jr. member
Activity: 147
Merit: 2
so xsn with tech is about as successful as posw without.
posw was fueld in the end by belief in swap and xsn tech.
and now xsn has the tech, which people were hoping for when posw was around, but the price does not reflect that.
why though?
the community has been treated as annoyance mostly under skadooshs management. some did not join bc of that, others left.
the project that "always delivers on time every time" finally got it, that they were indeed not delivering on time every time, and that questions about that should not be considered fud, when proclaiming something like that. since everything turned into estimations, nobody can complain too much, and tech should be secure first and punctual second anyways
there simply was no hype around tpos - though ledger is to blame for that as well, since that would have been the most interesting security nerd implementation
some were scammed out of their coin, which got sold by the scammers, without having too much to worry about the price
some big time whale is selling, the distribution on cryptopia showed that for weeks, does not seem to care too much about the price either, probably got the coins for next to nothing when posw still was an ico
there is nothing that i would consider important news for quite some time. last time i got excited was in may when it was said, that the masternodes will need higher requirements, bc i thought that means there will be something happening soon, yeah... may...
the dex sounded like a nice idea, but it is not easy to achieve a user friendly dex, and even harder to have one with liquidity. i hope they will be able to achieve something like that somehow, probs through not being fully decentralized. i personally dont think that it will work out, just by
observing other so called dexs, but there is a a market for everything decentralized, so there is a chance of it working out. but a working dex will take its time thats for sure.
the hardware device sounds much too intrusive for me to be considered something big, and i really dont get it why a project that is not even able to market its coin properly had to go for something like that in the first year.
still dont know what to think of stakenet.io, when mnaas comes around i think i will get around to at least test it, but centralized staking from the tpos and dex coin seems wrong
and going through the anns in discord i think it gets obvious that the community isn't too big anyways, just have a look at the amount of reactions and how many people are online.
guerilla marketing as with the xsn-army seems to have ceased to exist, or it is just me not seeing anything done by the so called army,
devs, team and some believers seem to be in a bubble, in which every ann is great and brilliant and a big thing and so on, but it is painfully obvious that the outside of the bubble just doesnt consider most of the news to be something big.
all in all there just aren't too many reasons for the price to be rather low as long as there is the downwards pressure from before mentioned whale, a very small active community, and a lot of work put into sideprojects, which have not been able to create a hype.
but the coin is being developed, the git is active, eventually mnaas will make stakenet.io more profitable and therfore help fighting inflation through rsb.
ps i hope xeeda will help, but it is much too soon to be sure that they are working in a better way than ledger, i believe it is happening when it happened eg xsn gets implemented on ledger/xeeda