Once the issue gets resolved and the devs and community come back to the thread, its going to be a fucking circus with all the fudders. See you later VRC thread, prob will be locked.
This ^ is what I see given what happened today with the rollback.
No rules just roll it back.
Future implications of roll backs need to be addressed. They devs said they will never do it again. I doubt that.
What if 30% gets stolen again?
What % is the cut off to be considered "roll-back" material? 10%? 20%?
maybe then developer will go true way of development POS.
Anyway solutions to 30% staking should be implemented already, if VRC is PPC>NOVA>BC fork
and whole situation of 30% coins is just smoke screen of saving Mintpal exchange.
Here source of info.
Issues/controversies (
http://coinwiki.info/en/Novacoin )
Stake generation issuesThe main proof-of-stake design problem is that unlike proof-of-work hashing rate, stake weight could be used multiple times without any overhead. It allows potential attacker to repeat his attempts to generate consecutive stakes until he will get lucky enough.
And there is high probability to success without holding large stake, 20–25% of total weight (not coins) will be more than enough. Attacker can retry his attempts to generate consecutive stakes 1,000, 50,000, or 1 million times without any problem, using the same outputs.[12][13]
This could be worked around using centralized check-pointing. Novacoin creators resolved this issue using balanced weighting scheme.[14]
Centralized check pointing_______
(BC POS 2.0 make more to repel those kind of attacks too... )