I have a suggestion because this project actually, for my opinion premature but can't do nothing about it, entered "financial" stage...
When Lite wallet will come out and XEL will actually has some real life value, 10% of each donor account XEL will be taken to:
5% will be shared by 3 main developers (let's call them "CORE" or whatever) as there are who actually gave this project some kind of life and this will be small token of "community" appreciation .
CORE with community will find and vote on PR and strategy guys ( maybe more positions) because it will be needed for sure in the future ( CORE will have 30% of voting power on this subject, XEL holders 70% )
This 5 guys (or 7 or 9), unless someone will choose not to of course, will have 40% on any future vote based on majority of inner core votes (60% still will be community's) . They are also will be in charge of additional 5% (out of 10% donated) that will be reserved for immediate/future expanses as hiring more developers, PR project etc.
I saw many people, that the only thing preventing them from donating to project is lack of wallet so I think all will be glad donating to project and help it's "heroes" (Sorry, although I have great respect to every person that working on this project, I think that person need to do something else to be a "hero", no offending
)
So we can make a "democratic" vote about this.
I believe this will actually help project much more than many nice words.
I am very interested to hear fail points of this suggestion or different numbers.
[edit] @coralreefer, @unvoid , @Evil-Knievel : I know that this suggestion puts you in kind of conflict of interests, but I will be glad if you will refer at least to part of it that you find appropriate.
this has been discussed and dismissed several times. Go read back in this thread a few pages, you'll find the same suggestion over and over.
A TL;DR of why it has been dismissed every time:
Everyone is free to donate a part of their share to a donation fund, be it 5%, 10% or whatever. Forcing users to "donate" a fixed percentage by a "democratic" vote would be unethical and legally highly questionable, since you'd take something from users which is rightfully theirs.
Just because a majority (which in case of elasticracy is more of an oligarchy anyway, not a democracy) said so, doesn't make it ok. This is why this is one of those instances, in which voting is not an option.
Apart from all that, there is no central foundation in place and thus, no place to hold the donated XEL. Where would you put it? Who should be responsible for holding the private keys and their distribution?
Don't even dare to mention EK, he has enough on his shoulders already.
Speaking of foundation:
You realize, that everyone is free to found a foundation for Elastic, right? Everyone could go ahead and say "I'll do a crowdfunding to fund an Elastic foundation". With all this talk of Elastic needing a foundation, someone just might go ahead and do it. (Don't look at me. I have zero experience in that regard.)
Thank you for your answer
I would not raise this unless there was voting about Lite client and this is why:
Once you start to make "community" decisions about such subjects that has big impact on project as Lite wallet voting , ethically you lost your " moral high ground" as you already forced part of donors to do something they don't agree to but it will have serious impact on them also therefore any vote now is relevant from this point of view.
Legally, there is no problem whatsoever, because Lenisstar make it very clear that all funds are donations and that donors, for better or worst, don't have any legal rights. Tomorrow someone can take all XEL, and legally, there is no problem with it at all.
This is my personal problem, but from my experience with voluntary donations... it's "not working so good", If it was working there was already army of developers helping our overloaded developers.
"Just because a majority (which in case of elasticracy is more of an oligarchy anyway, not a democracy) said so, doesn't make it ok" - can't agree with you more, it's even not oligarchy, but "active" oligarchy... But still, same point, once voting about crucial issues started which have immidiate impact on others, you can't say this is OK and this is not just because it sounds different.
"Don't even dare to mention EK, he has enough on his shoulders already." Also more than agree with idea, less with tone but I think EK and others are big boys and can choose whatever they want. I, you or somebody else can't force them of course but the choice has to be presented.
"You realize, that everyone is free to found a foundation for Elastic, right" - and again more than agree with you! but in order to prevent future problems like it already was were someone "and his friend" founded an Elastic foundation and demanded all code/keys etc.
it will be better that there will be some regulation body, before (and there are already enough) Elastic will "explode" and many people with agenda will try to hijack this project in it's "baby" phase.
You see, basically we agree almost on everything
P.S. don't look at me also