On the contrary, I congratulate Golem, but personally I cannot understand the discrepancy between the disinterest in Elastic compared to the hype we saw in the Golem crowdsale, especially after comparing the technologies with each other.
Golem basically uses the abilities of the Ethereum-platform as some kind PR platform. On every meeting or congress for ETH the last 6 months Golem was also mentioned. Additionally to that their approach is different from us, they founded a company with early investors and stuff like that, eventually even getting some advice through consulting firms and what not. Its a different approach, but its not hurting us imo. They are raising awareness of the challenge both projects are trying to tackle. Its more or less win-win imo.
Yeah, I think is fine for all of us, Still, I feel we (the people?) should not mix up things here. Golem, from what I understand, is just a market for idle computation power which rents out virtual machines to other people in a P2P manner. Great stuff, however, Elastic tries to be one panmictic supercomputer with bazillion cores. Anyway, you are right: totally different techs.
On the second point (but I think I am pretty radical about that): I always felt as the construct "company" is more of a contraindication than it is of advantage. Companies work slow, have a lot of management overhead, they work 9-to-5 instead of with true passion. All the great tech so far came out of cellars, garages, or anonymous geniouses who spend months of coding totally forgetting about showering because they are so thrilled about what they are doing. But that is just my point of view ;-) Others just need the "anticipated security" of a "company", which is fine!
I have to say: keep on the good steady work guys!! this is truly an inspiring endeavor!
Oh, and please don't forget to shower when needed despite the hard work ;-)
I don't understand how he finds time to jump over the Grand Canyon and stuff, with all the hard work he is putting into this…
Seriously though, I think there is no way around some kind of PR campaign. Those who feel unable to contribute to Elastics tech directly, we could really, really need your help in another regard: here are some questions that you guys may search the answers for:
- Who will be our main target audience(/audiences)? Who would want to use Elastic the most?
- What are their usual means of online communication? What social media do they use, who do they follow on twitter, what forums do they post in, what blogs do they read?
- How can we reach them?
- What ways of PR do you think would work best for the Elastic project? Banners? Blog posts? Hackathons?
- Are there respected members of this group, that we could reach out to, to get them interested and use them as multipliers?
I can't shed the feeling, that Elastics success hinges on a strong community (or the lack thereof). Tech is one thing. You need a working product. You can't expect too much applause for it, that is sad, but it is the way it is. What Elastic needs is multipliers, people in key positions, who tell other people about this project.
Now, let's talk money: if you guys are interested in your investment actually multiplying in value, you need to contribute. Don't look at me, my investment in this project is so small, it's not really worth it. I can't speak for E-K, coralreefer and so on, but they owe you exactly nothing.
TL;DR: just because you are not tech-savvy, doesn't mean you guys can't contribute to the Elastic Project. And if you want your investment to multiply in value, you should do your part. The alternative would be blaming the people who worked their asses off for not working their asses off hard enough.