I think nobody here wants any marketing or PR.
This is what I sharply criticize with all these other successful (at least on the surface) coins that are being built at the moment.
Most of them have a wonderful PR, they use dozens of buzz words (internet of things, DAPPs, blah, ...) and they attract many people who are entirely blended. They do everything to lure the last penny out of their users' pockets. Signature campaigns, twitter broadcasts, glossy articles with even glossier faces of the (of course) non-anonymous dev team creating the illusion of "security" ... all this has precedence over the technology itself. No wonder, mostly the tech is just a reinvented wheel (for the 4th or 5th time) ... but the loyal user will ignore that and (thanks to the, I have to admit, very good PR campaigns) jump on the hype train.
I am so happy, that Elastic Project is not this kind of "project".
Here, nobody tries to forcibly convince anyone that this project is the best out there, nobody is wasting time on signature campaigns, nobody needs facebook sockpuppets or any other kind of PR ... I think that anyone who is involved here understands the algorithmic difficulties that this coin is trying to solve and is happy to work on an interesting and challenging piece of open source software.
Unfortunately, in the over-hyped crypto land as we experience it today, not many people are expected to donate towards Elastic Project but if the price otherwise would be to send the science to the background in favor of boring marketing and hype (like in, spending 90% time on the marketing and 10% on the development) then it's just the way it is.
By the way: I have worked for many large projects already. Those who required a project proposal full of buzz words (and no technical profoundness at all) to convince people with little to no knowledge to financially back the project were those with the least charme.