[ANN][X11/X13] X11 (Darkcoin)/X13 (Marucoin) miner (based on sph-sgminer) - page 39.

Starscream

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

Quote from: mapleshadow on June 02, 2014, 06:10:11 AM

amd 14.6 bate drive, a large number of hw error

14.6 has been problematic for a lot of people.
Use 14.4, 14.3 or 13.12

restless

legendary

Activity: 1151

Merit: 1001

Quote from: bullus on June 02, 2014, 04:09:06 AM

Any news from x13 and hd5xxx,hd6xxx?

Several pages behind I had posted link to last "x13mod" which works for me on older cards
~ 790KH/s on stock 5850
~ 1.2GH on 6970 running at 900/1200
sgminer -k x13mod -o stratum+tcp://digit.suprnova.cc:3447 -u USER.U -p U -w 256 -g 1 -I 18 --thread-concurrency 7200

decreasing -w lowers hashrate, increase -I until the card is stable

mapleshadow

member

Activity: 79

Merit: 10

amd 14.6 bate drive, a large number of hw error

topnetdeal

member

Activity: 61

Merit: 10

Quote from: Mister1k on June 02, 2014, 04:35:40 AM

X11 hd 7950 x3. Ive been playing with xintensity.
I am also using cgwatcher. That way you can see shares per second against the work utility.
For me. 1792 shaders * X= 1792x120=215,040 threads.
I incrementally go up and watch shares and WU.
My hash changes 10-30khs but is deceiving. Hash goes down a bit but shares rise.
Cgwatcher you can see shares in real time.
I am running 2 threads per gpu. Work 256.
X=120 so that is X60 per thread.
1100 on the clocks 1500 memory.
3x hd7950 = 8.9 mh/s
2.96 mh per card .
My pool sees 9.25-10 mh/s
WU is .120+
.040 per card
According to this chart.
I:13 = 8192 threads
I:14 = 16384 threads
I:15 = 32768 threads
I:16 = 65536 threads
I:17 = 131072 threads
I:18 = 262144 threads
I:19 = 524288 threads
I:20 = 1048576 threads

1792x120=215040 or about I 17.75ish.
Will test more. Have a great day.

Hi, xintensity is max 9999, I think You was working with rawintensity (max 2147483647).

Bojcha

hero member

Activity: 848

Merit: 500

where did you find that 120 and 60 number?
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #nqWzb4qug4G9ATyT

Mister1k

hero member

Activity: 896

Merit: 520

X11 hd 7950 x3. Ive been playing with xintensity.
I am also using cgwatcher. That way you can see shares per second against the work utility.
For me. 1792 shaders * X= 1792x120=215,040 threads.
I incrementally go up and watch shares and WU.
My hash changes 10-30khs but is deceiving. Hash goes down a bit but shares rise.
Cgwatcher you can see shares in real time.
I am running 2 threads per gpu. Work 256.
X=120 so that is X60 per thread.
1100 on the clocks 1500 memory.
3x hd7950 = 8.9 mh/s
2.96 mh per card .
My pool sees 9.25-10 mh/s
WU is .120+
.040 per card
According to this chart.
I:13 = 8192 threads
I:14 = 16384 threads
I:15 = 32768 threads
I:16 = 65536 threads
I:17 = 131072 threads
I:18 = 262144 threads
I:19 = 524288 threads
I:20 = 1048576 threads

1792x120=215040 or about I 17.75ish.
Will test more. Have a great day.

boubou

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

I can't make it run on PIMP

I have an error: 100% rejected and HW with message "low difficulty share" .
I assume it's because it does not find the right kernel even if I put
"kernel" : "x11mod",

bullus

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

Any news from x13 and hd5xxx,hd6xxx?

restless

legendary

Activity: 1151

Merit: 1001

Quote from: sikboy on June 02, 2014, 02:36:04 AM

Quote from: restless on June 02, 2014, 02:26:58 AM

Quote from: sikboy on June 02, 2014, 02:03:13 AM

Am i right in assuming that mining x13 will be slower per MH than X11?

yes

is work being made to increase the speed of X13?

