[ANN][YAC] YAC Simple Pool [LP] - page 5.

Neverest

newbie

Activity: 70

Merit: 0

Quote from: paul21 on May 10, 2013, 08:34:13 AM

I should have fixed the dropped connections. I hadn't whitelisted my forwarders, oops!

Yep, it's better now, thanks.
I got it running on Win7 64 and on Ubuntu (in VMware). Both take 50% cpu and connections are good on both.
Interestingly the virtual Ubuntu has double hashing speed and much higher amount of accepted shares (10-20 times more), not sure why.

paul21

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

Quote from: JahPowerBit on May 10, 2013, 08:40:23 AM

paul21, thank you for this good job.
You think you will share in github your code or keep only for you ?
we need more and more pool! thks.

I'll share it once I get home from work, it's actually a really simple change.

JahPowerBit

sr. member

Activity: 335

Merit: 255

Counterparty Developer

paul21, thank you for this good job.
You think you will share in github your code or keep only for you ?
we need more and more pool! thks.

paul21

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

I should have fixed the dropped connections. I hadn't whitelisted my forwarders, oops!

Rannasha

hero member

Activity: 728

Merit: 500

Quote from: Maniac on May 10, 2013, 08:13:36 AM

Quote from: theking on May 10, 2013, 03:17:25 AM

Its the same link as given by here

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2085725

but still be careful
also itll show up as the bitcoin miner on virustotal which I assume the original minerd also does but this may not nescessarily means its 100% safe/unsafe

run in vm/sandbox
also in linux itll give u way higher hashrate

Thank you!
This is win32 miner. Is exist 64-bit miner? Core i5 760 @ 2.80 Ghz - 46 kh/s is good speed?

It's not. You should run Ubuntu in a VM if you can (or ideally, without VM and directly), to get better speeds. I get double that hashrate on a laptop i7 of the same generation.

bengx

full member

Activity: 202

Merit: 100

Quote from: Maniac on May 10, 2013, 08:13:36 AM

Quote from: theking on May 10, 2013, 03:17:25 AM

Its the same link as given by here

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2085725

but still be careful
also itll show up as the bitcoin miner on virustotal which I assume the original minerd also does but this may not nescessarily means its 100% safe/unsafe

run in vm/sandbox
also in linux itll give u way higher hashrate

Thank you!
This is win32 miner. Is exist 64-bit miner? Core i5 760 @ 2.80 Ghz - 46 kh/s is good speed?

Yeah, I'm waiting out for the 64bit miner too. I actually get higher hash rates in a VM Ubuntu as opposed to running minerd on windows itself =\

Neverest

newbie

Activity: 70

Merit: 0

Quote from: paul21 on May 10, 2013, 08:14:52 AM

Quote from: Rannasha on May 10, 2013, 08:12:44 AM

Also getting a high reject-count (roughly 25% on both machines) coupled with periodic disconnect messages. Running on Ubuntu (both native & in a Win7 VM). Tried several of the servers.

accepted: 8138/8319 (97.82%) for me on the local connection, so I think 502 is related to yac.dontmine.me and mineyac.dontmine.me , try mineyac3 it's not cloudflare

Nope, similar results:
[2013-05-10 10:19:29] 8 miner threads started, using 'scrypt-jane' algorithm.
[2013-05-10 10:19:51] HTTP request failed: Failed connect to mineyac3.dontmine.m
e:8080; No error
[2013-05-10 10:19:51] json_rpc_call failed, retry after 30 seconds
[2013-05-10 10:20:34] Long-polling activated for http://mineyac3.dontmine.me:808
0/LP
[2013-05-10 10:20:34] thread 3: 4096 hashes, 12.96 khash/s
[2013-05-10 10:20:34] thread 1: 4096 hashes, 12.05 khash/s
[2013-05-10 10:20:34] thread 6: 4096 hashes, 10.29 khash/s
[2013-05-10 10:20:34] thread 0: 4096 hashes, 10.67 khash/s
[2013-05-10 10:20:34] thread 4: 4096 hashes, 12.84 khash/s
[2013-05-10 10:20:34] thread 7: 4096 hashes, 10.45 khash/s
[2013-05-10 10:20:34] thread 5: 4096 hashes, 9.06 khash/s
[2013-05-10 10:20:34] thread 2: 4096 hashes, 9.64 khash/s
[2013-05-10 10:20:39] thread 6: 64481 hashes, 13.02 khash/s
[2013-05-10 10:20:57] LONGPOLL detected new block
[2013-05-10 10:21:04] thread 7: 362667 hashes, 12.28 khash/s
[2013-05-10 10:21:04] thread 6: 20 hashes, 10.00 khash/s
[2013-05-10 10:21:04] thread 3: 194475 hashes, 6.55 khash/s
[2013-05-10 10:21:04] thread 4: 13945 hashes, 0.47 khash/s
[2013-05-10 10:21:04] accepted: 0/1 (0.00%), 60.63 khash/s (booooo)
[2013-05-10 10:21:06] thread 4: 28324 hashes, 12.47 khash/s

[2013-05-10 10:22:02] thread 0: 32646 hashes, 8.28 khash/s
[2013-05-10 10:22:03] thread 7: 269427 hashes, 8.98 khash/s
[2013-05-10 10:22:05] LONGPOLL detected new block
[2013-05-10 10:22:09] thread 5: 73403 hashes, 3.95 khash/s
[2013-05-10 10:22:26] HTTP request failed: Failed connect to mineyac3.dontmine.m
e:8080; No error
[2013-05-10 10:22:26] submit_upstream_work json_rpc_call failed
[2013-05-10 10:22:26] ...retry after 30 seconds
[2013-05-10 10:22:27] thread 4: 40262 hashes, 1.40 khash/s
[2013-05-10 10:22:31] thread 6: 279067 hashes, 10.33 khash/s
[2013-05-10 10:22:34] thread 1: 719558 hashes, 12.22 khash/s
[2013-05-10 10:22:38] thread 3: 626870 hashes, 9.65 khash/s
[2013-05-10 10:22:48] thread 2: 785565 hashes, 10.57 khash/s
[2013-05-10 10:23:18] HTTP request failed: Failed connect to mineyac3.dontmine.m
e:8080; No error
[2013-05-10 10:23:18] submit_upstream_work json_rpc_call failed
[2013-05-10 10:23:18] ...retry after 30 seconds
[2013-05-10 10:24:09] HTTP request failed: Failed connect to mineyac3.dontmine.m
e:8080; No error
[2013-05-10 10:24:09] submit_upstream_work json_rpc_call failed
[2013-05-10 10:24:09] ...retry after 30 seconds

etc. Huh

Rannasha

hero member

Activity: 728

Merit: 500

Quote from: paul21 on May 10, 2013, 08:14:52 AM

Quote from: Rannasha on May 10, 2013, 08:12:44 AM

Also getting a high reject-count (roughly 25% on both machines) coupled with periodic disconnect messages. Running on Ubuntu (both native & in a Win7 VM). Tried several of the servers.

accepted: 8138/8319 (97.82%) for me on the local connection, so I think 502 is related to yac.dontmine.me and mineyac.dontmine.me , try mineyac3 it's not cloudflare

ok, set one of my machines on mineyac3, lets see if it gets a better accept-rate.

The accept-rate was fine a while ago though, not sure when it started precisely.

paul21

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

Quote from: Rannasha on May 10, 2013, 08:12:44 AM

Also getting a high reject-count (roughly 25% on both machines) coupled with periodic disconnect messages. Running on Ubuntu (both native & in a Win7 VM). Tried several of the servers.

accepted: 8138/8319 (97.82%) for me on the local connection, so I think 502 is related to yac.dontmine.me and mineyac.dontmine.me , try mineyac3 it's not cloudflare

Maniac

hero member

Activity: 868

Merit: 1000

Quote from: theking on May 10, 2013, 03:17:25 AM

Its the same link as given by here

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2085725

but still be careful
also itll show up as the bitcoin miner on virustotal which I assume the original minerd also does but this may not nescessarily means its 100% safe/unsafe

run in vm/sandbox
also in linux itll give u way higher hashrate

Thank you!
This is win32 miner. Is exist 64-bit miner? Core i5 760 @ 2.80 Ghz - 46 kh/s is good speed?

Rannasha

hero member

Activity: 728

Merit: 500

Also getting a high reject-count (roughly 25% on both machines) coupled with periodic disconnect messages. Running on Ubuntu (both native & in a Win7 VM). Tried several of the servers.

paul21

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

Neverest

newbie

Activity: 70

Merit: 0

I am also getting lots of stales (running under windows):

Biggest problem is connection, it seems?

Quote

[2013-05-10 09:53:10] thread 3: 73641 hashes, 4.50 khash/s
[2013-05-10 09:53:10] thread 2: 226694 hashes, 12.62 khash/s
[2013-05-10 09:53:23] HTTP request failed: Operation timed out after 30997 milli
seconds with 0 out of -1 bytes received
[2013-05-10 09:53:23] submit_upstream_work json_rpc_call failed
[2013-05-10 09:53:23] ...retry after 30 seconds
[2013-05-10 09:54:09] HTTP request failed: The requested URL returned error: 502
Bad Gateway
[2013-05-10 09:54:09] submit_upstream_work json_rpc_call failed
[2013-05-10 09:54:09] ...retry after 30 seconds
[2013-05-10 09:54:54] HTTP request failed: The requested URL returned error: 502
Bad Gateway
[2013-05-10 09:54:54] submit_upstream_work json_rpc_call failed
[2013-05-10 09:54:54] ...retry after 30 seconds
[2013-05-10 09:55:40] HTTP request failed: The requested URL returned error: 502
Bad Gateway
[2013-05-10 09:55:40] submit_upstream_work json_rpc_call failed
[2013-05-10 09:55:40] ...retry after 30 seconds
[2013-05-10 09:56:25] HTTP request failed: The requested URL returned error: 502
Bad Gateway
[2013-05-10 09:56:25] submit_upstream_work json_rpc_call failed
[2013-05-10 09:56:25] ...retry after 30 seconds
[2013-05-10 09:57:11] HTTP request failed: The requested URL returned error: 502
Bad Gateway
[2013-05-10 09:57:11] submit_upstream_work json_rpc_call failed
[2013-05-10 09:57:11] ...retry after 30 seconds
[2013-05-10 09:57:56] HTTP request failed: The requested URL returned error: 502
Bad Gateway
[2013-05-10 09:57:56] submit_upstream_work json_rpc_call failed
[2013-05-10 09:57:56] ...retry after 30 seconds
[2013-05-10 09:58:27] accepted: 1/2 (50.00%), 62.64 khash/s (booooo)
[2013-05-10 09:58:28] accepted: 1/3 (33.33%), 62.64 khash/s (booooo)
[2013-05-10 09:58:28] Long-polling activated for http://mineyac.dontmine.me:8080
/LP
[2013-05-10 09:58:29] thread 7: 15488 hashes, 12.84 khash/s
[2013-05-10 09:58:32] thread 4: 49551 hashes, 12.89 khash/s
[2013-05-10 09:58:33] thread 2: 59501 hashes, 12.36 khash/s
[2013-05-10 09:58:39] accepted: 2/4 (50.00%), 86.34 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2013-05-10 09:58:40] accepted: 3/5 (60.00%), 86.34 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2013-05-10 09:58:43] LONGPOLL detected new block
[2013-05-10 09:58:43] thread 1: 143056 hashes, 9.54 khash/s
[2013-05-10 09:58:43] thread 3: 175437 hashes, 11.73 khash/s
[2013-05-10 09:58:43] thread 4: 61098 hashes, 13.12 khash/s
[2013-05-10 09:58:43] thread 0: 62878 hashes, 4.19 khash/s
[2013-05-10 09:58:43] thread 6: 19530 hashes, 1.31 khash/s
[2013-05-10 09:58:43] thread 2: 20946 hashes, 6.34 khash/s
[2013-05-10 09:58:43] thread 5: 167487 hashes, 11.17 khash/s
[2013-05-10 09:58:48] LONGPOLL detected new block
[2013-05-10 09:58:48] thread 4: 64145 hashes, 12.74 khash/s
[2013-05-10 09:58:43] thread 7: 14634 hashes, 3.14 khash/s
[2013-05-10 09:58:49] thread 0: 67879 hashes, 12.96 khash/s
[2013-05-10 09:58:49] thread 5: 248 hashes, 13.78 khash/s
[2013-05-10 09:58:49] thread 1: 68157 hashes, 12.78 khash/s
[2013-05-10 09:58:49] thread 3: 66818 hashes, 12.54 khash/s
[2013-05-10 09:58:49] thread 6: 8049 hashes, 3.38 khash/s
[2013-05-10 09:58:49] thread 2: 283 hashes, 13.48 khash/s
[2013-05-10 09:58:50] thread 4: 12376 hashes, 10.36 khash/s
[2013-05-10 09:58:55] thread 5: 77115 hashes, 12.25 khash/s
[2013-05-10 09:59:07] thread 0: 223817 hashes, 12.16 khash/s
[2013-05-10 09:59:11] thread 4: 69679 hashes, 3.39 khash/s
[2013-05-10 09:59:19] thread 1: 366488 hashes, 12.21 khash/s
[2013-05-10 09:59:21] HTTP request failed: Operation timed out after 30046 milli
seconds with 0 out of -1 bytes received
[2013-05-10 09:59:21] submit_upstream_work json_rpc_call failed
[2013-05-10 09:59:21] ...retry after 30 seconds
[2013-05-10 09:59:27] thread 7: 188370 hashes, 4.93 khash/s
[2013-05-10 09:59:42] thread 6: 199715 hashes, 3.78 khash/s
[2013-05-10 09:59:42] thread 3: 407517 hashes, 7.66 khash/s
[2013-05-10 09:59:47] thread 5: 661684 hashes, 12.65 khash/s
[2013-05-10 09:59:53] thread 2: 795058 hashes, 12.50 khash/s
[2013-05-10 09:59:54] HTTP request failed: The requested URL returned error: 502
Bad Gateway
[2013-05-10 10:00:06] HTTP request failed: The requested URL returned error: 502
Bad Gateway
[2013-05-10 10:00:06] submit_upstream_work json_rpc_call failed
[2013-05-10 10:00:06] ...retry after 30 seconds
[2013-05-10 10:00:52] HTTP request failed: The requested URL returned error: 502
Bad Gateway
[2013-05-10 10:00:52] submit_upstream_work json_rpc_call failed
[2013-05-10 10:00:52] ...retry after 30 seconds
[2013-05-10 10:01:37] HTTP request failed: The requested URL returned error: 502
Bad Gateway
[2013-05-10 10:01:37] submit_upstream_work json_rpc_call failed
[2013-05-10 10:01:37] ...retry after 30 seconds
[2013-05-10 10:02:23] HTTP request failed: The requested URL returned error: 502
Bad Gateway
[2013-05-10 10:02:23] submit_upstream_work json_rpc_call failed
[2013-05-10 10:02:23] ...retry after 30 seconds
[2013-05-10 10:03:08] HTTP request failed: The requested URL returned error: 502
Bad Gateway
[2013-05-10 10:03:08] submit_upstream_work json_rpc_call failed
[2013-05-10 10:03:08] ...retry after 30 seconds
[2013-05-10 10:03:54] HTTP request failed: The requested URL returned error: 502
Bad Gateway
[2013-05-10 10:03:54] submit_upstream_work json_rpc_call failed
[2013-05-10 10:03:54] ...retry after 30 seconds

Etc.
It this because of ddos?

paul21

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

The block chain keeps forking and then leaving a string of blocks as orphan. The blocks get 20+ confirms and then orphan.

Can you try:
addnode=67.162.14.58
addnode=72.8.182.2

To your yacoin.conf

The server has 24+ connections but I'm going to setup some other nodes to connect to it (don't want to publish the IP until I have the backups in place)

gubb3l

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

Quote from: sairon on May 10, 2013, 08:00:34 AM

Quote from: Rannasha on May 10, 2013, 07:58:23 AM

I wonder if it matters that I'm running my desktop-miner in a VM (other than the usual overhead-cost from the VM). Does the compiler accurately pick up what the native architecture is?

Why do you mine in a VM? Cheesy

because actuall i´m under windows and i is the simplest way to get linux running on my maschine Wink

Rannasha

hero member

Activity: 728

Merit: 500

Quote from: sairon on May 10, 2013, 08:00:34 AM

Quote from: Rannasha on May 10, 2013, 07:58:23 AM

I wonder if it matters that I'm running my desktop-miner in a VM (other than the usual overhead-cost from the VM). Does the compiler accurately pick up what the native architecture is?

Why do you mine in a VM? Cheesy

Don't have Linux on my desktop as I use a number of Windows-only programs (= games). I'm not a very dedicated miner ^^ My laptop runs Linux natively, since it is my OS of choice.

sairon

sr. member

Activity: 406

Merit: 250

One does not simply mine Bitcoins

Quote from: Rannasha on May 10, 2013, 07:58:23 AM

I wonder if it matters that I'm running my desktop-miner in a VM (other than the usual overhead-cost from the VM). Does the compiler accurately pick up what the native architecture is?

Why do you mine in a VM? Cheesy

e521

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: p00chie on May 10, 2013, 07:27:14 AM

anyone else getting high reject rates?
14/50 atm

with http://mineyac.dontmine.me:8080 server

no, 2945/3172 (92.84%)

Quote from: 🏰 TradeFortress 🏰 on May 10, 2013, 07:57:29 AM

You should make an announcement on altcoinforum.org!

is this spam going to end up anytime soon? -_-

Rannasha

hero member

Activity: 728

Merit: 500

Quote from: sairon on May 10, 2013, 07:56:26 AM

Quote from: Rannasha on May 10, 2013, 07:54:44 AM

and got decent, but not world-shattering improvements.

Well, it depends on the number of HW-specific optimizations the compiler can do, so YMMV.

True.

I wonder if it matters that I'm running my desktop-miner in a VM (other than the usual overhead-cost from the VM). Does the compiler accurately pick up what the native architecture is?

gpudude

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

GPUDude

Quote from: sairon on May 10, 2013, 07:56:26 AM

Quote from: Rannasha on May 10, 2013, 07:54:44 AM

and got decent, but not world-shattering improvements.

Well, it depends on the number of HW-specific optimizations the compiler can do, so YMMV.

200 -> 240

thank you

Nothing appears under unconfirmed... is this working correctly?

Topic: [ANN][YAC] YAC Simple Pool [LP] - page 5. (Read 16003 times)