Yes, we mistakenly credited POS blocks as POW blocks... because they appear in the wallet exactly the same as POW mined blocks, and because the ANN post described POW mining as block 0-block 20160, with rewards for all of those blocks. But, that isn't the case as everyone can now see: less than 50% of those blocks were POW with block rewards, as indicated by the total coin supply of ~9.6M currently compared to the claimed total of 20M.
POW and POS blocks appear the same in the wallet for a pool mining the coin -- they show as "generate" blocks. The only way to differentiate between them is to do blockchain analysis and review the input and output of the block and see if the addresses are the same with the same transaction amount with POS interest added.
POW and POS blocks appear the same in the wallet for a pool mining the coin -- they show as "generate" blocks. The only way to differentiate between them is to do blockchain analysis and review the input and output of the block and see if the addresses are the same with the same transaction amount with POS interest added.
Yeahhhh - gonna say that they did mess it up, you got this point
however I'm wondering why other multipools(as I know hashcows and wafflepool, maybe more) did not occur the same problem you had...
He didn t pay attention. That was his problem. He assumed it was the same as other POW+POS coins.
he said he had to buy UVC to fill the void. He doesn t have a multipool.
