not sure why no one is interested in this, just saying...
? what do you see?
i think people might not know what they are looking at so let me help out a little bit. you think the guy in the video chat looked like the twitter photo? of course he did. it's called photoshop.
so here's what you can see with the visible eye.
look at the shadow behind his head. why doesn't it effect the greenearth logo?
why does he appear to be looking in a totally different direction than everybody else?
why does he appear to be leaning against a wall when there is no wall there, only a banner.
his entire lighting is different than the other 3 men in the photo.
if you can't see any of that. here's the error level analysis. this ones the obvious kicker.
https://i.imgur.com/uYITly5.pngwirerogue,
you present an interesting path of digital forensics. Would you kindly provide answers to the following:
1: Are you formally qualified in digital forensic examination and reporting?
2: if so, please confirm any formally recognised formal qualifications and when those were gained.
3; please present any formal experience you have attained in the field of digital forensics
4: for the site you reference to, being
http://www.fotoforensics.com, which in its FAQ, makes this statement:
This free service is available to everyone. It is intended to give people an introduction to digital photo forensics and image analysis. This site does not draw conclusions or interpret results; it just shows raw data. As such, the algorithms on this free service are not intended for commercial or illegal uses. FotoForensics takes no responsibility for inaccurate, incorrect, or misleading analysis interpretations. Would you be so kind as to provide a detailed means for your analysis, the forensic procedure for how it is formed, and what weight do you place on your own posting to not be inaccurate, incorrect, or misleading analysis interpretations for what you have presented.
looking forward to a civil and detailed response.
TIA
