Pages:
Author

Topic: Another Satoshi filed claim for Bitcoin Whitepaper (Read 742 times)

member
Activity: 854
Merit: 12
arcs-chain.com
These guys are making fun of crypto users...
Everyone that awards importance to this s*it is opening the door for scam and for more and more statoshi comming on the future... nowadays, I think they are close to be enough for a football team....
just look at Craig personal Bitcoin... people buy it, value is good.... so time for another satoshi to try to grab a piece of the pie
full member
Activity: 658
Merit: 100
Absolutely anyone can apply but all of them are actors because Satoshi Nakamoto will never announce who he is with Bitcoin's anonymity and he will never appear in public even though only once.
legendary
Activity: 2030
Merit: 1569
CLEAN non GPL infringing code made in Rust lang
With Craig Wrights disputed copyright claim on Bitcoin Whitepaper made in the the United States Copyright Office, he got many abusive response and still been able to pump his private currency upto 90%.
Now comes another one to challenge Craigs Claim,



A person called Wei Liu has filed for the copyright of Bitcoin Whitepaper.

And yet another one. A hundred Satoshi wannabes, yet none can sign proof, or, i don't know, login in this forum made by him/her...
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 18711
Literally anyone can claim that they are Satoshi Nakamoto since there are no clues to dispute their claims such as the nationality, facial features, or even what blood type Satoshi Nakamoto is they can't really ignore this claimants.
That's not how the burden of proof works. If you make a claim like "I am Satoshi", the onus is on you to provide evidence to prove your claim. No one else is obligated to provide evidence to disprove your claim. I can't just go around saying to people "Prove I'm not Satoshi", just like I can't say to people "Prove I'm not Jesus".

Yes, literally anyone can claim they are Satoshi, but if, like CSW, they are not going to provide a single shred of legitimate evidence to support that claim, then they should all be rightly ignored.
hero member
Activity: 1806
Merit: 672
Literally anyone can claim that they are Satoshi Nakamoto since there are no clues to dispute their claims such as the nationality, facial features, or even what blood type Satoshi Nakamoto is they can't really ignore this claimants. That's the bad thing about Satoshi Nakamoto being anonymous because he is so mysterious that anyone could step in and might be identified as Satoshi and with how our legal system works I know that even if don't have enough proof that he is Satoshi Nakamoto he could still be successful on claiming it.
member
Activity: 322
Merit: 20
Donating 10% to charity
Lol another one, it's a joke at this point, although faketoshi clearly achieved what he wanted and his bullshit coin was pumped. Clearly the guy who filed the copyright claim this time did so in order to mock Wright, perhaps Mcafee is right and Satoshi is alive and he knows who he is, although you can't be too sure of Mcafee's words.

Precisely that's what makes Mcafee's words so powerful my friend. The thing is, we'll never know probably.

A guy so smart like Satoshi could pretend to be dead so easily and flawless that we wouldn't know for sure, revealing it to only some the truly trusts. And to be fair, with the experiences i had in this world in my not so many years of life people cannot be trusted. At the end that is his decision, not mine.

If someone knows, he might be between one of them. At the it's just conspiracy theories, the best way of keeping information safe.
hero member
Activity: 1400
Merit: 505
Does anyone know Satoshi's true identity? Why does everyone recognize themselves as Satoshi and try to accept them as owners of Bitcoin? Why hasn't anyone given the source code that created Bitcoin as evidence to prove that they are its owners? Greed always tries to make people worse.
Hope you are aware that the source code is open for the world to see and how do you propose someone could provide that as evidence, anyone can file for copyright and if someone opposes and could provide evidence then they have to settle that in the court and only the real creator could provide the evidence what all he did with the original papers and the digital fingerprints could be used to prove that, till now i have not heard about anyone being prosecuted for providing false claims.
full member
Activity: 593
Merit: 100
BBOD The Best Derivatives Exchange
Does anyone know Satoshi's true identity? Why does everyone recognize themselves as Satoshi and try to accept them as owners of Bitcoin? Why hasn't anyone given the source code that created Bitcoin as evidence to prove that they are its owners? Greed always tries to make people worse.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1068
WOLF.BET - Provably Fair Crypto Casino
I really can't understand what is the point and why some claim they are Satoshi. I wonder if they are so naive to think that someone will really believe them.
Satoshi has every right to hide the identity and not to reveal himself. But as long as he stays anonimous there will be such attempts.
hero member
Activity: 1064
Merit: 505
Lol another one, it's a joke at this point, although faketoshi clearly achieved what he wanted and his bullshit coin was pumped. Clearly the guy who filed the copyright claim this time did so in order to mock Wright, perhaps Mcafee is right and Satoshi is alive and he knows who he is, although you can't be too sure of Mcafee's words.
full member
Activity: 874
Merit: 125
Yes, that is what they should do to finish this adventure of looking for Satoshi! Freaking get that wallet open and move just one bitcoin and Voila you are the real one. As of now, no one can do it.
That is what he should do, but he never will, because he can't. It's been obvious for a long time that CSW is a fraud, but it is now becoming so painfully obvious that you wonder why anyone at all is still shilling BSV. All these stupid publicity stunts - forging fake signatures, faking a backdated PGP key, faking blog posts, now filing a meaningless copyright application - all just add to the mountains of evidence that he is not only a fraud, but a technically incompetent one at that.

BSV could be a good coin but certainly CSW isn't. You can fool some for sometime but you can't live on a lie.
It would be no difficult for the real Satoshi Nakamoto to prove his identity if he really wanted to.
If he don't we should all respect his will to stay anonymous. I do believe there are several people who actually know who the real Satoshi is and they would speak in case he was dead.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 18711
Yes, that is what they should do to finish this adventure of looking for Satoshi! Freaking get that wallet open and move just one bitcoin and Voila you are the real one. As of now, no one can do it.
That is what he should do, but he never will, because he can't. It's been obvious for a long time that CSW is a fraud, but it is now becoming so painfully obvious that you wonder why anyone at all is still shilling BSV. All these stupid publicity stunts - forging fake signatures, faking a backdated PGP key, faking blog posts, now filing a meaningless copyright application - all just add to the mountains of evidence that he is not only a fraud, but a technically incompetent one at that.
hero member
Activity: 3024
Merit: 651
I want a claim too.  Grin

But the problem is how can I move 1 BTC to the wallet of satoshi.
That could be one good proof for me to have relevance to the claim of being Satoshi Nakamoto.

Yes, that is what they should do to finish this adventure of looking for Satoshi! Freaking get that wallet open and move just one bitcoin and Voila you are the real one. As of now, no one can do it.  Grin
full member
Activity: 1055
Merit: 103
www.Artemis.co
The Satoshi seems to have a good knowledge of English language both American and British and had a strong desire of making himself anonymous from the very beginning. This doesn't prove anything yet but it probably suggest Satoshi was learned in English language. And was fully aware where his experimental network could led into.
sr. member
Activity: 1150
Merit: 260
☆Gaget-Pack☆
With Craig Wrights disputed copyright claim on Bitcoin Whitepaper made in the the United States Copyright Office, he got many abusive response and still been able to pump his private currency upto 90%.
Now comes another one to challenge Craigs Claim,



A person called Wei Liu has filed for the copyright of Bitcoin Whitepaper.

https://www.coindesk.com/another-satoshi-second-copyright-filing-appears-for-bitcoin-white-paper
Satoshi Nakamoto is a Japanese name, no? This guy claims to be from China where anti-Japanese sentiment in China is among the strongest in the world. He's contradicting himself, who the hell is this guy supposed to be anyway? A poser most likely, in a world overrun with selfishness and vanity, I expect more to come forward in an attempt to get their 15 minutes of fame also.
    The real Satoshi will most likely never come forward, he/she is clearly hidden in plain sight. Satoshi went out of his/her way to remain anonymous. I doubt he/she breaks the law of concealment. Those with the ears to hear will know!
  Just my two cents!
sr. member
Activity: 1778
Merit: 309
But absolutely anyone can file a claim right? that's established. It means nothing.
And wow, we need to get rid of these kind of actors(CSW primarily) from this space, looks like a playground from the outside world.
Good luck adoption.

Indeed. And I wonder why people think that this is hot news. Anyone can claim it but we will never know who is the real.
And apart from that, is CSW claimed the copyrights why BSV is pumped and not BTC? He filed claims for BTC and not BSV. I truly believe that there are a lot of naive people in the market even after all this bear market.

Exactly, it’s weird that a lot of people find it very interesting, I think this happened because a lot of people is wondering who is the real Satoshi and been trying to find him thus a lot will also come out filing claims. Well, naive people are always there whether we like it or not, I was just wondering as well what is it for us or them to know who the real Satoshi is? I just don’t think it will have any affect on the price of BTC whether he comes out or not, just saying.
full member
Activity: 1456
Merit: 148
But absolutely anyone can file a claim right? that's established. It means nothing.
And wow, we need to get rid of these kind of actors(CSW primarily) from this space, looks like a playground from the outside world.
Good luck adoption.

As others has already stated, it will only cost the sum of $35 only for anyone to fill the copyright form and be eligible to join the struggle. But they are all going to face the reward at the end when the real Satoshi will be on ground. Most of these drama are for fame and nothing more. 
member
Activity: 518
Merit: 11
HODL
There is some generosity around this issue. I remembered the fake information related to Craig Wright - BSV and a century trick with a continuous scanner for over 50% of the added value. Perhaps, the community's expectations for Satoshi's appearance have been set up with many proactive plans. Satoshi is still a mystery so far and no one will recognize him if he doesn't want it.
full member
Activity: 392
Merit: 100
We are definitely going to see more of this filing for the patent right. They all know they are not Satoshi, they equally know that Satoshi will never go to court to proof his identity, they actually want fame and want to be popular, before now, Craig Wright was not as popular as we have today, it's better to have a good name and be famous for the right course than claiming what is not yours.


Just wait until btc cross the $50k or $100k mark and oh boy! I'm ready to see a lot of clowns claiming they are the true creator of of the king of crypto. But honestly for me, I think the person will only have a higher chance of claiming that they are the real Satoshi is either living in US or Japan.
hero member
Activity: 1834
Merit: 759
What do you mean probably?

Wei Liu: “I filed it just to let people know anyone can register a copyright. Everyone can be Satoshi Nakamoto.”

Well you are wrong, only one person is Satoshi, everyone can pretend to be Satoshi. There was one Michael Jackson or Nikola Tesla, there was many impersonators or posers.

https://www.coindesk.com/everyone-can-be-satoshi-wei-liu-on-contesting-craig-wrights-copyright

I'm sure he didn't mean it literally. What he's essentially saying is that everyone is just as much Satoshi as CSW is lol.

Considering how erratic CSW is being though, I would be surprised if he takes this lying down. It seems like he's already acknowledged it, but I'm expecting him to take it to court lol. Ready your popcorns!
Pages:
Jump to: