Pages:
Author

Topic: Another Satoshi filed claim for Bitcoin Whitepaper - page 2. (Read 765 times)

member
Activity: 224
Merit: 62
It is a criminal offense claiming copyright if not the original developer.
A criminal offence with a maximum $2500 fine.  $2500 + $55 vs how many millions from the BSV pump/dump?  Seems to me that Wright had a great ROI on his latest fraud.  ... even better if the US government never bothers prosecuting, AFAICT they never have before.

This system blows, like a lot, can we just start the bitcoin democracy voting thing yet, that would be cool. Everyone join the "faithless religion" and bitcoin society and we shall dominate the entire nebula. We will start with international waters here on earth, trust me we want to be on a boat for what is coming out in orbit would be a bit better for 6 hours.

faithless religion
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/the-churchcall-it-whatever-you-want-of-bitcoin-5141757



the voting thing and system
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoin-20-attention-all-alt-coin-devs-unite-if-you-are-willing-5141142

the new fiat, but better.




anyways I am off to bed, goodnight team.
member
Activity: 420
Merit: 20
simply getting the job done
This is already turning into a melodramatic series. Soon among the people who claim to be Satoshi, intrigues and alliances against other Satoshi will begin. Game of thrones cheap format. Somehow it is pathetic and does not cause respect. If a person initially did not give his name and took a fictitious pseudonym, then why did he decide to reveal his name to the world? Probably because this is not this person. More HYIP baby more HYIP.
copper member
Activity: 448
Merit: 0
StableDex | Decentralized, Secure & Cost Effective
These set of people are just making fun of crypto world and I think this need to put to an end , but it also show the CW that any one can file copy of right and if this continue then who is satashi will be the question .

I hope he get his right sense and stop misleading his follower for the sake of this ecosystem.
member
Activity: 845
Merit: 52
We are definitely going to see more of this filing for the patent right. They all know they are not Satoshi, they equally know that Satoshi will never go to court to proof his identity, they actually want fame and want to be popular, before now, Craig Wright was not as popular as we have today, it's better to have a good name and be famous for the right course than claiming what is not yours.
full member
Activity: 1554
Merit: 116
0xe25ce19226C3CE65204570dB8D6c6DB1E9Df74AC
No one will believe me, Steve Jobs are Satoshi Nakamoto, and all his copyrights has since been forgotten, CSW just stepping on it and want to inherit his legacy so badly.😂
sr. member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 355
But absolutely anyone can file a claim right? That's established. It means nothing. And wow, we need to get rid of this kind of actors (CSW primarily) from this space, looks like a playground from the outside world. Good luck adoption.

Yes, you just have to pay some amount of dollar and you can file the copyright claim. Now, the CSW claim is getting interesting now that there is someone claiming the same thing. Let's see what will be the next move of sir Craig Wright on this matter. Will this angered him so he can exposed his own vulnerabilities? Or will he realized that he is just being played on by someone named Wei Liu? 
hero member
Activity: 1834
Merit: 879
Rollbit.com ⚔️Crypto Futures
This is getting interesting, now that Wei Liu did it first...this throws out Craig's claims of being Satoshi Nakamoto almost immediately, anyway let's see how this show goes, And if Craig is taking second place why does this not read "Satoshi steps out of the dark to claim whitepaper" or "bitcoin whitepaper copyright entanglement" unlike  https://www.coindesk.com/another-satoshi-second-copyright-filing-appears-for-bitcoin-white-paper
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1127
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I think those guys at U.S. Copyright Office should start thinking about creating a team to investigate anything that is Copyright subject in case two or more people to claim ownership of the same thing. because they will have major headaches from now on, first was faketoshi, then a Chinese guy, more scammers will appear... it will be an endless cycle
sr. member
Activity: 854
Merit: 281
With Craig Wrights disputed copyright claim on Bitcoin Whitepaper made in the the United States Copyright Office, he got many abusive response and still been able to pump his private currency upto 90%.
Now comes another one to challenge Craigs Claim,



A person called Wei Liu has filed for the copyright of Bitcoin Whitepaper.

https://www.coindesk.com/another-satoshi-second-copyright-filing-appears-for-bitcoin-white-paper

Great. I'd like to see more people file a copyright claim for the bitcoin whitepaper to drive the point that anyone could have registered for it. My view is that sooner or later the legal issues CSW is embroiled in will bring him down. You can only legally threaten people for so long before you begin to face consequences.
staff
Activity: 4284
Merit: 8808
It is a criminal offense claiming copyright if not the original developer.
A criminal offence with a maximum $2500 fine.  $2500 + $55 vs how many millions from the BSV pump/dump?  Seems to me that Wright had a great ROI on his latest fraud.  ... even better if the US government never bothers prosecuting, AFAICT they never have before.
hero member
Activity: 2968
Merit: 687
But absolutely anyone can file a claim right? that's established. It means nothing.

As far as I know, yes. And based on a Coindesk article last week, The "US Copyright Office Says It Does Not ‘Recognize’ Craig Wright as Satoshi": https://www.coindesk.com/us-copyright-office-says-it-does-not-recognize-craig-wright-as-satoshi

Wait til this Wei Liu guy forks BSV and names it Bitcoin Nakamoto's Vision.

He's probably trolling CSW to show that filing a claim means nothing and anybody can do it. It's strange that more people didn't do it if it's only 35$ and can buy you some personal promotion on crypto news sites like coindesk. This Liu paid a few dollars and now we're talking about him on bitcointalk. Worth every cent!
Maybe next week another "satoshi" will file a counterclaim.

What do you mean probably?

Wei Liu: “I filed it just to let people know anyone can register a copyright. Everyone can be Satoshi Nakamoto.”

