What I'd like to know is how you plan to implement my Proof-Of-Audit theory, as it's my theory. You have no way to describe it outside of my own writings, bordering on plagiarism.
Funny to see coins already pretending to use features we're developing in house.
Also, about your coin:
Will you be staking the premine for your 1500% ROI period?
If not, how do we know you won't?
Actually, nevermind, I've already got the answer to my question.
The vestx premine is being split up and spread out and staked under different accounts. The premine is not just a premine, it's now being staked to exploit the 1500% ROI.
The developer does not mention this.
Note: the block explorer does not generate proper links, so you must use the IP.
Transaction PREMINE sends to RANDOM ACCOUNT [U1V...]:
http://167.99.179.149:3005/tx/842d9ac494fb21d3df7bc73a061b243d0e2e45acb7983f6a71d9d2e78eab78d9
Random account now STAKING:
http://167.99.179.149:3005/address/U1VjZpqZyM5hA32RSoSX6k4qQ6AKity1t4
The above TX is from the premine, sending part of the premine to a random account, which is now staking. I believe this is likely happening alot, and the current VestX developer is simply taking his time splitting it up to dump on buyers.
The Vestx premine is being staked and likely being sold on the market.
This coin does not have the ability to implement proof of audit, which is my own theory. Be warned about this project and any others trying to piggyback off Peepcoin-DAPS, especially ones like this which plagiarize features and make promises they cannot actually achieve.
first staking rate is 100% now.Funny to see coins already pretending to use features we're developing in house.
Also, about your coin:
Will you be staking the premine for your 1500% ROI period?
If not, how do we know you won't?
Actually, nevermind, I've already got the answer to my question.
The vestx premine is being split up and spread out and staked under different accounts. The premine is not just a premine, it's now being staked to exploit the 1500% ROI.
The developer does not mention this.
Note: the block explorer does not generate proper links, so you must use the IP.
Transaction PREMINE sends to RANDOM ACCOUNT [U1V...]:
http://167.99.179.149:3005/tx/842d9ac494fb21d3df7bc73a061b243d0e2e45acb7983f6a71d9d2e78eab78d9
Random account now STAKING:
http://167.99.179.149:3005/address/U1VjZpqZyM5hA32RSoSX6k4qQ6AKity1t4
The above TX is from the premine, sending part of the premine to a random account, which is now staking. I believe this is likely happening alot, and the current VestX developer is simply taking his time splitting it up to dump on buyers.
The Vestx premine is being staked and likely being sold on the market.
This coin does not have the ability to implement proof of audit, which is my own theory. Be warned about this project and any others trying to piggyback off Peepcoin-DAPS, especially ones like this which plagiarize features and make promises they cannot actually achieve.
secondly we are not staking you appear to be daps fanboy.
https://github.com/VestxCoin/Vestx/blob/master/src/main.cpp
You were one of the only people staking during the high-inflation period. Care to prove me wrong?
Additionally, you're not staking the premine right now? Then who is staking your premine coins, VestX developer? Did you sell them in a private sale?
Are the links I showed above not directly linking your premine to other accounts, where you moved your massive premine to attempt to hide staking in high inflation 1500% period?
Be warned of no-name developers lying about staking a massive premine. Also; be aware this "developer" is actively plagiarizing my writings, pretending to have any knowledge of my Proof Of Audit work algo.
We did stake during high inflation period yes but it was airdropped. our address is the top address soon to be burned.
secondly there if there was a transfer it was to pay devs with existing coin small amount to not have affect the market in case they dump.
we have a name and we choose to stay hidden until the project is well established does yours have a team? we didn't copy your white-paper if we cant implement proof of audit then it will be removed. we have more features thats more interesting than that.
there is no need to attack us.
