We discussed that for long already. You remember when I started to talk in this thread about Ethereum, Gavin Wood's white paper, blockchain 2, Counterparty, etc. and you joined the conversation and subscribed to the idea. Since the devs are not interested and they have no skills to implement any blockchain 2 features no point to discuss that further.
I guess you don't even know how capable our dev. are
You would be surprised I guess. But Programming takes a lot of time. Just take look at DRK and how long it took them to develop just one thing. Darksend+ took over 6 months and still not completed. While Blockchain 2 is another caliber. I guess you know how many well skilled people work full time on Ethereum while we just have 3 devs with family and dayjobs working on this coin.You can't expect anything groundbreaking and outstanding by them in a short time. Development is time consuming especially when you code new things.
But I have to say our developer are really skilled and doing very well at what they are doing.
All right Galix, you are 23 years old and your enthusiasm and interest in software development is great, but I have been coding software, working with developers and investing in software companies for over 25 years. So lets not discuss what software development requires terms of resources. No disrespect but you don't know that.
You have no idea about Ethereum. The core component, the cpp-ethereum is virtually written by one guy. I actually know Gavin Wood and yes he is quite exceptional developer/scientist, but still the 40 people of the ethereum team has nothing to do with the core component. Similarly, only Peter Todd and btcdrak work on the viacoin ClearingHouse, terms of team size less then the 3 VRC devs.
If the VRC devs would have the adequate skill set and they would start coding then it would be possible to compete. They just don't do the work.
