 2.11.3 which doesn't have any issues switching. Maybe someone else who is running 3.x can help.
I'm running cgminer 3.1. I did have trouble with latest SDK/Catalyst drivers - it was crashing on me when cgminer was starting. So my solution was to downgrade SDK/drivers: I used AMD removal tool and then installed different Catalyst drivers with different SDK.
I'm running Catalyst 13.1 on my Windows 7 Pro 64 machine with 7xxx cards and Catalyst 12.8 on Windows 7 home 32 machine with 5xxx cards (with SDK manually downgraded to 2.5 SDK)
June 11, 2013, 10:40:08 AM
I also had 2 miners disconnect last night, one around 03:00 and the other around 06:00 MST. Couldn't find any info on your site that shows when coin swaps occur, so can't say for sure it's that. They were also the only 2 of my 5 that I've upgraded to cgminer 3.2.0 vs 3.1.0, but that could be a coincidence. I'm guessing if I add a failover pool it won't be an issue.
Good luck getting funds for your own servers, the more coins you can get running, the better! You should really get some visual display on the stat pages for donors (the crown next to my name is cool too
). Like maybe a star (of different colors if you want tiers) to the right of the name. Get that peer pressure working for you!
Good luck getting funds for your own servers, the more coins you can get running, the better! You should really get some visual display on the stat pages for donors (the crown next to my name is cool too
). Like maybe a star (of different colors if you want tiers) to the right of the name. Get that peer pressure working for you! June 11, 2013, 10:38:16 AM
I have a issue I'm not sure how to resolve, it appears that when the multi port pool switches coins, my miner is hanging. Start it up and its going fine say on FTC, then pool switches to MNC,cgminer shows I am connected but is not getting work? Running 3.2.1
The pool is listed as alive and I am connected, but I don't get the new work.
The pool is listed as alive and I am connected, but I don't get the new work.
Unfortunately I haven't been able to get any cgminer 3.x version working, it crashes immediately on both of my rigs so I am still on 2.11.3 which doesn't have any issues switching. Maybe someone else who is running 3.x can help.
June 11, 2013, 08:56:22 AM
Its not every time, looks like we went from MNC to FTC, and it is still working.
I actually had a hang up as well. I think it was due to a disconnect but I'm not 100% sure on that...
June 11, 2013, 08:54:08 AM
Its not every time, looks like we went from MNC to FTC, and it is still working.
June 11, 2013, 08:52:01 AM
I have a issue I'm not sure how to resolve, it appears that when the multi port pool switches coins, my miner is hanging. Start it up and its going fine say on FTC, then pool switches to MNC,cgminer shows I am connected but is not getting work? Running 3.2.1
The pool is listed as alive and I am connected, but I don't get the new work.
The pool is listed as alive and I am connected, but I don't get the new work.
June 11, 2013, 05:33:55 AM
Looking good, trying your pool for a bit
June 11, 2013, 02:41:46 AM
Add margin-top:20px; to your header-wrapper - it will look much better.
June 11, 2013, 02:03:01 AM
Just noticed you implemented auto-switching/multiport. I've struggled on the technical side of re-routing miner traffic to specific pool clients for many hours (didn't help I was trying to do it in Ruby since I know zero Python). Now that you've got it working, I can forget that idea and use your service exclusively. Well done, worth donating for!
Just one question: what are you basing profitability on? Adjusted-for-stales like on coinchoose?
OK, 2 questions: Any plans to take it 1 step further and auto-convert all coin payouts to BTC (via trade APIs)? That would let miners be assured of actually taking advantage of the high profitability, not having to sell later risking a lower price. It could be an optional account setting, and would probably necessitate some fee to cover expenses/risks.
Just one question: what are you basing profitability on? Adjusted-for-stales like on coinchoose?
OK, 2 questions: Any plans to take it 1 step further and auto-convert all coin payouts to BTC (via trade APIs)? That would let miners be assured of actually taking advantage of the high profitability, not having to sell later risking a lower price. It could be an optional account setting, and would probably necessitate some fee to cover expenses/risks.
Both of these were answered previously:
1) Yes, stales are adjusted for (I brought up the 15% I get on some coins and he said it's dealt with already)
2) No plans for auto converting to BTC
Thanks, too many pages up in here
No problem!
June 11, 2013, 01:57:36 AM
Just noticed you implemented auto-switching/multiport. I've struggled on the technical side of re-routing miner traffic to specific pool clients for many hours (didn't help I was trying to do it in Ruby since I know zero Python). Now that you've got it working, I can forget that idea and use your service exclusively. Well done, worth donating for!
Just one question: what are you basing profitability on? Adjusted-for-stales like on coinchoose?
OK, 2 questions: Any plans to take it 1 step further and auto-convert all coin payouts to BTC (via trade APIs)? That would let miners be assured of actually taking advantage of the high profitability, not having to sell later risking a lower price. It could be an optional account setting, and would probably necessitate some fee to cover expenses/risks.
Just one question: what are you basing profitability on? Adjusted-for-stales like on coinchoose?
OK, 2 questions: Any plans to take it 1 step further and auto-convert all coin payouts to BTC (via trade APIs)? That would let miners be assured of actually taking advantage of the high profitability, not having to sell later risking a lower price. It could be an optional account setting, and would probably necessitate some fee to cover expenses/risks.
Both of these were answered previously:
1) Yes, stales are adjusted for (I brought up the 15% I get on some coins and he said it's dealt with already)
2) No plans for auto converting to BTC
Thanks, too many pages up in here
June 11, 2013, 01:42:37 AM
Just noticed you implemented auto-switching/multiport. I've struggled on the technical side of re-routing miner traffic to specific pool clients for many hours (didn't help I was trying to do it in Ruby since I know zero Python). Now that you've got it working, I can forget that idea and use your service exclusively. Well done, worth donating for!
Just one question: what are you basing profitability on? Adjusted-for-stales like on coinchoose?
OK, 2 questions: Any plans to take it 1 step further and auto-convert all coin payouts to BTC (via trade APIs)? That would let miners be assured of actually taking advantage of the high profitability, not having to sell later risking a lower price. It could be an optional account setting, and would probably necessitate some fee to cover expenses/risks.
Just one question: what are you basing profitability on? Adjusted-for-stales like on coinchoose?
OK, 2 questions: Any plans to take it 1 step further and auto-convert all coin payouts to BTC (via trade APIs)? That would let miners be assured of actually taking advantage of the high profitability, not having to sell later risking a lower price. It could be an optional account setting, and would probably necessitate some fee to cover expenses/risks.
Both of these were answered previously:
1) Yes, stales are adjusted for (I brought up the 15% I get on some coins and he said it's dealt with already)
2) No plans for auto converting to BTC
June 11, 2013, 01:39:44 AM
Just noticed you implemented auto-switching/multiport. I've struggled on the technical side of re-routing miner traffic to specific pool clients for many hours (didn't help I was trying to do it in Ruby since I know zero Python). Now that you've got it working, I can forget that idea and use your service exclusively. Well done, worth donating for!
Just one question: what are you basing profitability on? Adjusted-for-stales like on coinchoose?
OK, 2 questions: Any plans to take it 1 step further and auto-convert all coin payouts to BTC (via trade APIs)? That would let miners be assured of actually taking advantage of the high profitability, not having to sell later risking a lower price. It could be an optional account setting, and would probably necessitate some fee to cover expenses/risks.
Just one question: what are you basing profitability on? Adjusted-for-stales like on coinchoose?
OK, 2 questions: Any plans to take it 1 step further and auto-convert all coin payouts to BTC (via trade APIs)? That would let miners be assured of actually taking advantage of the high profitability, not having to sell later risking a lower price. It could be an optional account setting, and would probably necessitate some fee to cover expenses/risks.
June 11, 2013, 12:56:33 AM
Check that you are not double-paying us... FTC shares...
The top 10 miners are listed twice...
micabg 10.1936 13854
micabg 10.1936 13854
kayot 7.2063 9794
kayot 7.2063 9794
sbk1 6.8075 9252
sbk1 6.8075 9252
dwqwog 5.6648 7699
dwqwog 5.6648 7699
rqdxrocket 5.4478 7404
rqdxrocket 5.4478 7404
Just wasn't sure if it was a DB read error... or if it thinks there are twice as many of us. (It was only that table.)
The top 10 miners are listed twice...
micabg 10.1936 13854
micabg 10.1936 13854
kayot 7.2063 9794
kayot 7.2063 9794
sbk1 6.8075 9252
sbk1 6.8075 9252
dwqwog 5.6648 7699
dwqwog 5.6648 7699
rqdxrocket 5.4478 7404
rqdxrocket 5.4478 7404
Just wasn't sure if it was a DB read error... or if it thinks there are twice as many of us. (It was only that table.)
Well that's a new and interesting bug.. FTC is definitely not getting double paid, but I'll look into it when I get a second. Of course, it'll probably be gone by then.
There were just several copies of the estimates script running, that's all. I don't know how they got around flock.
Jump to: