seriously read through bitcointalk.org there's 1000s of scam threads in which you have people proclaiming trust in the devs.
You're not supposed to have to trust the devs.
I don't believe education is your reason for posting at all. See my join date, I've read through many scams and been through many different coins. Hell, I did own "SolidCoin" which I believe was the second alt coin after Litecoin, or one of the earliest, which I never paid for any SolidCoin, always got it for free. I believe that was a scam in the end, but it was a matter of picking and choosing battles and seeing where things go.
I am not saying your way of thinking is wrong for yourself, just your way of thinking does not have to be right for every person or every coin. Believe me when I say I prefer open source as a general rule, it just makes sense imo, and I hope some features of Vericoin are able to change protocol to be open source. For now though, the transparency and interaction from the developers is enough for me to see where this coin is going.
People in this thread and all the other Vericoin communities (Vericoin reddit, Twitter, Veritalk forums) are very aware they are putting a lot of trust in the developers and that many of the key features that separate Vericoin from other coins rely on these devs. You're not supposed to have to trust the devs, but people can if they want and there is no need to be negative about people having choice :/ (btw, I mean that from the Vericoin users that attack back as well, bullshit posts can stop and be discussed better from haters and lovers of the coin)