To be honest, I am not exactly sure what everyone was expecting when MsCollec initially announced the anon exchange. I think a lot of people got anon exchange and VootMarket mixed up, they're two completely different platforms. When the Anon exchange was first announced what I expected was a crypto exchange powered by Voot management with proceeds going towards future development and/or stabilization of the price of Voot. You guys ask the same questions over and over expecting a different answer when the bottom line is that everyone should be patient. Whale123 and myself have done all we can in providing updates for everyone, we are not devs and we are certaintly not magicians that can make things appear whenever you want. At this point I think most people leaving are just people who are angry because they couldn't get a quick enough pump and dump.
+1
One of the most important things I've learned about FUD during my time in crypto is that it usually comes down to expectations. It is the job of the PR team of the coin to properly manage its community's and its investors' expectations. It is also the job of the community to manage and self-regulate its own expectations.
The problem with VOOT has been that MsCollec up until a week or so ago had been serving both as developer and a sort of PR figure for VOOT. MsCollec is a great dev, but not so great at PR. Expectations regarding the Anon Exchange were mismanaged, investors and community members began to expect things that were never intended to be, outlandish expectations were not met, wild accusations of fraud and scams began to fly, MsCollec felt attacked, and, well, you know the story.
Well, we have a PR team now and they are doing their best to clean up the pieces but wild expectations and accusations still run rampant.
How can we as a community better self-regulate our own expectations?