Topic: [ANN][XCP] Counterparty - Pioneering Peer-to-Peer Finance - Official Thread - page 216. (Read 1276789 times)
August 09, 2014, 08:02:04 PM
Awesome. Good luck!
August 09, 2014, 07:49:42 PM
Hi Devs and Community,
Good job with the new Counterwallet fixes! I like the addition of "Escr:" next to balances in orders. It also seems like trades are happening more smoothly.
The time seems right so I just wanted to pre-emptively let you guys know that I am about to flood the exchange with 32 different assets, all of which correspond to different NFL football teams' odds of winning the Super Bowl.
Its kind of a complicated "game" but if you're interested in knowing more about what these tokens are, please visit the BitBowl blog page. Thanks and just so you know I will not be using this thread for advertisement purposes in the future.
Good job with the new Counterwallet fixes! I like the addition of "Escr:" next to balances in orders. It also seems like trades are happening more smoothly.
The time seems right so I just wanted to pre-emptively let you guys know that I am about to flood the exchange with 32 different assets, all of which correspond to different NFL football teams' odds of winning the Super Bowl.
Its kind of a complicated "game" but if you're interested in knowing more about what these tokens are, please visit the BitBowl blog page. Thanks and just so you know I will not be using this thread for advertisement purposes in the future.
August 09, 2014, 07:40:42 PM
I try log in with crhome and get message, last days my counterwallet have been logged in and now i try log out and in when get this. Only warning what no need care i dont have try my acc with any other device or browser?
"Confirm connection You appear to be logged into Counterwallet elsewhere. It's not safe to be logged into the same wallet account from multiple devices at the same time. If you are sure that this is not the case, press Continue. Otherwise, please press Cancel, logout from your other device, and try again."
"Confirm connection You appear to be logged into Counterwallet elsewhere. It's not safe to be logged into the same wallet account from multiple devices at the same time. If you are sure that this is not the case, press Continue. Otherwise, please press Cancel, logout from your other device, and try again."
Try clearing your cache/cookies. I had that once as well. Now I run it in an incognito window and haven't seen that happen again.
August 09, 2014, 05:46:46 PM
I try log in with crhome and get message, last days my counterwallet have been logged in and now i try log out and in when get this. Only warning what no need care i dont have try my acc with any other device or browser?
"Confirm connection You appear to be logged into Counterwallet elsewhere. It's not safe to be logged into the same wallet account from multiple devices at the same time. If you are sure that this is not the case, press Continue. Otherwise, please press Cancel, logout from your other device, and try again."
"Confirm connection You appear to be logged into Counterwallet elsewhere. It's not safe to be logged into the same wallet account from multiple devices at the same time. If you are sure that this is not the case, press Continue. Otherwise, please press Cancel, logout from your other device, and try again."
August 09, 2014, 01:32:04 PM
I am probably asking a stupid question here, but is there a way to make the matching happens on a central server outside the protocol and still use Counterparty to make the settlement?
It's definitely possible, but not currently supported. Such a system also wouldn't have many advantages over the current one.
I see how counterparty could disrupt the custodian and clearing houses business but I really don't see how it can compete with centralized exchanges.
It could, yes. The order matching would be faster. The settlement would still take the same amount of time.
But pairing the trade and the settlement makes the trading painful. I don't think this model is viable in the long term. (If historically they have been unpaired it's for a good reason.)
How do you mean it makes it painful? Are you talking about the lag when trading with BTC? Otherwise I think 10 minutes or whatever the block happens to be is not too long a period to wait. Or am I misunderstanding what you mean?
http://support.counterparty.co/support/solutions/articles/5000003456-how-would-counterparty-support-faster-trading-than-bitcoin
But yes, it is possible to support such fast trades, but it would require centralization (or at least some form of it) for trading, and then settlement to the blockchain, as Adam noted.
I hope some exchange will think about Counterparty assets and give them a try. Then the market could decide what's the most useful way to use that technology.
August 09, 2014, 06:58:04 AM
I am probably asking a stupid question here, but is there a way to make the matching happens on a central server outside the protocol and still use Counterparty to make the settlement?
It's definitely possible, but not currently supported. Such a system also wouldn't have many advantages over the current one.
I see how counterparty could disrupt the custodian and clearing houses business but I really don't see how it can compete with centralized exchanges.
It could, yes. The order matching would be faster. The settlement would still take the same amount of time.
But pairing the trade and the settlement makes the trading painful. I don't think this model is viable in the long term. (If historically they have been unpaired it's for a good reason.)
How do you mean it makes it painful? Are you talking about the lag when trading with BTC? Otherwise I think 10 minutes or whatever the block happens to be is not too long a period to wait. Or am I misunderstanding what you mean?
http://support.counterparty.co/support/solutions/articles/5000003456-how-would-counterparty-support-faster-trading-than-bitcoin
But yes, it is possible to support such fast trades, but it would require centralization (or at least some form of it) for trading, and then settlement to the blockchain, as Adam noted.
August 09, 2014, 04:07:41 AM
I am probably asking a stupid question here, but is there a way to make the matching happens on a central server outside the protocol and still use Counterparty to make the settlement?
It's definitely possible, but not currently supported. Such a system also wouldn't have many advantages over the current one.
I see how counterparty could disrupt the custodian and clearing houses business but I really don't see how it can compete with centralized exchanges.
It could, yes. The order matching would be faster. The settlement would still take the same amount of time.
But pairing the trade and the settlement makes the trading painful. I don't think this model is viable in the long term. (If historically they have been unpaired it's for a good reason.)
How do you mean it makes it painful? Are you talking about the lag when trading with BTC? Otherwise I think 10 minutes or whatever the block happens to be is not too long a period to wait. Or am I misunderstanding what you mean?
August 08, 2014, 01:11:48 PM
I am probably asking a stupid question here, but is there a way to make the matching happens on a central server outside the protocol and still use Counterparty to make the settlement?
It's definitely possible, but not currently supported. Such a system also wouldn't have many advantages over the current one.
I see how counterparty could disrupt the custodian and clearing houses business but I really don't see how it can compete with centralized exchanges.
It could, yes. The order matching would be faster. The settlement would still take the same amount of time.
But pairing the trade and the settlement makes the trading painful. I don't think this model is viable in the long term. (If historically they have been unpaired it's for a good reason.)
Yes, but in traditional financial markets, you're legally obligated to settle. Here, you don't have to settle if you don't want to, if the funds in question are not already held in escrow. For a middleman-less escrow system, the matching has to be done in the same layer.
August 08, 2014, 12:43:56 PM
I am probably asking a stupid question here, but is there a way to make the matching happens on a central server outside the protocol and still use Counterparty to make the settlement?
It's definitely possible, but not currently supported. Such a system also wouldn't have many advantages over the current one.
I see how counterparty could disrupt the custodian and clearing houses business but I really don't see how it can compete with centralized exchanges.
It could, yes. The order matching would be faster. The settlement would still take the same amount of time.
But pairing the trade and the settlement makes the trading painful. I don't think this model is viable in the long term. (If historically they have been unpaired it's for a good reason.)
August 08, 2014, 12:08:10 PM
I am probably asking a stupid question here, but is there a way to make the matching happens on a central server outside the protocol and still use Counterparty to make the settlement?
It's definitely possible, but not currently supported. Such a system also wouldn't have many advantages over the current one.
I see how counterparty could disrupt the custodian and clearing houses business but I really don't see how it can compete with centralized exchanges.
It could, yes. The order matching would be faster. The settlement would still take the same amount of time.
August 08, 2014, 11:59:40 AM
I am probably asking a stupid question here, but is there a way to make the matching happens on a central server outside the protocol and still use Counterparty to make the settlement?
It's definitely possible, but not currently supported. Such a system also wouldn't have many advantages over the current one.
I see how counterparty could disrupt the custodian and clearing houses business but I really don't see how it can compete with centralized exchanges.
August 08, 2014, 10:22:35 AM
I am probably asking a stupid question here, but is there a way to make the matching happens on a central server outside the protocol and still use Counterparty to make the settlement?
It's definitely possible, but not currently supported. Such a system also wouldn't have many advantages over the current one.
August 08, 2014, 09:06:31 AM
I am probably asking a stupid question here, but is there a way to make the matching happens on a central server outside the protocol and still use Counterparty to make the settlement?
August 08, 2014, 05:42:45 AM
Finally, a German news article about peer-to-peer finance (mentions Counterparty):
"Bitcoin: US-Onlinehändler Overstock erwägt Kryptoaktien"
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Bitcoin-US-Onlinehaendler-Overstock-erwaegt-Kryptoaktien-2282433.html
Translation: "US Online Retailer Overstock considers Cryptoequity (Cryptostock)"
"Bitcoin: US-Onlinehändler Overstock erwägt Kryptoaktien"
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Bitcoin-US-Onlinehaendler-Overstock-erwaegt-Kryptoaktien-2282433.html
Translation: "US Online Retailer Overstock considers Cryptoequity (Cryptostock)"
August 08, 2014, 05:28:56 AM
Thank to report Misha. I just push a fix in Github. Will be online asap.
Hi JahPowerBit, in Counterwallet balances don't seem to get updated properly:
https://forums.counterparty.co/index.php/topic,188.msg3004/topicseen.html#msg3004
Hi led_lcd,
Robby and I work on the problem. Counterblockd freezes sometime without obvious reasons. It works after a restart. I just keep searching right now where the problem comes, and keep you informed.
August 08, 2014, 01:32:53 AM
The orignial address I sent the the coins to is not shown in my account, a different address is showing.
Look up what "deterministic wallet" means.
You used a wrong pass phrase.
August 07, 2014, 10:34:09 PM
Thank to report Misha. I just push a fix in Github. Will be online asap.
Hi JahPowerBit, in Counterwallet balances don't seem to get updated properly:
https://forums.counterparty.co/index.php/topic,188.msg3004/topicseen.html#msg3004
August 07, 2014, 05:16:22 AM
Really ?
Thank to report Misha. I just push a fix in Github. Will be online asap.
August 07, 2014, 04:02:35 AM
Really ?
August 06, 2014, 10:43:39 AM
For me chrome show right.
Jump to: