Topic: Answer the question above with a question. - page 334. (Read 656153 times)
What's wrong with being edgy ?
Yup I don't think it was anywhere said that the reply should end with a question mark
so anyway why are you so edgy
?
so anyway why are you so edgy
? What do you thing will happen when people know who's Nakamoto?, I'd bet he'll be a target because of his fortune
Can't you make sure that the last statement you make in this thread ends with a questionmark?no, why would he do that?
he doesn't have to do that
What do you thing will happen when people know who's Nakamoto?, I'd bet he'll be a target because of his fortune
Can't you make sure that the last statement you make in this thread ends with a questionmark?
What do you thing will happen when people know who's Nakamoto?, I'd bet he'll be a target because of his fortune
So you believe quantum mechanics or general reletavity and not god? isn't it the same
Isn't science's capacity to provide us with the ability to predict how the world around us works fundamentally different to believing in an invisible man in the sky that offers no answers we can use about the world?
what if god is a missinterpreted alien?
I did, it's too damn far-fetched and filled with bullshit but we shouldn't dismiss it's basis because of the other crap don't you think?
no I do not, do you think Satoshi Nakamoto is an alien sent from the future the put human race on the right path?
So you believe quantum mechanics or general reletavity and not god? isn't it the same
Isn't science's capacity to provide us with the ability to predict how the world around us works fundamentally different to believing in an invisible man in the sky that offers no answers we can use about the world?
what if god is a missinterpreted alien?
I did, it's too damn far-fetched and filled with bullshit but we shouldn't dismiss it's basis because of the other crap don't you think?
So you believe quantum mechanics or general reletavity and not god? isn't it the same
Isn't science's capacity to provide us with the ability to predict how the world around us works fundamentally different to believing in an invisible man in the sky that offers no answers we can use about the world?
what if god is a missinterpreted alien?
I did, it's too damn far-fetched and filled with bullshit but we shouldn't dismiss it's basis because of the other crap don't you think?
So you believe quantum mechanics or general reletavity and not god? isn't it the same
Isn't science's capacity to provide us with the ability to predict how the world around us works fundamentally different to believing in an invisible man in the sky that offers no answers we can use about the world?
what if god is a missinterpreted alien?
So you believe quantum mechanics or general reletavity and not god? isn't it the same
Isn't science's capacity to provide us with the ability to predict how the world around us works fundamentally different to believing in an invisible man in the sky that offers no answers we can use about the world?
what if god is a missinterpreted alien?
So you believe quantum mechanics or general reletavity and not god? isn't it the same
Isn't science's capacity to provide us with the ability to predict how the world around us works fundamentally different to believing in an invisible man in the sky that offers no answers we can use about the world?
Why would I trust a complete stranger?
let me answer with a counter question, why would you trust someone you know?
you did not, but that means you trust no one
do you believe God?
So you believe quantum mechanics or general reletavity and not god? isn't it the same
Why would I trust a complete stranger?
let me answer with a counter question, why would you trust someone you know?
you did not, but that means you trust no one
do you believe God?
Why would I trust a complete stranger?
let me answer with a counter question, why would you trust someone you know?
you did not, but that means you trust no one
do you believe God?
Why would I trust a complete stranger?
let me answer with a counter question, why would you trust someone you know?
Why would I trust a complete stranger?
let me answer with a counter question, why would you trust someone you know?
Why would I trust a complete stranger?
Is reality not worth discussing these days or have we moved past that need?
But penis discussions give a lot more stimulation to the human brain, don't you agree?!yes! penises are reality, we are reality, therefore we're penises, we're dicks, do you agree?
I agree that a lot of people are dicks, but not all dicks are people. Interesting, isn't it?
are you assuming animals can be dicks too?
You came to the conclusion that "not people" referred to animals rather than actual penises (who evidently aren't people)?
animals, didn't I say that in the first place?
But just exactly what is he saying?
I'm saying what I'm typing, do you trust me?
Is reality not worth discussing these days or have we moved past that need?
But penis discussions give a lot more stimulation to the human brain, don't you agree?!yes! penises are reality, we are reality, therefore we're penises, we're dicks, do you agree?
I agree that a lot of people are dicks, but not all dicks are people. Interesting, isn't it?
are you assuming animals can be dicks too?
You came to the conclusion that "not people" referred to animals rather than actual penises (who evidently aren't people)?
animals, didn't I say that in the first place?
But just exactly what is he saying?
Is reality not worth discussing these days or have we moved past that need?
But penis discussions give a lot more stimulation to the human brain, don't you agree?!yes! penises are reality, we are reality, therefore we're penises, we're dicks, do you agree?
I agree that a lot of people are dicks, but not all dicks are people. Interesting, isn't it?
are you assuming animals can be dicks too?
You came to the conclusion that "not people" referred to animals rather than actual penises (who evidently aren't people)?
animals, didn't I say that in the first place?
Jump to: