What you and many others fail to understand, (or more believably use as excuse to FUD) is the fact that not rolling back would exactly lead to the situation in where protocol would be exploited.
Therefore same situation.
Eth.
What you obviously don't understand:
Did VRC fix the protocol? No... VRC is still vulnerable to exactly the same majority holder attack.
This is why Proof of Share coins are inherently inferior.
VRC cannot fix the flaw, because it's built into the protocol. The coin is permanently flawed.
This is a wrong conclusion, in my opinion. The problem is not POS protocol. The problem is the scale. A SMALL POS is a problem. A big one is the solution.
Correct, nowhere, seriously NO WHERE, in any technical literature about POS does it say, "OK, now, a really big and greedy exchange should keep lots and lots of these coins in a hot wallet and have an SQL injection vulnerability coded into their site"
Nowhere does it say that, and remember too, Mintpal never really said how the SQL injection happened, if they even know, if that isn't' complete bullshit anyway.
POS is not the problem, centralized exchanges that lie are the problem. Right on mintpal's site it states "the majority of funds are kept in cold storage" but clearly that is a lie. They keep shitcoins like GRUMP in cold storage I'm sure, but amazingly this really valuable coin, veri, was in the hot wallet, all 8 million. Look at the network stake numbers from just before that day to just after, it was clearly MP staking all 8 million coins, so they lied in their announcement about the hack.
Buy vericoin, dump mintpal.