Topic: [ANN][VRC] VeriCoin Proof of Stake-Time Currency | New Roadmap Released - page 129. (Read 1356140 times)

BUMP

Yea man come over to the new forums we all talk there now. Make a few friends

Very nice to see that Vericoin is still strong and doing well. Keep up the good work!

damn, seems to be u're foking right man: one hour ago some1 sold almost half million of VRC on bittrex

truly insightful

Of course we are saying the devs are incapable of getting the coding done. The devs haven't been delivering a thing for months, absolutely no progress, they weren't able to add any new features to the code base, therefore I am sure you would agree that the LTC/Sunny King code cloner developers failed with this project. Now the devs switched to a new lame idea, the cloud storage implementation for SuperNet. That's even exceeds the irrationality of the VISA card idea, which is quite extraordinary as we thought the VISA card fuck-up was the lamest idea ever. Integrate cloud storage into the blockchain is as much rational as integrate guano (excrement of seabirds) into the blockchain, it is not a viable use case.

As for the cheerleader hurrah about the 100 BTC buy wall at fucking 9K, since majority of the bagholders bought into the coin between 20k-50k, that buy wall means absolutely nothing. Put the buy wall to a reasonable price and you will see plenty of actions within seconds.

 

i doubt there will be any. all these people fudding have an agenda and i can promise you guys its not an altruistic one.

keep checking background information and your due dillegence - some people are here just for the money and dont flinch from manipulating and scamming to get it.

some are more literate, smart and eloquent then others and sometimes it is hard to distinguish between truth and lie, but never lose your due dilligence!

crypto is here to stay and i believe vrc has a great position when crypto will archieve mainstream adoption.

funny... wall has been up for 12 hours and no one is selling

We've been reading about your "group" of investors and the pending SuperDump that's going to wipe out VRC for months. It's like the boy who cried wolf... Any effect that the first cry may have had has been drastically reduced by all of the cries that followed.

'Sorry that you guys want to get out, but shit happens ::shrug::. Now is the ideal time for you to get out and minimize any further loses - there's 100 BTC of buy walls for you guys to dump into:



Best of luck to you guys in whatever you plan to do with the BTC you collect from your dump.

what are you expecting from us?? something more tantamount to this... ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKvvOFIHs4k

pump pump pump

some things just take time. unless you're saying you think the devs are incapable of getting the coding done. been with vrc since the beginning as a miner and these guys know how to deliver. just they may not deliver on the day that you want to make money but then again.. what day dont you want to make money?

this road map looks the same for almost 3 months, beside the new wallet got finished.

looks good. the market looks good too returning to an organic growth pattern i believe.

Hey kleineaap ! From your rants on twitter i didn't know you can articulate so well So why the sudden post ? I read it but not really understanding where you stand really... either way glad to hear from you.

Highjacking this post.

I'm still not sure why you'd find public developers - of a project that you invested in - a greater deal.
Is it possible that you just suck at investing? If, in your eyes, it's rare to find the real people behind the projects you back. And please note, when I say 'you', I'm not referring to OP specifically. I prefer if you all take this as a general notice.
I don't feel like judging your ways, but please don't try to hit the blindman countless times with the same invalid reasoning. Being a public profile adds nothing. Having it in the alternative cryptocurrency jungle might be satisfying due to its lack, but by no means translates immediately to transparency and competence like you are intending to make believe.

Having said that, I don't doubt that VRC devs set a few unique precedents. You should focus more on that imo. Their vision was ambitious, yet palpable. They've actually achieved to implement unique tools to their ideals. VeriBit for example, being centralized or not, was a successfully implemented changing feature. It covered a whole series of issues related to acceptance, and it was presented in a simple but effective way. Other features like SMS were less effective, and less impressive to the eye, yet they went all in the great purpose to bring crypto to the masses easily. This must be noted.

VRC had a quite royal run, because it caught most of the community on an early phase, generating its initial attracting volume, and getting backed later by a few more of those who saw an opportunity.
The hype after a few weeks, at the current price range actually, was insane. #VRC was second to Bitcoin in Twitter references regarding crypto currency. And all that jazz eventually came up to tell you: "hey, they're public, you can't get hurt."
But you did. It's my honest belief that that pump needed an end to satisfy some parts, and even though I'm not sure if its end was premeditated, I'm certainly suspicious on certain actions taken at the time.
Nothing can consistently go up in value without getting a few chops. And VRC seemed undefeatable. The interest was so huge that some even put their life savings into it. And they got burned.

Now the important part of it, if we fast forward it till now: VeriCoin stands solid on its real market price. For what it is, let's say it. You can trade it now ~40k less of its ATH. Some might think it's a disaster, others an opportunity.
Then comes the need to reinvent from the bagholder, so there's a Supernet all of a sudden (because community paid for it in the sake of "we must do something") and the once before active devs - slowly get 'sold' to take a route they never before idealized. For market's sake.
If it wouldn't be for the pressure - and to this point I stand corrected and apologize for my poisonous VRC rants on Twitter that I never cared to explain in detail*; I'd be happy to envision a VeriCoin loyal to its initial principles, with hard hand good communicating devs, and real palpable routes like were drawn before.

Point is, before I wander off even more, worry not to bring VRC out of its own devs, by Supernetting the shit out of it. This was a silly idea. Instead, convince this team to question their way and their will.
If principles are still intact, I don't see a reason not to hard implement them. We know that funds are easily raised. And even the dev needs a bit of motivation from its peers. Catch him before he moves off to another project, where your money is not at... yet.


Disclaimer:
*I am kleineaap, @1kleine twitter handle. Long term supporter of VRC since I discovered it at 800sat. I used my early BTC funds to support the market buys and accumulated enough all the way to 1.5 million VRC.
The night I finished dumping half a million coins I made my holdings public for the first time. 3 hours later there was the "Mintpal hack" which ended up hurting me a lot.
The hack was never explained. One of the devs actually told me that "we never had any proof evidence of an actual hack taking place". I've called out the other devs, and I was in search for a decent clarification "that protects the investors" which never came.
So I've moved on, and despite not suffering direct losses, I somewhat felt that I was prevented to dump. So I said fuck you, and I managed to sell another 500k off market during the sell off.
Still holding a third of it. What happened? I can speculate, but honestly I don't know for sure.

But at least Alex/Ryan is public now and we don't have Mintpal anymore.

Wow am I glad I bought 50% more last night 

dat wall

Devs aren't here anymore...check out the new forums, lots being done and worked on

https://www.vericoinforums.com/

Almost at 100+ posts daily

That all you got...