Topic: Antbleed: A remote shutdown backdoor in antminers - page 3. (Read 8124 times)

This is bitcoin, supposed to be the pinnacle of open source development, anything that resembles windows is a disaster. Collecting data, remotely shutting down mining machines and so on, shouldn't be tolerated, it shouldn't even be an option. Everyone in mining should be boycotting bitmain. If I had the money I would start a mining business that guarantees those things will never be possible because it will be hardcoded to never collect data and never take any remote orders finding a way to isolate all the stuff that doesn't need to be shared over the internet.

I know my regions of China and I know exactly what Johan does it's obvious, he turns entire villages into employees and makes them dependent on him, China has 91 ethnic minorities and most of them are extremely poor,  all he needs to do is find the villages that are close enough to cities and can either extended internet and build warehouses or bring them to cities. This means he's going to stick to most northern China just due to climate but also due to the tier ranking cities there are a lot more tier 3 cities up north if I remember correctly. (Though I think it's Guiyang that is the poorest and that's down south) This means Jihan can get entire communities dependent on him for cheap, if I an American know this there is without a doubt this if not being the case has been taken into consideration. When it comes to mining hardware in other locations anything in Europe is not even close to comparable due to their higher electric cost, their tax rates, the quality control, regulations and labor cost. It's not even comparable and silly to not be conserned, the only nations that could shift it would be more Asian countries like India but the temperature and converting their factories to more technology industry would cost more.

Just block the function by the method which OP provided and end of story, I wonder if someone could actually opens a backdoor in their backdoor and shuts down their miners?
It's just like microsoft, they have backdoors in their software, firmware in windows 10 which runs in the back ground and bypasses the user's settings.
How? while you are on metered connection it disconnects your wifi and doesn't allow you to connect until you plug the cable and then it starts to auto update and automatically removes the metered connection ticker no matter what you do it will update the windows.
But shutting down remotely? that's too much extreme.

lol now your exaggerating
it only needs maybe 5 people to run and maintain a mining farm. 2 during day 2 during night and a fifth person to cover any sickness or breaks. .. not "entire villages".

also i hav travelled to many countries and have seen how media try to make anything not western to seem like cave dwellers
EG photo's of africa of mud huts
EG photos of mongolia as temples and monks
EG photos of thailand as clear water oceans with funny shaped inhabitable land masses poking out the water.

yet the reality is different. mongolia for instance is very industrialised and has for the last few decades been developed very quickly, i hope you can see passed the idea of monasteries and monks and poor people in rice fields.
P.S i dont even donate to oxfam because i have seen how they waste funds and how the reality of africa works




the amount of internet traffic is very low for asic farms. infact the only data needed to be transmitted in is literally a couple hashes.. and a difficulty requirement. and then ~10 later a solved hash. everything else is just done locally. not over the internet
remember ASICS have no hard drives and dont need to see tx/block data. all they need is the hash. which can be handed to them remotely from stratums around the world. and then everything else is then local.



again you have not looked deep enough. iceland, north canada, georgia etc. oh and a couple other places in eastern europe/slavic regions


as for you and others screaming that im a shill or only defending X. is more narrow minded
i simply look at the big picture. and i am not pigeon holed into blindly supporting anyone.
i have no need to kiss anyone asses. in my eyes dvs are temporary. so no one should rely and depend on any particular dev. the sooner the software can support itself dynamically via user settings and then finding network consensus without dev spoon feeding. the better

one minute im being called things for supporting A, then B, then C , then D... much simpler explanation is that i simply dont support z

arguing endlessly
"this guy doesnt support Z and has been seen to not care about A means he is shil for A"
"this guy doesnt support Z and has been seen to not care about B means he is shil for B"
"this guy doesnt support Z and has been seen to not care about C means he is shil for C"
is silly. maybe because i see A, B, C as temporary drama which has been exaggerated by Z into trying to make A,B,C look bad just to pressure Z into being blindly followed. where by attacking A,B,C,D,E is simply doing the opposite of holding a
open diverse decentralised peer network.

Could it be there out of the goodness of heart to give their cloud mining clients the possibilities such as checking the status of their rented miners remotely and knowing there is actually a miner working and giving them freedom over their rented miners? but then home miners are home miners not cloud mining contractors so why the hell did they also include the code on their sale which were shipping out?

But seriously these little fuckers are worse than c-i-a and nazis lol they have total control and centralization in their back pocket.

It's not out of proportion. Roger Ver pays 30 (+X ?) people to spread his propaganda.

There are huge economic interests at stake for these people.

ya.ya.yo!

franky1 is not an expert. He is simply a paid shill. Now he is endorsing obvious fraud by Jihan Wu (Bitmain). So he seems to have criminal aspirations as well.


The probability that the Antminer backdoor was implemented without malicious intent is exactly ZERO.

ya.ya.yo!

What if I told you that you're a hypocrite? You don't have any source to back this up and I know it (yet you keep asking for sources).

He can most certainly run several farms.

He has produced 70% of the hardware.

Correct.

This is partially correct. You're overestimating. ASICBOOST can save about ~20% in energy costs. However, at current profit margins of ~1% that translates to a ~2000% increase in profits.

Any Antminer that is not behind a 'disallow by default' firewall (which is very uncommon for home miners).

I didn't say their behavior is benevolent. I said they fucked up, meaning it was stupid of them to leave this backdoor in there, although clearly their intent was not malicious. They admitted it was stupid of them and every BU supporter should acknowledge the same. This failure does not make Segwit better from the investing standpoint. Core supporters can spin this any way they like, but the fact is Segwit does not suddenly become our savior because one man on the competitor team screwed up.

From the investing standpoint BU, Segwit are too controversial changes to bring to a safe haven crypto. If Bitcoin is willing to lose its safe haven status, I am afraid it will become not relevant much sooner than if it kept the status quo.

I tend to imagine a meme whenever someone codes a convoluted means to solving a puzzle. Of course this one was an incomplete version of it so maybe it was just global for testing and forgotten but as you pointed out there are better ways to get the cogs set up.



Then there is what they teach people in school
"Commenting is the "art" of describing what your program is going to do in "high level" English statements."
(With a slight snicker to anyone that can say that with a straight face to a room of coders)
http://www.cs.utah.edu/~germain/PPS/Topics/commenting.html

But usually code just follows the easiest route which is using global vars to test it out and in this case presumes the other person can just magically use interpretation to figure what it all does. Hence Open-Source code.

"The controversy around this code has brought our attention to improve the design in order to address vulnerabilities that were pointed out by the community recently."

All in all looks like a lesson in beta-testing has occurred another good day in Development land ^^.


I can see why they would be pissed with the Chinese group for running the miners and wanted to brick them all remotely. Now it all makes sense ^^. That kill-switch is a don't tread on me flag and nuclear revenge button all in one.

(Nice find its in Cbc Beta too)

___
"In 2017, Bitmain’s own miners were withheld and sold without its consent in Canada." (Bitmain mini-note)

(Neither Bitmain nor Great North Data is doing interviews, but their lawyers both issued statements.

Daniel Simmons, the lawyer representing Great North Data, noted in an email to CBC News that the company "continues to carry on business as usual without interruption at its facilities in Labrador."

Meanwhile, Megan Taylor, who represents Bitmain, says her client "has no direct knowledge of the current status of their equipment," and Great North is no longer hosting for Bitmain.)

--
As an aside I never put together the place the Vikings visited on Discover Canada ad's and the great powerful hashing of Bitcoin but that's not a bad way to boost the economy of the New Fy's besides offshore drilling, as long as you find the right partners the wheels will keep chugging on the Bitcoin economy.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/data-storage-bitcoins-western-labrador-1.3694238

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.18770091

http://www.cbc.ca/beta/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/great-north-data-bitmain-technologies-lawsuit-1.4084925

The problem I have with this explanation is that the way the kill switch was implemented is way more complex and convoluted than it needs to be. It sounds like what they had done was fully implemented the feature but not the rest of the service they were going to provide, but they implemented this feature in such a weird way. The phone home code sets a global variable which is then read by another completely unrelated thread which sets another global variable which is what then actually does the mining shutdown part when the machine requests work. That is just way more complicated than it needs to be. The full feature could have just been implemented in the same function that they wrote for the phoning home, but instead it sets global variables used by other functions and threads.

Reading the patch thread the remote kill is needed if someone confiscates the mining units or steals em.
Seems a bit overkill though but in the name of coin security someone would appreciate the feature and phone home does the job.

We will continue the development of this feature to provide a technical protection for mining rig owners to host their miners in remote locations. We will add a switch to this feature, and this switch will be closed by default.

As long as someone bothers to read the code the feature sounds decent enough sum up steal my miner I brick it lol, kind of sounds like a douche thing a reseller could do to someone depending on how it is used though.

Looks like your shouting racism to avoid discussion, if you think the fact that Bitmain is Chinese isn't relevant you're crazy.

No you're not paranoid, Jihan is.

Fact. They stalled shipping of L3+'s for a month plus due to 'firmware problem'. They really used them to mine themselves and stalled the units to paid customers to use them to stop seq witness till consensus. A nice payday. Run diff up by 33% to boot. The April 15th folk are getting units now with Jan dated firmware on them, so that surely was a lie now.



An added benifit is this patch will get rid of the nasty Jan date on the firmware to boot.

Bitmain. Evil pays. (tm bitmain)

I'm not an expert like franky1 or Lauda, but it certainly sounds serious to me.  It sounds like a "doom switch" for sure.  But, I think that its revelation will have foiled the plot if there was a plot at all. So, I think it's not so big of a deal now that it has been exposed. It sure is an intriguing situation though.

Only someone with a paid agenda or a recent brainosuction would ignore these simple facts:

1. BU miners have already threatened to attack and destroy the non-BU chain after a split, this is documented
2. BU miners under Bitmain lead, have ASICBOOST, so they can invoke a 30% gain at any given time, on their own miners
3. Now Antbleed has been revealed; a method that, until 48 hours ago, could have been used to destroy everyone elses Antminer on the planet at their discretion

There is no certainty, but there is certainly a possibility, to combine 2+3, to achieve 1, which would be the destruction of the alternative chain, at least a temporary disruption, that could be the edge required to turn their BU chain into the winner.

Am I paranoid again?  

Jihan Wu is the final boss to open the gate to the moon guys