archived. - page 77. | Bitcointalksearch.org

Sozialtourist

full member

Activity: 686

Merit: 101

Quote from: Darkoth89 on May 17, 2018, 04:17:23 AM

Quote from: Owillz on May 16, 2018, 12:12:24 PM

Quote from: Anilbg on May 16, 2018, 01:18:28 AM

Quote from: Sozialtourist on May 15, 2018, 11:07:23 AM

Quote from: FarmFrenzy on May 15, 2018, 10:19:29 AM

Quote from: Ace44 on May 15, 2018, 06:15:03 AM

Quote from: CryptoBeefy on May 14, 2018, 03:11:28 PM

Quote from: alexberezov on May 14, 2018, 12:12:27 AM

is there any chance of being on major exchanges such as Bittrex? and how much tokens already raised?

I'm sure the team have ambitions on this like most projects no doubt do but it's likely at the start that they wont. These bigger exchanges charge an absolute fortune and it's just not practical for most.

You are right, most times is even best to start from a smaller platform and move to the bigger ones, reason that it has a kind of influence when a project move from small to big, the community will understand that they are serious but that aside, i usually say that big exchanges can't help a bad project, a project with a difference will stand out, no matter the avenue they choose as an exchange

I think the best approach is to use some not so famous exchanges at first time. Trading should begin from small volumes. And then when everybody is sure about reliability of token they can move to bigger exchanges.

It's most of the time also a question of the money a project wants to spend. Do they decide to spend a huge sum of the money they just raised to get listed on a major exchange to please all the 'moon-kiddies' or do they decide to go for smaller, cheaper exchanges, build up some trading volume there and increase the community so that maybe the community can help to get listed on Binance and co. by voting for example.

I think cross exchange at start is fine. But not all people like to have multiple exchange account for trading. So I personally feel that Bittwatt should list at one popular exchange.

In cases like this, I believe the best method to use is to create a poll for community members to vote and then the listing can be done according to the top voted exchanges in a descending other

I don't think it's for the community to decide what exchange it's on. The team are the ones going to be paying the fees (And the top exchanges charge upto $1mill..) id rather the funds went towards development of the project.

This is my opinion, too. Why spending million(s) on an exchange listing when you could use this money to bring the project forward and there are also much cheaper exchanges.

Gunny95

member

Activity: 252

Merit: 11

Quote from: junder on May 17, 2018, 04:33:29 AM

Quote from: Nathan01 on May 17, 2018, 02:47:06 AM

Quote from: Anilbg on May 17, 2018, 01:30:26 AM

Quote from: FarmFrenzy on May 16, 2018, 09:36:42 AM

Quote from: phantam on May 16, 2018, 07:51:18 AM

Quote from: Nathan01 on May 16, 2018, 04:53:03 AM

Burning of unsold token is definitely a good step to increasing the value of the project, cutting circulation is super solid plan and I look forward to seeing it work

This is always the case, reducing the available supply, is always a positive return for the project, it also has better trust by cutting the idle assets from the chain reassures customers that unsold tokens don't get used for other things down the line. Thats why theirs always a push for ICO's to confirm they will burn tokens before the exchange listings

In fact this process is pretty natural. Total supply of the project is the money people spent during ICO. If there are tokens that haven't been sold then these tokens cost nothing. So they must be burned not to dump the price of the remaining.

Do you guys really think there will be unsold bittwatt tokens? I think all tokens will be sold soon and we don't have to worry about it.

with 9 days left and the status bar almost closing i don't think there would be any token available for burning however i can't find information on total supply and intending circulating supply, kindly help out thank you

If no token is available for burning. it's mean the hardcap is reached. right?
this project is good enough. Many of people are interested to join of the project.

If there are any unsold tokens and the project has stated that unsold tokens will be burned, yes it means there are no unsold tokens if hard-cap is reached, which is in itself a nice achievement

junder

hero member

Activity: 1092

Merit: 507

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: Nathan01 on May 17, 2018, 02:47:06 AM

Quote from: Anilbg on May 17, 2018, 01:30:26 AM

Quote from: FarmFrenzy on May 16, 2018, 09:36:42 AM

Quote from: phantam on May 16, 2018, 07:51:18 AM

Quote from: Nathan01 on May 16, 2018, 04:53:03 AM

Burning of unsold token is definitely a good step to increasing the value of the project, cutting circulation is super solid plan and I look forward to seeing it work

This is always the case, reducing the available supply, is always a positive return for the project, it also has better trust by cutting the idle assets from the chain reassures customers that unsold tokens don't get used for other things down the line. Thats why theirs always a push for ICO's to confirm they will burn tokens before the exchange listings

In fact this process is pretty natural. Total supply of the project is the money people spent during ICO. If there are tokens that haven't been sold then these tokens cost nothing. So they must be burned not to dump the price of the remaining.

Do you guys really think there will be unsold bittwatt tokens? I think all tokens will be sold soon and we don't have to worry about it.

with 9 days left and the status bar almost closing i don't think there would be any token available for burning however i can't find information on total supply and intending circulating supply, kindly help out thank you

If no token is available for burning. it's mean the hardcap is reached. right?
this project is good enough. Many of people are interested to join of the project.

em777

jr. member

Activity: 574

Merit: 1

when you are fed up transfer your crypto to me

Quote from: Ace44 on May 17, 2018, 12:53:42 AM

Quote from: Darkoth89 on May 16, 2018, 04:46:02 PM

Quote from: Sozialtourist on May 16, 2018, 03:14:19 PM

Quote from: Gunny95 on May 16, 2018, 03:02:50 PM

Quote from: FarmFrenzy on May 16, 2018, 02:34:36 PM

I found an interesting article on coindesk. It tells how it all started) Just an interesting fact: the first case of energy transfer with the help of the blockchain was recorded in 2016, when one Brooklyn resident sold surplus renewable energy to his neighbor with the help of Ethereum smart-contract.

Ethereum Used for 'First' Paid Energy Trade Using Blockchain Tech

Thanks for sharing this article, I like how this shed light into why blockchain is useful for energy related applications

Very interesting. This just shows what all can change over the course of 2 years. 2016 we had the first energy transfer with the help of blockchain, 2018 we have projects like Bittwatt that focus on a new kind of energy market. What will be 2020?! Really interesting times we live in.

lol that's pretty cool, thanks for sharing that article! And yeah, the future is certainly going to be interesting, the next 5-10 years I think we're going to see insane advancements in blockchain.

Yes, the blockchain industry is already getting ready to transform the world, it will be wise for one to be part of it this moment before it goes grows to a phenomenal level because the advance technology that's coming with it is pretty massive, every brand is trying to understand and embrace this technology

yeah. its advisable to be part of blockchain techy now, because it growing rapidly. it happened with ICT in the late 1980s the guys that venture into it then, were handsomely rewarded. so we should all roll with the current tide.

Darkoth89

hero member

Activity: 1274

Merit: 646