Pages:
Author

Topic: Another unfair trust/feedback from user Timelord2067 (Read 493 times)

legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
Surprised to see some double standards for someone. I see some people got tagged for evading the ban which is the incorrect use of the feedback system. If officials do not ban them, let them live their life. Instead, DT members tagged them because they were evading the ban. This guy is evading ban as well, when timelord reported, are people showing their asses? Why do some people get tagged and some others are free for the same offense?

Fair enough questions. I wouldn't say the discrepancy in taggings are "double-standards" so much as demonstration of a "case-by-case basis".

For me personally it depends on whether I believe the users in question have honest intentions or not. It would appear that the alt of HedgeFX was banned for PM spamming. As he no longer PM spams and has been a fairly honest member of the community thusfar IMO (and not even enrolled in a sig campaign), I think in this case forgiveness is warranted.

Not that its even up to me -- its totally the mods' call as to whether he should be banned or not.

As far as tagging members for ban evasion is concerned, I would only do this if its obvious to me that they are evading a ban, although the technical proof required by mods to perform the ban doesn't exist on-forum. Usually when I mention it in a trust rating, it is in conjunction with some other offense, and not the sole basis for a tag.
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 482
Surprised to see some double standards for someone. I see some people got tagged for evading the ban which is the incorrect use of the feedback system. If officials do not ban them, let them live their life. Instead, DT members tagged them because they were evading the ban. This guy is evading ban as well, when timelord reported, are people showing their asses? Why do some people get tagged and some others are free for the same offense?
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
You started to made false accusations against me.

First instance I didn't have enough information and added the additional information when it was made available and could be verified.  The second instance I have proved you are ban evading and then you admitted knowing for the last two plus years that a previous alt is banned.

Had there been 2FA then most of the scams that have occurred wouldn't have existed. (More than likely there's be as little as 200,000 members of the forum if that were the case)

Similarly,

Quote
Timelord2067, with all due respect

The hostile reactions have been when scammers have been exposed and they squeel long and loud due to the scamming having been uncovered.

From memory, every person who has started a thread about me has then gone on to scam.

I notice you have now locked your ban evasion appeal thread (and continue to disrespect the forum by posting in other sections of the forum disregarding the BAN Appeal process - by locking your ban evasion appeal thread are you saying you know something the rest of us don't?
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 7064
What the heck?!
Some people really don't have anything better to do in their life but to accuse and spy on other members forum activity  Roll Eyes
Anyway, I won't mention this paranoid and mentally unstable member but I have him on my ignore list for a long time, like other similar members.
legendary
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1341
~
@Timelord you have not addressed the core reason of the op and you are bringing another issue again. If you want to accuse the op on ban evasion then create thread and not on the misused of the Trust System. You have not said anything about the OP. And that shows that what you did is wrong. You would have waited for the lender to act first if the borrower has not repaid the loan and not you who is a third party that didn't know the agreement plan of the two parties. What really happened that you are hunting the Op?
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 482
Yes I did uncover the ban evasion [here] and the ban evader admitted their evasion [here]

The ban evasion was also reported in this thread [here]

Let the officials decide what they want to do.
Do you have any personal issues with this user? I was reading this thread for about an hour including the reference and it seems you had problems with almost 50% of established forum users. Leave them alone as other users also suggest.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
I had to unignore a bunch of The-One-Who-Shant-Be-Named accounts to perform research for this post.

Now I'm concerned that I may be a scammer.

You were accused of being a deliberate scammer protector, that's pretty close.

Well, at least you're in good company.

You have a long list of crimes to atone for, vile vixen:

- possessing an observably dirty foxhole
- being a merit fountain for Dirty Turds
- offering vixenly services
- providing zero reasoning for your opinions
- giving merits on political grounds
- multiple reports of possible sexual deviance


Ahh... what memories

legendary
Activity: 4536
Merit: 3188
Vile Vixen and Miss Bitcointalk 2021-2023
Now I'm concerned that I may be a scammer.
Well, at least you're in good company.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
The hostile reactions have been when scammers have been exposed and they squeel long and loud due to the scamming having been uncovered.

Seems its often because people tire of being harassed by you.

From memory, every person who has started a thread about me has then gone on to scam.

Well that's not exactly true. First of all, there's this gem (I don't really understand what its in reference to but I know marlboroza retired as a non-scammer):

Timelord took money to remove support for red flag

Damn I miss marlboroza.

Then there's this one:

User: Timelord Feedback on our profile.

No trust left whatsoever for the OP. Doesn't mean they're not a scammer necessarily, but the thread is interesting because it shows how Timelord has been engaging in this kind of vindictive, stalker-ish behavior for over 6 years now... Just hounding certain accounts that he's convinced have committed wrongdoing (often despite a lack of clear evidence).

A bit more recently, although OP was banned there's no concrete evidence they were a scammer:

Wrongful accusation by Timelord. Did Yahoo put him in DT?

Perhaps my favorite quote from that thread is this one:

Perfect example of why timelord shouldn't be on DT and nobody should pay attention to his ratings.

Its almost 4 years old but it demonstrates that people don't change.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 2017
You started to made false accusations against me.
You lost DT strength for your accusations against me
You lost trust from other reputable members due to your unfair accusations against me
You made post against me and then deleted it
You made unfair trust against me and then deleted it

If you think something about me, this doesn’t mean that what you think is the truth.

Add me to your ignore list and go live your life. Stop wasting your (and mine ) time.

I don't know why you waste so much time and energy on him. You can also put him on your ignore list and that's it. I put him on it quite a while ago and haven't regretted it for a second afterwards.

What if he leaves feedback in your profile? I personally couldn't care less about untrusted feedback, and even less about neutral one.

Please lock the thread, put him on ignore and pass on him.
sr. member
Activity: 1056
Merit: 405
You started to made false accusations against me.
You lost DT strength for your accusations against me
You lost trust from other reputable members due to your unfair accusations against me
You made post against me and then deleted it
You made unfair trust against me and then deleted it

If you think something about me, this doesn’t mean that what you think is the truth.

Add me to your ignore list and go live your life. Stop wasting your (and mine ) time.


Had there been 2FA then most of the scams that have occurred wouldn't have existed. (More than likely there's be as little as 200,000 members of the forum if that were the case)

Similarly,

Quote
Timelord2067, with all due respect

The hostile reactions have been when scammers have been exposed and they squeel long and loud due to the scamming having been uncovered.

From memory, every person who has started a thread about me has then gone on to scam.
hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 800
I do not think this should linger any longer because the borrower and the lender are in touched with each others and if any feedback is left on your profile it's best advisable to send a personal message to the user who gave you feedback explained to him or her that your loan has been redeemed maybe if there are some percentage to clear off you also specify it on the message. But however haven explained it here I think he would remove it and let you be. Sometimes I can sense is very frustrating seeing a feedback that you didn't deserved being displayed on your profile or status which is very annoying.
The thing is, you did well by regularly communicating with your lender so I don't see any reason you should be tagged and part of the loan has been remitted to the lender.
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
Had there been 2FA then most of the scams that have occurred wouldn't have existed. (More than likely there's be as little as 200,000 members of the forum if that were the case)

Similarly,

Quote
Timelord2067, with all due respect

The hostile reactions have been when scammers have been exposed and they squeel long and loud due to the scamming having been uncovered.

From memory, every person who has started a thread about me has then gone on to scam.
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 4265
✿♥‿♥✿
If the user hasn't been banned yet, the moderators or admin may not think it's necessary.

In addition, the creditor did not show that there was a violation in the non-payment of the debt. Why is it necessary to demand from people what they have agreed upon among themselves? They are free not to report the consequences of the deal at all, and as long as we don't see complaints, I don't think anyone should interfere.

Timelord2067, with all due respect, why do you have these problems inciting other users to hate yourself? I never understand this. We are far from each other; why show a person strength or power at a distance? What do you want from this? There are many other things on the forum.
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
@theymos
ban evasion - no outstanding loans

Do you expect Admin to come here and investigate the case? I don't know if any of them are evading the ban. If they are doing, you can always report in another thread with the proof you have. Why do you mention theymos here? I do not think he will get notification as I believe he do not use notification bot for mention.

Yes I did uncover the ban evasion [here] and the ban evader admitted their evasion [here]

The ban evasion was also reported in this thread [here]

Sending feedback on a borrower's profile without even asking the lender,

I've had recently a user give me merit, so I contacted them - they asked me questions which I politely responded to - they then started a paranoid thread against me.

I had previously contacted the lender with my concerns about the ban evasion, they then turned around and did a second un-collaterised loan.


Is that a pinky promiceGrin
hero member
Activity: 1876
Merit: 721
Top Crypto Casino
When a lender does not take action against a borrower after a late repayment, it means that the two have contacted each other and they have privately worked out a solution. Sending feedback on a borrower's profile without even asking the lender, then it becomes a matter of overthinking about others. So leave these matters to the lender and the borrower, as they will communicate among themselves to take appropriate decisions at their convenience to continue the business.
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 538
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
@theymos

@LoyceV

ban evasion - no outstanding loans

From the loan cases defrauded by borrowers that I have seen so far on the forum how it was treated, I think the lender is usually the one that tags the borrower and gets the support of other users too, but I wonder why the tag is coming from you first @Timelord2067, mean whil,  even the lender has not raised any accusation yet against @HedgeFx for defaulting on his loan repayment. I think it's not ethical. Maybe you would have waited on @hopenotlate to see if he'd raise a tag against @HedgeFx or create a thread for his loan default. I just thought that would have been a better approach.
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 482
@theymos
ban evasion - no outstanding loans

Do you expect Admin to come here and investigate the case? I don't know if any of them are evading the ban. If they are doing, you can always report in another thread with the proof you have. Why do you mention theymos here? I do not think he will get notification as I believe he do not use notification bot for mention.
copper member
Activity: 2338
Merit: 4543
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
@Timelord2067, I agree with the other comments in this thread suggesting you leave the lender and the borrower to deal as they choose.  I also think your review is unwarranted and inappropriate.  Borrowers ask for extensions on loans all the time.  If a borrower is late, and the lender isn't complaining, then you should assume they've been in contact privately and leave their business for them to conduct.  In this case the lender seems pleased with the deals he's made with HedgeFx, so there's really no need for anyone else to get involved.

Also, I've been asked by the borrower, HedgeFx to leave DT feedback on his trust wall indicating he has an outstanding loan.  That isn't something a scammer would usually request.
Pages:
Jump to: