Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][UMC] Unity Matrix Commons - Democratized Risk Management - page 24. (Read 65506 times)

full member
Activity: 420
Merit: 100
Will it have zombies

And Milla Jovovich as a PR ambassador =))
newbie
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
Though with a slightly creepy name, I'm sure it's an interesting project, they will not make us into zombies, right ?, really interesting idea, I hope this project continues to grow, I wait for bounty, soon, good luck dev
Bounty Thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.20195463
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Will it have zombies

 Grin Dude I'm saying!
Honestly the name got me interested and I love this idea but all I could think of at first was [This is a front for making bio weapons]  Roll Eyes

member
Activity: 170
Merit: 10
Though with a slightly creepy name, I'm sure it's an interesting project, they will not make us into zombies, right ?, really interesting idea, I hope this project continues to grow, I wait for bounty, soon, good luck dev
full member
Activity: 144
Merit: 100
Your manifest against the current insurance system is pertinent and interesting, but how do you want to reduce those flaws? Do you and your team intend to offer this product to whom? People who attend this forum bet that not even 1% have insurance.

Thanks for reading  Smiley

I'm not sure I agree that only 1% have insurance. I know in at least the US and Canada there are car insurance mandates. We posted some links on our twitter about business insurance in Asia being unpopular due to cost and rising insurance premiums in the UK. At worst, people are aware of insurance, but there may be other reasons why they don't pursue it like confusion of language or cost. I think insurance can very much be a reactive industry around the world, and we are trying to make it a proactive industry. If things are affordable, transparent, and provide real benefit then we're confident it will attract users. We think the first step of this is giving people a real headway into the hidden costs of traditional insurance. If we can offer any coverage, or augment existing coverage, it's better than no coverage. We reviewed the prospect of launching something to compete with insurance, but that is a risky endeavor, at least initially. There are tons of social/legal/logistical issues to deal with offering government approved insurance.

Thanks for your questions!
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Your manifest against the current insurance system is pertinent and interesting, but how do you want to reduce those flaws? Do you and your team intend to offer this product to whom? People who attend this forum bet that not even 1% have insurance.

Are a internet thug?

Mihawk
I get what your saying but from what I can gather the product is meant to help alleviate insurance overhead. I honestly can see it doing more then this that is if its not locked to specific cases or to insurance policy in general. Also where I live if your company has more then 40 employees you have to have a limited insurance policy and they are horribly over priced in all areas ....thanks Obama  Angry

BitFarmer75
I don't think he meant to be a thug perhaps he's curious to know who can actually use the product.
newbie
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
Your manifest against the current insurance system is pertinent and interesting, but how do you want to reduce those flaws? Do you and your team intend to offer this product to whom? People who attend this forum bet that not even 1% have insurance.
I don't appreciate this comment. What do you mean, " People who attend this forum bet that not even 1% have insurance?" I have a lot of medical problems and I do have insurance. I'm here looking at this coin to help pay for co pays for things that I can't pay for.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Your manifest against the current insurance system is pertinent and interesting, but how do you want to reduce those flaws? Do you and your team intend to offer this product to whom? People who attend this forum bet that not even 1% have insurance.

Are a internet thug?
sr. member
Activity: 1149
Merit: 347
Your manifest against the current insurance system is pertinent and interesting, but how do you want to reduce those flaws? Do you and your team intend to offer this product to whom? People who attend this forum bet that not even 1% have insurance.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Sorry but we already have WeTrust for what you are trying to do with this project . I recommend you to sell your insanely overpriced tokens after the ICO and buy WeTrust tokens or better keep the ETH.
it s good to have choice isnt it?

Choices are always good. My pick is umbrella coin.
full member
Activity: 420
Merit: 100
Sorry but we already have WeTrust for what you are trying to do with this project . I recommend you to sell your insanely overpriced tokens after the ICO and buy WeTrust tokens or better keep the ETH.
it s good to have choice isnt it?
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
sr. member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 253
Undeads.com - P2E Runner Game
Thank you for receiving my participation in social media bounty facebook.
 A good name and a good project. Good luck; Wink
full member
Activity: 144
Merit: 100
Hey everyone!

I just wanted to give a quick update on what the dev team has been working on. Our team has grown quite a lot over the last week, and people have been ramping up on the existing code base and our proposed architecture. Some of the devs have been on vacation, so we’re hoping to have a “hackathon” this upcoming weekend to really make some headway into a prototype and at least have some basic workflows working.

On Friday, we met and discussed some of the outstanding questions regarding the community, fairness in voting, and the optimal way to launch. We ended up taking a lot of notes on a napkin :-) http://i.imgur.com/RiIbX0w.jpg

We agree that limiting the maximum/minimum payouts initially is a good idea until we reach equilibrium in the float pool. We also had very interesting discussions about how votes should be weighed, how to incentivize people to vote on claims, and minimum votes required to pay out. We are leaning against weighing votes — that could devolve into an oligarchy type situation. Those with the biggest policies, the most reputation, or otherwise the greatest vote weights could be in a position of tremendous power. We want to avoid introducing this unfairness and really let the community evolve organically. We are also leaning towards policyholders paying a small fee in UMC with that paid out to users voting on their claim. This fee will be used to pay people to vote on the claim. We like this idea for two reasons. A) It incentivizes people to vote on claims which have fewer votes — this means they get a bigger piece of the fee than a vote that has many votes. Avoiding a flat payout encourages participation distributed across claims. B) It will discourage people from submitting fraudulent claims — they would have to pay the fee and, if their fraud was discovered, they would lose their policy entirely. In the same vein of community growth and reaching a consensus, we want the community to have a forum for discussion for each claim. We want theme to share information and allow their expertise in certain areas to show. We also want to prevent users from submitting duplicate claims, or submitting duplicate evidence across accounts. We’re thinking of having a “similarity score” between two claims based on the parameters submitted when making a claim (amount, area, day of occurrence etc.) and the data they submit (receipt, video, photo) and giving that information to users.

The team is really excited to build this product and get something working and able to be used by the community quickly. We want to surface as much information as possible to let the community reach a consensus in a fair and reasonable manner, and build on this system going forward.

Thanks for your continued support!
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
New brief video about UMC. Tell us what you think! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siCs8_QVgio

Thanks for your continued support!

Hey Umbrella,
Your updates seem to be consistent, the new website looks great and the video is pretty good.
Excited about although I still have questions.
Do you plan on adding any more services to your client once it up and running?


We plan on launching the client in the October timeframe, and being feature complete by February. Our goals are basically to have a prototype working by or before the crowdfund and have something functionally complete for policies/claims voting by October. When we say "feature complete" we're talking more about community interface, discussion forums, auto detection/rejection of policies and things that are "nice to have" but not required for our initial launch. Obviously, we're also going to take into account any pain points or areas of improvement suggested by the community or other empirical evidence. Thanks for the questions.

In other news, we were featured on a blog that rated us a 9.2/10 and worth adding to your portfolio. Thanks for the continued support! http://cryptocurrencieshub.com/umbrella-coin-democratized-insurance/

Wonderful!
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
New brief video about UMC. Tell us what you think! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siCs8_QVgio

Thanks for your continued support!

Hey Umbrella,
Your updates seem to be consistent, the new website looks great and the video is pretty good.
Excited about although I still have questions.
Do you plan on adding any more services to your client once it up and running?
full member
Activity: 144
Merit: 100
New brief video about UMC. Tell us what you think! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siCs8_QVgio

Thanks for your continued support!
hero member
Activity: 1848
Merit: 530
The OGz Club
Polish translation available here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.20309488

Best of luck with the ICO!
Pages:
Jump to: