The devs chose to act as a central banker would.
ANTI-CRYPTO is what Vericoin is.
Vericoin is the Paypal of Crypto.
Vericoin devs = Ben Bernanke!
FIAT monetary systems cannot be directly compared to crypto. They have similarities, but are still two different worlds. More importantly the devs were forced into a corner. The only other option was to leave the chain as is and allow one individual to have 8M coins. If that person were to stake 8M coins, they would then control the chain and can double-spend (51% attack). VRC would be dead.
I don't think you're considering the entire situation.
Yes they can both be compared to each other.
When a Crypto coin like Vericoin decides (through its developers) to roll back the block chain because an incompetent exchange (Mintpal) fucked up on its security procedures you can find similarities in the two.
The Federal Reserve bailed out Big banks that made bad decisions in 2008.
Mintpal made a bad decision to keep MOST of its users' VRC holding in their hot wallet. The VRC devs bailed out Mintpail.
The principal is the same.
VRC users may as well use the legacy banking system or PayPal. There is no difference in principal.
A bailout creates money out of thin air, which is the problem. A roll back is not creating money out of thin air. Think a little harder
lol really?
Rollback basically puts back the virtual money out of thin air back where it was at a particular point in time.
It moves the money. The federal reserve system can do the same thing. Delete or freeze a hackers bank account of money they stole and recredit the victims account.
Think a little harder buddy.