13>11 don't you think ?!
X11 improvements were already implemented into X13

sikboy

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: restless on June 02, 2014, 02:26:58 AM

Quote from: sikboy on June 02, 2014, 02:03:13 AM

Am i right in assuming that mining x13 will be slower per MH than X11?

yes

is work being made to increase the speed of X13?

restless

legendary

Activity: 1151

Merit: 1001

Quote from: sikboy on June 02, 2014, 02:03:13 AM

Am i right in assuming that mining x13 will be slower per MH than X11?

yes

sikboy

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Am i right in assuming that mining x13 will be slower per MH than X11?

I tried it last night, same settings by just changing x11mod to x13mod and mining
BoostCoin (BOST) and got the same speed as i would mining with the standard sgminer?

minerjoen

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 500

Quote from: miner555 on June 01, 2014, 09:18:15 PM

dont work. pls help

[05:14:49] sgminer.exe: --kernel: Invalid parameter to set_kernel

C:\Users\Yavuz\Desktop\X13mod\sgminer.exe --kernel x13mod -o stratum

C:\Users\Yavuz\Desktop\X13mod\sgminer.exe -k x13mod -o stratum

i dont use x13mod pls help

here my example from x11mod on my evga 580gtx
sgminer.exe -k x11mod -o stratum

i got just the x11mod folder, i dont use that c:/ blablabla. just sgminer.exe thats it. Because i use an .bat file with the info i need, i dont start everything step by step in the CMD..
My speed on the nvidia card get from 370Khs to 2.4Mhs. I hope the x13mod will also work soon for nvidia Cheesy

because now i only get high speeds, but almost none accepted shares.

hero18688

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

Someone give me a conf for 290 tri-x for x13mod.I can only get 2.56m.But my 280x gets 2.65m.
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #Ne2usjAnL8h1fHnT

-Blueraiven-

newbie

Activity: 57

Merit: 0

Anyone can share their hashrates for 270X?

I'm using Sapphire 270X Vapor-X & having hashrates of:

X11 = 2.2 MH/s
X13 = 1.75 MH/s

Wanna try to push it through anyone getting higher hashrates than this?

ebliever

legendary

Activity: 1708

Merit: 1036

Quote from: jimlite on June 01, 2014, 09:14:49 PM

Is there a reason why this doesn't work with Nicehash X11 -p p=1.0 ?
Also do 2nd pools or failovers work?

I've mined at Nicehash on X11 with this miner. When did you try it? I haven't seen X11 with rates over 1.0 in about 2 days, so that might be your problem. The current best rate is 0.50 so you would need to set p=0.5 or lower.

miner555

member

Activity: 80

Merit: 10

dont work. pls help

[05:14:49] sgminer.exe: --kernel: Invalid parameter to set_kernel

C:\Users\Yavuz\Desktop\X13mod\sgminer.exe --kernel x13mod -o stratum

C:\Users\Yavuz\Desktop\X13mod\sgminer.exe -k x13mod -o stratum

i dont use x13mod pls help

jimlite

legendary

Activity: 1848

Merit: 1018

Is there a reason why this doesn't work with Nicehash X11 -p p=1.0 ?
Also do 2nd pools or failovers work?

Wolf_Pack

sr. member

Activity: 386

Merit: 250

Quote from: hashbrown9000 on June 01, 2014, 08:53:33 PM

@Wolf, what are your stales and rejects with those settings on your 270 cards?

Rejects are about .6% I'm not sure about stales. I actually switched back to multipool about 2 hours ago because nanolite's difficulty shot through the roof.

hashbrown9000

sr. member

Activity: 427

Merit: 250

@Wolf, what are your stales and rejects with those settings on your 270 cards?

Topic: [ANN][X11/X13] X11 (Darkcoin)/X13 (Marucoin) miner (based on sph-sgminer) - page 39. (Read 351555 times)