If the photo is jpeg then the quality causes it.
Topic: [ANN][URO] A Real Long Term Currency: 1 Uro = 1 Metric Tonne Urea Fertilizer - page 129. (Read 247330 times)
July 08, 2014, 11:47:48 AM
Quality degrades at the same rate for all elements if nothing has been modified ... if the program shows that different elements of a photo have different rates of degradation then something is odd ...
July 08, 2014, 11:47:26 AM
A Real Long Term Currency..
I bought some cheap URO
I bought some cheap URO
July 08, 2014, 11:44:41 AM
This coin is getting interesting
July 08, 2014, 11:42:29 AM
If the photo is jpeg then the quality causes it.
July 08, 2014, 11:41:50 AM
Here a rough draft of a logo idea I came up with
I think bringing some earthy elements into it is more friendly and less sterile.
I think bringing some earthy elements into it is more friendly and less sterile.
I like it very much!
July 08, 2014, 11:35:51 AM
Cops, FBI, NSA use it all the time as a first pass sniff test tool before they get serious with their heavy in-house analysis tools. It takes an expert to really read the results; I'm hoping one passes through the forum to give his thoughts.
FYI for comparison take a screenshot of your screen right now and upload it to the forensics site, it shows the same kinds of artifacts. Someone posted the same kind of thing to the VRC thread when they were modifying their wallet for Verisend to try and 'prove' manipulation.
Either way the original document has obviously been modified to obfuscate details and add the watermarks etc, so not sure what you would gain from using that site?
Either way the original document has obviously been modified to obfuscate details and add the watermarks etc, so not sure what you would gain from using that site?
July 08, 2014, 11:35:44 AM
How about instead of continuing to feed the troll you guys answer a legitimate question from a potential investor...
The dev has been identified. You can go on the official GES website and see pictures of when they signed the contract, he is the the guy in the red shirt Is the dev of this coin anonymous? It seems like they would need to be identified for this to be legit. I mean, who is doing all the correspondence with the companies?
July 08, 2014, 11:33:21 AM
Is the dev of this coin anonymous? It seems like they would need to be identified for this to be legit. I mean, who is doing all the correspondence with the companies?
bump.
My name is Bohan Huang. I have been public since 2 months ago. Come on #URO FreeNode IRC for verification, there are 80+ people here to confirm this.
Thank you, I appreciate the response. And thank you to all the other people who answered as well.
July 08, 2014, 11:32:03 AM
of course it was modified, they added a water mark on it so people couldn't use it to scam other people. this is sensitive document which required a lot of work to get the green light to publish it, just to stop people from fudding.
Obviously the URO coin logo didn't exist in 2012 either.
If you run Obama's birth certificate through these things you get the same stuff. Anything which is digitally copied from another digital copy will reveal such anomalies.
July 08, 2014, 11:31:04 AM
I'm not trying to spread FUD, I like coins worth $300 a coin that are now $2.00 or so. I want to buy many and buy a Lambo.
I just don't want to be scammed.
Run the document image through this site:
http://www.fotoforensics.com
If the link holds (I'm not if or for how long the site holds results. If the link is dead, run it yourself.) This is the result:
It seems to show signs of modification/change other than the blackouts.
An expert in this stuff should give an opinion. This is how the Veilcoin scam was revealed.
There's evidence of something completely removed at the bottom and the "BB&T" a the top definitely seems photoshopped in.
The giant "Uro" text element was definitely Photoshopped in at some point.
The coloration of the wording on the right isn't exactly the same as the rest which also is apparently evidence of Photoshopping.
Again, I'm not an expert with this. The best way to take away any doubts is for the devs to post the entire document and just deal with the privacy issues. If this coin works they're about to be top story in the world media so that ship is about to sail anyway.
Like some poster said, if someone is buying something at a store the people selling it won't go far if the sales girls don't answer the buyer's reasonable questions.
of course it was modified, they added a water mark on it so people couldn't use it to scam other people. this is sensitive document which required a lot of work to get the green light to publish it, just to stop people from fudding. I just don't want to be scammed.
Run the document image through this site:
http://www.fotoforensics.com
If the link holds (I'm not if or for how long the site holds results. If the link is dead, run it yourself.) This is the result:
It seems to show signs of modification/change other than the blackouts.
An expert in this stuff should give an opinion. This is how the Veilcoin scam was revealed.
There's evidence of something completely removed at the bottom and the "BB&T" a the top definitely seems photoshopped in.
The giant "Uro" text element was definitely Photoshopped in at some point.
The coloration of the wording on the right isn't exactly the same as the rest which also is apparently evidence of Photoshopping.
Again, I'm not an expert with this. The best way to take away any doubts is for the devs to post the entire document and just deal with the privacy issues. If this coin works they're about to be top story in the world media so that ship is about to sail anyway.
Like some poster said, if someone is buying something at a store the people selling it won't go far if the sales girls don't answer the buyer's reasonable questions.
July 08, 2014, 11:30:41 AM
FYI for comparison take a screenshot of your screen right now and upload it to the forensics site, it shows the same kinds of artifacts. Someone posted the same kind of thing to the VRC thread when they were modifying their wallet for Verisend to try and 'prove' manipulation.
Either way the original document has obviously been modified to obfuscate details and add the watermarks etc, so not sure what you would gain from using that site?
Either way the original document has obviously been modified to obfuscate details and add the watermarks etc, so not sure what you would gain from using that site?
July 08, 2014, 11:28:27 AM
Is the dev of this coin anonymous? It seems like they would need to be identified for this to be legit. I mean, who is doing all the correspondence with the companies?
bump.
My name is Bohan Huang. I have been public since 2 months ago. Come on #URO FreeNode IRC for verification, there are 80+ people here to confirm this.
July 08, 2014, 11:24:54 AM
I'm not trying to spread FUD, I like coins worth $300 a coin that are now $2.00 or so. I want to buy many and buy a Lambo.
I just don't want to be scammed.
Run the document image through this site:
http://www.fotoforensics.com
If the link holds (I'm not if or for how long the site holds results. If the link is dead, run it yourself.) This is the result:
It seems to show signs of modification/change other than the blackouts.
An expert in this stuff should give an opinion. This is how the Veilcoin scam was revealed.
There's evidence of something completely removed at the bottom and the "BB&T" a the top definitely seems photoshopped in.
The giant "Uro" text element was definitely Photoshopped in at some point.
The coloration of the wording on the right isn't exactly the same as the rest which also is apparently evidence of Photoshopping.
Again, I'm not an expert with this. The best way to take away any doubts is for the devs to post the entire document and just deal with the privacy issues. If this coin works they're about to be top story in the world media so that ship is about to sail anyway.
Like some poster said, if someone is buying something at a store the people selling it won't go far if the sales girls don't answer the buyer's reasonable questions.
I just don't want to be scammed.
Run the document image through this site:
http://www.fotoforensics.com
If the link holds (I'm not if or for how long the site holds results. If the link is dead, run it yourself.) This is the result:
It seems to show signs of modification/change other than the blackouts.
An expert in this stuff should give an opinion. This is how the Veilcoin scam was revealed.
There's evidence of something completely removed at the bottom and the "BB&T" a the top definitely seems photoshopped in.
The giant "Uro" text element was definitely Photoshopped in at some point.
The coloration of the wording on the right isn't exactly the same as the rest which also is apparently evidence of Photoshopping.
Again, I'm not an expert with this. The best way to take away any doubts is for the devs to post the entire document and just deal with the privacy issues. If this coin works they're about to be top story in the world media so that ship is about to sail anyway.
Like some poster said, if someone is buying something at a store the people selling it won't go far if the sales girls don't answer the buyer's reasonable questions.
July 08, 2014, 11:24:45 AM
How about instead of continuing to feed the troll you guys answer a legitimate question from a potential investor...
Is the dev of this coin anonymous? It seems like they would need to be identified for this to be legit. I mean, who is doing all the correspondence with the companies?
The 'Dev' registered his posting account to create this thread. There is no evidence he has posted in any other threads.
So, yes, I'd say he's anonymous in the traditional sense that most altcoin Devs are.
July 08, 2014, 11:22:59 AM
How about instead of continuing to feed the troll you guys answer a legitimate question from a potential investor...
Is the dev of this coin anonymous? It seems like they would need to be identified for this to be legit. I mean, who is doing all the correspondence with the companies?
As quoted in an earlier thread
"My name is Bohan Huang and I am the Director of IT at Green Earth Systems Pty Ltd, which is a wholly owned Australian subsidiary of Green Earth Systems Limited (a Hong Kong company)."
July 08, 2014, 11:20:39 AM
How about instead of continuing to feed the troll you guys answer a legitimate question from a potential investor...
Is the dev of this coin anonymous? It seems like they would need to be identified for this to be legit. I mean, who is doing all the correspondence with the companies?
July 08, 2014, 11:19:12 AM
turthful, you must have no life to spend every second here coming up with crazy claims (most of them do not even make sense), can you please just leave man, either invest or don`t, do real research instead of all these stupid remarks and comments about nothing, you sir have proved nothing from all this other then the fact you probably have no real life friends and I can see why, stop wasting my time I read all post in this forum and you have wasted so much of my life just stop please man, you are wrong, go do the research yourself, thanks, I will even ship you 1 mt of urea to your doorstep, now ninja vanish please.
July 08, 2014, 11:18:25 AM
Hit 0.01btc to today
July 08, 2014, 11:16:38 AM
Is the dev of this coin anonymous? It seems like they would need to be identified for this to be legit. I mean, who is doing all the correspondence with the companies?
bump.
Blah blah blah.. Stop quoting that long string of shit and blocking out my question.. This has probably been answered already but I don't feel like digging through the entire thread.
July 08, 2014, 11:15:22 AM
haha this guy is just making a complete fool of himself.
Jump to: