I read the white paper, I haven't read this entire thread.
My initial problem with the paper was the following:
1 - I don't know of any active botnets working over the gpu. If they did I suspect that pc users would note the high amounts of heat and active cooling fans and request a fix from however supports their hardware
a - almost all of the mining is don by gpu now (soon to be fpgas), in other words you would need about 50 standards botnet pc's using their cpu to equal one miner with a gpu
b - for a perspective of the current cpu power in bitcoin the current fastest networked government owned super computer produces about 4.7 pflops where as the bitcoin community is beyond 53.5 pflops (factor of 10 larger in processing). to achieve 50% of this with cpu based botnets one would need to acquire 100's of thousands of systems
2 - There is no economical analysis of other values botnets can have. ie. it may very well be more profitable to operate a botnet to brute force a bank for account access
3 - There is no analysis of the declining rate of bitcoin production. This is not a never ending game of producing bitcoins. To date about 40% of bitcoins have been released. If we were flooded with mass amounts of botnet gpu's it would help to secure the block chain, and also automatically enable competition/incentive for other botnet owners to move into the space (again securing the block chain further), it would cause normal users to exit the market (non-botnet operators), and create a renaissance of new mining innovation
Topic: Another respected cryptographer predicts collapse in bitcoin mining (Read 10764 times)
February 29, 2012, 01:05:04 AM
February 28, 2012, 03:52:24 PM
Quote from: Rassah
means those with the highest coin holdings (wealthiest) are the only ones able to sign blocks and transactions, being able to do it without requiring heavy work. The reasoning is that since they have the most coin wealth, they have the most to lose, and thus they won't try to screw the network, lest they crash the price of the coin and lose everything. The idea is also that they will have the most incentive to protect it.
Prof-of-stake sounds like a good idea only until you realize that it already exists, and is called USD and Federal Reserve.
Prof-of-stake sounds like a good idea only until you realize that it already exists, and is called USD and Federal Reserve.
It sounds like a bad idea. I heard of another one recently called ripple, ripple-project.org. A trust-based system but doesn't seem like a lasting idea.
February 26, 2012, 11:04:20 AM
The sell price is lower now than in July. Are you saying that makes mining more worthwhile? I fail to see your logic here. 
looking at bitcoincharts, the lowest the price dipped in july was around $12. the lowest in august was around $7.
and either way, your post still was completely non sequitur to mine.
this.
it seems that many ppl around here fail to realize that at least 50% of the population is willing to think counterintuitively, aka, buy the dips.
February 26, 2012, 11:00:01 AM
The sell price is lower now than in July. Are you saying that makes mining more worthwhile? I fail to see your logic here.
looking at bitcoincharts, the lowest the price dipped in july was around $12. the lowest in august was around $7.
and either way, your post still was completely non sequitur to mine.
February 26, 2012, 09:40:55 AM
Just for reference.
Difficulty and hashrate, linear:
exponential axis:
Gartner hype graph:
One has to understand that right after the GPU breakthrough in mining there hasn't really been any game changer (maybe FPGA's if they enter in sufficient quantity and when they do) and also that the Radeon 5xxx HD series hasn't really been beaten in terms of bang for the buck, as one would expect years after their release. Basically you cannot get a much better card than a high end 5xxx series for mining, as one would expect 2 generations later.
Difficulty and hashrate, linear:
exponential axis:
Gartner hype graph:
One has to understand that right after the GPU breakthrough in mining there hasn't really been any game changer (maybe FPGA's if they enter in sufficient quantity and when they do) and also that the Radeon 5xxx HD series hasn't really been beaten in terms of bang for the buck, as one would expect years after their release. Basically you cannot get a much better card than a high end 5xxx series for mining, as one would expect 2 generations later.
February 26, 2012, 09:18:59 AM
The sell price is lower now than in July. Are you saying that makes mining more worthwhile? I fail to see your logic here.
looking at bitcoincharts, the lowest the price dipped in july was around $12. the lowest in august was around $7.
and either way, your post still was completely non sequitur to mine.
February 26, 2012, 09:12:59 AM
Hashrate has fallen since July. Bitcoin isn't worth mining right now, but it is worth buying.
and the sell price in july vs the sell price now? I mean really...
I suppose for some very efficient mining rigs it may be marginally profitable, especially if the heat is valued as well. My mining rig will be shut down very soon if the price does not increase with the outside temperature.
February 26, 2012, 09:04:48 AM
until that shitload of people then realize that bitcoin is a great investment because it's worth hundreds of dollars and decide to hoard instead.
because it's a great investment people are going to stop mining? I don't follow your logic one bit
It's worth mining for some people who have the right equipment. I agree that it's worth buying for most people more than it's worth mining, right now. Esp. if you don't have any decent mining equipment beforehand.
Hashrate declined sharply right after the Big Crash but has been catching up ever since and it's close to historical maximums already.
February 26, 2012, 08:38:33 AM
Hashrate has fallen since July. Bitcoin isn't worth mining right now, but it is worth buying.
and the sell price in july vs the sell price now? I mean really...
February 26, 2012, 08:37:09 AM
until that shitload of people then realize that bitcoin is a great investment because it's worth hundreds of dollars and decide to hoard instead.
because it's a great investment people are going to stop mining? I don't follow your logic one bit
February 26, 2012, 08:35:38 AM
until that shitload of people then realize that bitcoin is a great investment because it's worth hundreds of dollars and decide to hoard instead.
because it's a great investment people are going to stop mining? I don't follow your logic one bit
February 26, 2012, 08:21:13 AM
until that shitload of people then realize that bitcoin is a great investment because it's worth hundreds of dollars and decide to hoard instead.
because it's a great investment people are going to stop mining? I don't follow your logic one bit
February 26, 2012, 08:09:39 AM
If bitcoin serves only a small fraction of today's undergound economy, it can be shown that the price of bitcoins should be in the hundreds of dollars, far above the electricity cost component of the price.
until a shitload more people start mining realizing that there is profit to be had... it's not like we haven't seen this already
February 26, 2012, 08:01:55 AM
If bitcoin serves only a small fraction of today's undergound economy, it can be shown that the price of bitcoins should be in the hundreds of dollars, far above the electricity cost component of the price.
until a shitload more people start mining realizing that there is profit to be had... it's not like we haven't seen this already
February 26, 2012, 06:35:06 AM
if there's one thing we've learned about these doom and gloom papers is that talk is cheap.
We have a lot of "experts"willing to throw around theories but not willing to put up the money, time, our effort to actually demonstrate their hypotheses.
If there was anything to what they have to say then they'd just take those millions and run
We have a lot of "experts"willing to throw around theories but not willing to put up the money, time, our effort to actually demonstrate their hypotheses.
If there was anything to what they have to say then they'd just take those millions and run
What the hell are you talking about? What would you have the experts do to demonstrate their hypothesis?
From a quick read of the paper, it seems that the authors consider price of electricity (in USD) and exchange rate of the bitcoins (BTC/USD) to be independent variables.
This hypothesis is most certainly wrong.
However the price of electricity over time becomes a very small driver of the BTC price as the main driver is the growing demand as the bitcoin economy grows.
If bitcoin serves only a small fraction of today's undergound economy, it can be shown that the price of bitcoins should be in the hundreds of dollars, far above the electricity cost component of the price.
February 26, 2012, 02:56:58 AM
Quote from: cunicula
Proof-of-work is fatally flawed and in the future alternative cryptocurrency will be based on a more sensible architecture... proof-of-stake.
Can you give an example of proof-of-stake? Not clear on what you mean.
It means those with the highest coin holdings (wealthiest) are the only ones able to sign blocks and transactions, being able to do it without requiring heavy work. The reasoning is that since they have the most coin wealth, they have the most to lose, and thus they won't try to screw the network, lest they crash the price of the coin and lose everything. The idea is also that they will have the most incentive to protect it.
Prof-of-stake sounds like a good idea only until you realize that it already exists, and is called USD and Federal Reserve.
February 26, 2012, 01:13:50 AM
Quote from: cunicula
Proof-of-work is fatally flawed and in the future alternative cryptocurrency will be based on a more sensible architecture... proof-of-stake.
Can you give an example of proof-of-stake? Not clear on what you mean.
February 25, 2012, 02:43:53 PM
[Don't get me started on Austrian economics because that is complete wackjob rubbish that asshats believe in. I'm not responding to asshats here. It is not an enjoyable use of my time.]
Neither, it is enjoyable for us "asshats" to use our time to read your rubbish. Do everyone a favor, stop posting anything at all.
February 25, 2012, 02:20:39 PM
Quote from: cunicula
Proof-of-work is fatally flawed and in the future alternative cryptocurrency will be based on a more sensible architecture... proof-of-stake.
Can you give an example of proof-of-stake? Not clear on what you mean.
February 25, 2012, 02:07:54 PM
if there's one thing we've learned about these doom and gloom papers is that talk is cheap.
We have a lot of "experts"willing to throw around theories but not willing to put up the money, time, our effort to actually demonstrate their hypotheses.
If there was anything to what they have to say then they'd just take those millions and run
We have a lot of "experts"willing to throw around theories but not willing to put up the money, time, our effort to actually demonstrate their hypotheses.
If there was anything to what they have to say then they'd just take those millions and run
What the hell are you talking about? What would you have the experts do to demonstrate their hypothesis?
ok, let me spell it out for you.
if i were smart enough to develop a way exploit Bitcoin's code, i would either sell it for millions to someone who had the resources to implement the exploit or i would do it myself. anyone can talk but the only way to prove it would be to do it.
You could also try to patch the exploit, would attempting to do that indicate stupidity?
Moreover, how is this relevant to the article? They are not even talking about an exploit.
Moreover, why would an exploit be worth millions? How could you extract that much of bitcoin's value before the bitcoin price collapsed. The most straightforward way of extracting value would be shorting on bitcoinica. It would be difficult to recover millions doing this. Do you picture Bitcoinica/Mt.Gox releasing money to people who place million dollar short bets right before an attack? Even if they were willing, do they even have that much liquidity lying around?
I don't agree with these guys, but your comments seem to be off in lala land.
you're right in the sense that its impractical to extracts millions from the chain or exchanges. but i do think there are entities out there that would pay millions to destroy Bitcoin.
Jump to: