Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][XRB]Cryptocurrency's killer app: RaiBlocks micropayments - page 54. (Read 775172 times)

sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 254
Nano has its own importance but there is reasonable philosophy behind the fees concept.Nano,will be indispensable with its robust infrastructure.

In addition Nano will be indispensable because without charge and instant transaction. Now just waiting to see how the team is marketing Nano to e-commerce, so they use Nano as a payment option

Yeah that's a huge advantage that Nano has towards the other crypto that's currently in the coinmarketcap's top 20, just based on what I've seen so far, this is the only project that really delivers on the instant and no transaction fees promise. There's no other coin that is in the market right now that's as fast as Nano when it comes to transactions and no other coin out there that offers feeless transactions so I really think that these features will help Nano dominate the market soon. I'm sure the team are really working on that, if I'm not mistaken there's a website which the team are currently working on where online shop owners could easily integrate & use nano as a mode of payment for their business.
full member
Activity: 350
Merit: 100
Nano has its own importance but there is reasonable philosophy behind the fees concept.Nano,will be indispensable with its robust infrastructure.

In addition Nano will be indispensable because without charge and instant transaction. Now just waiting to see how the team is marketing Nano to e-commerce, so they use Nano as a payment option
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 254
Still talking about this thread ))) Too much attention to the title. Moreover the team will not cover any questions here. Discord is more natural for cryptocurrencies and Nano's one is extremely active.

I agree with you, but as I know the team is also active in this thread and telegram channel to share the latest information, although not active as on the discord. I'm sure discord will be more active because people who know Nano from this thread will join in discord to get more information or discussion

Nope the team isn't that active on this thread unfortunately because if they are then they should've change the title by now right? Just based on what I've read from the people on here it seems like the devs are just active on the discord community and not on here but I don't blame them though the discord chat is more professional and it's more focused on the development of the project and not on it's value anyway I just hope one member from the team would go back and be active on here, I think it's nice if there will be one representative talking to us and answering most of our questions about Nano and it would also help if the team will finally change the title lol
jr. member
Activity: 182
Merit: 1
Nano has its own importance but there is reasonable philosophy behind the fees concept.Nano,will be indispensable with its robust infrastructure.
full member
Activity: 350
Merit: 100
Still talking about this thread ))) Too much attention to the title. Moreover the team will not cover any questions here. Discord is more natural for cryptocurrencies and Nano's one is extremely active.

I agree with you, but as I know the team is also active in this thread and telegram channel to share the latest information, although not active as on the discord. I'm sure discord will be more active because people who know Nano from this thread will join in discord to get more information or discussion
full member
Activity: 630
Merit: 110
Still talking about this thread ))) Too much attention to the title. Moreover the team will not cover any questions here. Discord is more natural for cryptocurrencies and Nano's one is extremely active.
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000

Will it change once the prefix on the addresses changes from "xrb_" to "nano_" ?


Prefix nano_ support in waletts 13+

That's news to me, I did not notice.
copper member
Activity: 1284
Merit: 261

Will it change once the prefix on the addresses changes from "xrb_" to "nano_" ?


Prefix nano_ support in waletts 13+
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000




Anybody ask colin yet if he plans on doing something about the topic thread?

Will it change once the prefix on the addresses changes from "xrb_" to "nano_" ?

He really shouldn't ignore the place that helped NANO tremendously (bitcointalk), sure there's a lot of trolling but he has proven to be a success so he should have tough skin by now to laugh it off.
copper member
Activity: 1284
Merit: 261
full member
Activity: 630
Merit: 110
The team addressed the scaling issue with their latest Medium update once we've raised this . The problem seems to be almost solved. So, one more improvement on security left and btc gets killed at last Grin Grin Good work team.
jr. member
Activity: 34
Merit: 1
In today's update, we learned that Nano has started marketing to enter the Chinese market

"Chinese Marketing Efforts Update

Max Chow, who is heading Nano’s Chinese outreach, will be launching the official WeChat and Weibo accounts this week. He will be working alongside WINpr, a Chinese marketing and public relations firm, to strategically push content out on WeChat and Weibo in order to increase Nano’s foothold in the region.

The Asian markets remain largely untapped for Nano. Introducing the population to Nano and increasing awareness through marketing is one of our top priorities. I will be keeping you all up to date with Max’s progress."
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Dear Team,

Aiodex is the trading platform for innovative ideas and solution based on blockchain. Come and show us and everyone in the crypto world know the value and strength of your community at https://aiodex.com

Plz, don't hesitate to let us know if you have any questions.

Sincerely,
Aiodex Team

Website: https://aiodex.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/aiodex_official
Telegram: https://t.me/aiodex_official
Facebook: https://fb.me/aiodexofficial
Discord: https://discord.gg/RvhvdZq
newbie
Activity: 164
Merit: 0
Sooner or later , It's Coming . maybe this year  , 2019? 2020 > who knows
sr. member
Activity: 742
Merit: 251
Developer Update: 7/23/2018
Optimizations, Mobile Developers and Chinese Marketing
https://medium.com/nanocurrency/developer-update-7-23-2018-e7941346bd0f
newbie
Activity: 164
Merit: 0
NANO Network Status Update
https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/910kyk/nano_network_status_update/
Quote
We already know the bottlenecks in Nano’s scaling and are coding the solutions.

Once we have finished the fixes and changes we are implementing, then we welcome stress tests as validation of the system

Bottlenecks are currently voting throughput, disk and database IO, primarily. We are working on enabling user-selectable database backends, which will allow for in-memory data storage, or other optimizable methods up to the user to choose. Voting throughput is to be improved by using 'vote stapling', where votes by reps are signed and distributed with blocks, such that when a node gets a new block that has already been voted on, it will no longer request voting confirmation once more from the representatives. We will be able to wrap all the votes up in a nice bundle and send new blocks with minimal vote traffic.

Additionally, Roy's lazy bootstrapping combined with Lee's top-down bootstrapping methods will enable nodes to only sync what they need to sync. So in events such as what happened today, the representatives vote on the new blocks, but not every node needs to get those blocks and store them. It’s another piece of the pruning pie. Nodes sending to burn addresses (like this time) would be effectively 'shouting into the void' as no account is looking to receive these transactions. Votes are cast and done. Nobody needs the blocks as nobody receives them. When historical nodes are ready, they can wait for the transaction storm to end and then bootstrap those accounts.

The 7k TPS number has been brought up numerous times - we reached that number months ago as a perfect conditions number, numerous changes to the protocol have been made since then and throughput has been affected. The network and protocol is not able to sustain that sort of throughput until we have completed optimizing everything. Some nodes wont keep up, others will. Once we are ready and everything is tested - then we can start publishing and marketing throughput.

If you are interested in simulating a stress test or want a network to spam, we enourage you to setup a Beta network node and play around as much as you like. The more nodes and representatives we get on the Beta network, the closer we get to simulating conditions on the Live network. More information at https://beta.nano.org

Great .
sr. member
Activity: 742
Merit: 251
NANO Network Status Update
https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/910kyk/nano_network_status_update/
Quote
We already know the bottlenecks in Nano’s scaling and are coding the solutions.

Once we have finished the fixes and changes we are implementing, then we welcome stress tests as validation of the system

Bottlenecks are currently voting throughput, disk and database IO, primarily. We are working on enabling user-selectable database backends, which will allow for in-memory data storage, or other optimizable methods up to the user to choose. Voting throughput is to be improved by using 'vote stapling', where votes by reps are signed and distributed with blocks, such that when a node gets a new block that has already been voted on, it will no longer request voting confirmation once more from the representatives. We will be able to wrap all the votes up in a nice bundle and send new blocks with minimal vote traffic.

Additionally, Roy's lazy bootstrapping combined with Lee's top-down bootstrapping methods will enable nodes to only sync what they need to sync. So in events such as what happened today, the representatives vote on the new blocks, but not every node needs to get those blocks and store them. It’s another piece of the pruning pie. Nodes sending to burn addresses (like this time) would be effectively 'shouting into the void' as no account is looking to receive these transactions. Votes are cast and done. Nobody needs the blocks as nobody receives them. When historical nodes are ready, they can wait for the transaction storm to end and then bootstrap those accounts.

The 7k TPS number has been brought up numerous times - we reached that number months ago as a perfect conditions number, numerous changes to the protocol have been made since then and throughput has been affected. The network and protocol is not able to sustain that sort of throughput until we have completed optimizing everything. Some nodes wont keep up, others will. Once we are ready and everything is tested - then we can start publishing and marketing throughput.

If you are interested in simulating a stress test or want a network to spam, we enourage you to setup a Beta network node and play around as much as you like. The more nodes and representatives we get on the Beta network, the closer we get to simulating conditions on the Live network. More information at https://beta.nano.org
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
When BTC Jump to 7k , Nano Reaches Top 10 gainers of the market



$3.01

was $2.1

Next Movement will cross $3.5 . hopefully  Cheesy

It seems that someone has bought a larger amount of NANO at Jul 18 and that push price to 3$, and daily volume was over 8 million $ at that day. Today we are back to 2.40 $ and yesterday trading volume is only 5.5 million $. Now I see Binance deposit problem (again), really is a shame that such coin have constant deposit problems and it is being advertised as instant&no fee...

Also NANO is now ranked at 43 place (coinmarketcap), to low considering that he was positioned in top 20 not so long ago.

All we need is another BTC rally (maybe again during autumn?). NANO has incredible tech and very big community and perfect distribution to make it back to rank 20 and higher Wink
Pages:
Jump to: