How do you actually argue that prediction as a sensible one? Genuine question. Some would argue that precisely because ZEC has grown so much in popularity (and value) due to the JP Morgan partnership and also HushPool adding it as the only altcoin for mining besides Bitcoin, then ZEC is predicted to grow steadily with less volatility, and that most z-derivatives would gradually die off. The tech being solid isn't necessarily indicative, what counts being the mood. Money makes money and the same can be said about trust/preference - the coins who got some attention will continue to attract more attention. I certainly don't want the market to end up dominated by 2-3 powerful coins, but these things have a liberal bias up to a point (miners will migrate towards what's more profitable at the moment, the plethora of penny traders buying what's more popular and stable, etc). What do you see as ZEN's potential to attract enough attention to change the community's mood and big players' trust/preference? The tech can't be the only thing -- plenty of coins have good and nice tech.
Miners will always follow profitability, this is right, but try to mine any coin that is listed in
https://whattomine.com/ you will find out all coins have miners. Even forgont coins have supportive miners, who at lest traying to prolong inavitable..
ZEN is new and it is cheap alternative to ZCASH, im sure this can can be quite convincing for some people. By the way all this is nothing without support of comunity, team and community will lead it to succes.
JP Morgan partnership..This has only potential of exploit, PnD., endless game. Nothing more, and nothing good for investors.