Well you are wrong, only one person is Satoshi, everyone can pretend to be Satoshi. There was one Michael Jackson or Nikola Tesla, there was many impersonators or posers.

https://www.coindesk.com/everyone-can-be-satoshi-wei-liu-on-contesting-craig-wrights-copyright
I tried to find the reason of Wei Liu about such claim and thanks for sharing this link up.This do only proves out that anyone can be satoshi by paying up $35.
Only 4 people tried it so far and CW is the total bullshit of them all.
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 62
But absolutely anyone can file a claim right? that's established. It means nothing.

As far as I know, yes. And based on a Coindesk article last week, The "US Copyright Office Says It Does Not ‘Recognize’ Craig Wright as Satoshi": https://www.coindesk.com/us-copyright-office-says-it-does-not-recognize-craig-wright-as-satoshi

Wait til this Wei Liu guy forks BSV and names it Bitcoin Nakamoto's Vision.

He's probably trolling CSW to show that filing a claim means nothing and anybody can do it. It's strange that more people didn't do it if it's only 35$ and can buy you some personal promotion on crypto news sites like coindesk. This Liu paid a few dollars and now we're talking about him on bitcointalk. Worth every cent!
Maybe next week another "satoshi" will file a counterclaim.

What do you mean probably?

Wei Liu: “I filed it just to let people know anyone can register a copyright. Everyone can be Satoshi Nakamoto.”

Well you are wrong, only one person is Satoshi, everyone can pretend to be Satoshi. There was one Michael Jackson or Nikola Tesla, there was many impersonators or posers.

https://www.coindesk.com/everyone-can-be-satoshi-wei-liu-on-contesting-craig-wrights-copyright
hero member
Activity: 1274
Merit: 519
Coindragon.com 30% Cash Back
Sounds like more people are following the footsteps of Craig and that's insane. They are thinking that they will succeed through that strategy. Why don't they promote their own coins in their own ways? People will only hate them for doing such thing and might affect their coins as well.
sr. member
Activity: 1596
Merit: 335
It's easy for them to fake Satoshi for their own private coin's benefit but people now are aware of this dramas.
One person has done it and it's enough for most investors to notice who's lying and who's not.
I guess it would be better if we will just ignore them.
hero member
Activity: 2184
Merit: 531
But absolutely anyone can file a claim right? that's established. It means nothing.

As far as I know, yes. And based on a Coindesk article last week, The "US Copyright Office Says It Does Not ‘Recognize’ Craig Wright as Satoshi": https://www.coindesk.com/us-copyright-office-says-it-does-not-recognize-craig-wright-as-satoshi

Wait til this Wei Liu guy forks BSV and names it Bitcoin Nakamoto's Vision.

He's probably trolling CSW to show that filing a claim means nothing and anybody can do it. It's strange that more people didn't do it if it's only 35$ and can buy you some personal promotion on crypto news sites like coindesk. This Liu paid a few dollars and now we're talking about him on bitcointalk. Worth every cent!
Maybe next week another "satoshi" will file a counterclaim.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1196
STOP SNITCHIN'
But absolutely anyone can file a claim right? that's established. It means nothing.

And yet there's still plenty of BSV shills coming out of the woodworks claiming it's proof of something. At least now we can turn around and say, "Craig Wright is no more legitimate than Wei Liu."

I was hoping this stunt would tempt lots of other people to file similar copyright registrations, proving how silly the whole thing is. Maybe this is just the start. Smiley
legendary
Activity: 4424
Merit: 4794
the ronald registration has no mention or relevance to bitcoin.

"an equity based.." is nothing to do with it
so using ronald as an example is futile.

but the wei lin one is atleast relevant

what people need to know is in a court room. at a time of final judgement. CSW and wei lin would not win any case they got into if that case was defended.

BUT here is the issue

OUTSIDE a courtroom and before judgement or undefended. scammers like CSW can perform cease and desist scams on people with flimsy records with their name on.

these scams play out because scammers threaten large sums and make it so going to court is so expensive that the victims if naive pay a early settlement just to get the scammer to stop hassling them

much like them annoying malware that says pay up in 72 hours or have files deleted. you'd b surprised how many people pay up
sr. member
Activity: 1176
Merit: 301
Yes I've seen the news.This is another PR move by an unknown (at least to me) Chinese woman.The whole community is just having fun on who Satoshi is. Guys, I'm Satoshi!I'm thinking of applying tomorrow. Grin.
LOL anyone could put up an act like that the only question is are they willing to degrade their own like Craig?
The crypto community would just laugh and have fun with this so self proclaimed Satoshi ,
If they really want to act please give us a more interesting act with a good acting tools or proofs.
member
Activity: 980
Merit: 62
But absolutely anyone can file a claim right? that's established. It means nothing.
And wow, we need to get rid of these kind of actors(CSW primarily) from this space, looks like a playground from the outside world.
Good luck adoption.

Indeed. And I wonder why people think that this is hot news. Anyone can claim it but we will never know who is the real.
And apart from that, is CSW claimed the copyrights why BSV is pumped and not BTC? He filed claims for BTC and not BSV. I truly believe that there are a lot of naive people in the market even after all this bear market.
legendary
Activity: 3542
Merit: 1352
Cashback 15%
I think I'm gonna have to file my copyrights too just so I won't miss the party these guys are having right now. But seriously this just shows how inefficent and incredible the US copyright office is. They can literally just handout the copyright to anything and earn that measly $35 for the paperworks. For sure, legal consultation + court proceedings in the event of a dispute is already anticipated by them, that's why they easily give the copyrights to literally anything without verifying the claims.

Kudos to Wei Liu anyway for making CSW look like a fool!
Pages:
Jump to: