Pages:
Author

Topic: Are BanxShares as good as GAW Paycoin? - page 18. (Read 47093 times)

legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
October 14, 2015, 01:21:02 PM
I wish all respectables CEOs got onto forums to argue with people and call them idiots instead of you know, using a PR firm and writing press releases to counter FUD.

I've only even known about Banx for 3 days and already I see the writing on the wall to stay away from this.
sr. member
Activity: 455
Merit: 250
October 14, 2015, 01:20:51 PM

ALL ICO's currently still going on no longer have a market cap on CMC. Still on CMC actually, just don't have a market cap >> http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/banxshares/

We will be listed on the assetts section of CMC when we move to BTS network.

In the mean time feel free to check out http://CapFeed.com
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1010
Join The Blockchain Revolution In Logistics
October 14, 2015, 01:16:49 PM
BanxShares pulled from http://coinmarketcap.com/all/views/all/ ?
sr. member
Activity: 518
Merit: 250
October 14, 2015, 01:11:14 PM
You know, when you put it like that, I suppose you're right.

I apologize for any harm I've caused you. 

I wish the best for you and your investors.

I wish I believed you I really do.


Here now, are you suggesting that I am dishonest in some way? 

Don't you know about Karma, and how saying things like that on the internet is wrong?
sr. member
Activity: 455
Merit: 250
October 14, 2015, 01:09:27 PM
You know, when you put it like that, I suppose you're right.

I apologize for any harm I've caused you. 

I wish the best for you and your investors.

I wish I believed you I really do.
sr. member
Activity: 518
Merit: 250
October 14, 2015, 01:07:46 PM
You know, when you put it like that, I suppose you're right.

I apologize for any harm I've caused you. 

I wish the best for you and your investors.
sr. member
Activity: 455
Merit: 250
October 14, 2015, 01:05:20 PM
I believe you are the one trying to inflict harm on me and mine. You really have a warped sense of interpretation.

I believe Im a guy that tries his best and others may not like me for what ever reasons they want to invent in their tiny heads.

People got their contracts but they were not going to be profitable enough long term. we have already proven we had mining equipment, whats your issue?

So you do have a moral issue with porno, just not being a troll?

I will teach the masses what I think true, and no I don't think Bitcoin will ever be mainstream in stores.

You play around with you two bit new next shiny alt coin and I wll teach people who want to learn and grow my business ehh.

Are you at any point going to stop this crap or just waste your time forever?

whats the end game here Stuart?

sr. member
Activity: 518
Merit: 250
October 14, 2015, 12:51:49 PM
@Runpaint - No I dont beleive in god, just karma.


So you believe that I should be punished for doing anything you don't like, since you see yourself as the Highest Power in your own universe.  In other words, you think you are God and feel no remorse for any harm you inflict upon others.  



Quote
We offered people banx instead of their mining contracts


GAW offered people Hashcoins instead of their mining contracts.  What is the difference between GAW and Banx?




Quote
No one has ever said our mining contracts were fake.


If they were real long-term mining contracts, you would still honour your side of the contract.  As it turns out, those people who signed up for your mining contract did not get what the contract said.  Is there some definition of "fake" - other than the standard definition - that doesn't apply to your contracts?





Quote
I have no moral issue with pornography


I have no moral issue with talking on message boards and speaking out when something looks wrong.





Quote
You keep playing around with your shitty alt coins and I will push on building my, my friends, investors and clients vision.


But that's not really what you do, is it?  You charge people money to "teach" them things such as "You'll never be able to spend bit coins in a store."
sr. member
Activity: 455
Merit: 250
October 14, 2015, 12:50:50 PM
You don't have to believe me. Its right there, in your boss's own words.

there is no way we ever planned to move to BTS on the day of launch of 2.0 .

Quote from: 'Mark Lyford in a Press Release'
As a result of some pretty aggressive negotiations, both BanxShares and Banx.io will upgrade simultaneously when BitShares 2.0 launches this summer. I consider that a bit of a personal coup.


Attack my personal character all you want. Doesn't change what Mark Lyford just said.
This is getting pretty tiring.
To anyone reasonable, that clearly reads that WHEN they move to Bitshares, both BanxShares AND Banx.io will move SIMULTANEOUSLY,
and NOT at the exact same time BTS2.0 launches, which would be ridiculous.

Those of us invested in Banx were both aware of this, and would also expect nothing less.

I've never read so much playground bickering with so much one sided out of context rhetoric.

So, how do you explain the fact that CCEDK did move with Open Ledger onto Graphene on the day of its launch ?
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,18973.msg244189.html#msg244189

What stopped you guys from joining them ? Have you done anything with Open Ledger testing for Banx.io ?

And you know what would change everyones minds immediately ?
Post some real information, not just empty rhetoric. Accounts, trading data, proof of BTC deposits...anything.
A real business will have this information at their fingertips, ready to go.
The fact that Banx can't provide any real information makes your counter-arguments completely meaningless.

I will move to BTS 2.0 when I decide. My investors and Banx holders are fully aware of our plans.

I said we will move, like I said I never said we will move on day one.  CCEDK was built to launch on the platform from day one. Our infrastructure  is not.
sr. member
Activity: 455
Merit: 250
October 14, 2015, 12:47:51 PM
I would like to say how grateful I am to everyone who has supported me during these times of trolls and false journalists doing their best to do me down.

The thing is, after everything I have experienced in my life that will never happen..  

Thanks again to everyone who has supported me, it is much appreciated.

hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 1001
October 14, 2015, 12:46:36 PM
You don't have to believe me. Its right there, in your boss's own words.

there is no way we ever planned to move to BTS on the day of launch of 2.0 .

Quote from: 'Mark Lyford in a Press Release'
As a result of some pretty aggressive negotiations, both BanxShares and Banx.io will upgrade simultaneously when BitShares 2.0 launches this summer. I consider that a bit of a personal coup.


Attack my personal character all you want. Doesn't change what Mark Lyford just said.
This is getting pretty tiring.
To anyone reasonable, that clearly reads that WHEN they move to Bitshares, both BanxShares AND Banx.io will move SIMULTANEOUSLY,
and NOT at the exact same time BTS2.0 launches, which would be ridiculous.

Those of us invested in Banx were both aware of this, and would also expect nothing less.

I've never read so much playground bickering with so much one sided out of context rhetoric.

So, how do you explain the fact that CCEDK did move with Open Ledger onto Graphene on the day of its launch ?
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,18973.msg244189.html#msg244189

What stopped you guys from joining them ? Have you done anything with Open Ledger testing for Banx.io ?

And you know what would change everyones minds immediately ?
Post some real information, not just empty rhetoric. Accounts, trading data, proof of BTC deposits...anything.
A real business will have this information at their fingertips, ready to go.
The fact that Banx can't provide any real information makes your counter-arguments completely meaningless.
sr. member
Activity: 455
Merit: 250
October 14, 2015, 12:42:07 PM
@Runpaint - No I dont beleive in god, just karma. We offered people banx instead of their mining contracts , because we actually care about our customers. It has already been proven we were mining as we said. No one has ever said our mining contracts were fake.

There is a reason I gave up talking to you and trying to reason with you. I have just been reminded of it. Nothing I say or do will change your warped mind and your friends minds. I sure hope the donation to DeMartino was worth it.

I have no moral issue with pornography, im sorry you appear to . I have never dealt drugs in my life only ever grown plants FYI

You keep playing around with your shitty alt coins and I will push on building my, my friends, investors and clients vision.

sr. member
Activity: 518
Merit: 250
October 14, 2015, 11:41:02 AM
@Ian you stated:

"Yeah no problem. Take all the time you need.



Did you think he was talking about moving Banx to BTS2.0?

You are a real idiot my man. You have already shown yourself up through out this thread. keep going.... Karma is a bitch..



Karma?  You mean God will punish me for my sins? 

When Josh Garza sold fake cloud mining contracts and then pushed customers to take worthless Paycoins instead, do you think Karma punished him with the disaster that has become his life?  Or is that merely the inevitable outcome of all Ponzi schemes?

Since you appear to be doing the exact same things which Josh Garza has already done, how do you think you will avoid the same outcome?

If Karma punishes me for telling the truth about bad investments, what will Karma do to someone who has spent his life dealing in pornography, drugs, gambling, and questionable marketing practices?
sr. member
Activity: 455
Merit: 250
October 14, 2015, 11:23:47 AM
@Ian you stated:

"Yeah no problem. Take all the time you need.



Did you think he was talking about moving Banx to BTS2.0?

You are a real idiot my man. You have already shown yourself up through out this thread. keep going.... Karma is a bitch..
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
October 14, 2015, 11:18:27 AM
@cryptojerk i love you aswell man  Kiss are you on tinder bro?
sr. member
Activity: 518
Merit: 250
October 14, 2015, 11:16:15 AM
@Ian you stated:

"Yeah no problem. Take all the time you need.



Did you think he was talking about moving Banx to BTS2.0?
sr. member
Activity: 455
Merit: 250
October 14, 2015, 10:51:59 AM
@Ian you stated:

"Yeah no problem. Take all the time you need.

Well, since you actually showed me something I can delay it a bit, or it could not come out at all, or it could, like I said, be an article exonerating you. It all just depends. I'm still confused about a few things but I'm at least convinced you have income and that's pretty significant."

^^ How do you explain that ? Based on what I showed you , you even considered it could 'not come out' ? not very objective that is it?
sr. member
Activity: 455
Merit: 250
October 14, 2015, 10:38:06 AM
This is getting pretty tiring.
To anyone reasonable, that clearly reads that WHEN they move to Bitshares, both BanxShares AND Banx.io will move SIMULTANEOUSLY,
and NOT at the exact same time BTS2.0 launches, which would be ridiculous.

how does "both BanxShares and Banx.io will upgrade simultaneously when BitShares 2.0 launches this summer." equal NOT simultaneously and not this summer?

Quote
Those of us invested in Banx were both aware of this, and would also expect nothing less.

It is actually really encouraging to me that the pool of actual banx investors is so small, that you know exactly what they are all thinking.

I have NEVER stated we will move to BTS THE DAY it launches. NEVER... I have stated we will move when it launches however.

Ian, to be banging on about us not moving on the day it launches demonstrates how little you know about business. But then again you don't run a business you run a charity site that accepts bitcoin donations to write shit about people and even after all the information you were given which you admitted you were happy with (and that now the article may not go out, which is not very objective in itself is it) you still spun it to how the people who 'donated' to you wanted it to read.

I will be preparing my official response to your BS as soon as I can showing how your 'article' was only going to be written one way no matter what.
full member
Activity: 236
Merit: 100
October 14, 2015, 10:34:37 AM


This is getting pretty tiring.
To anyone reasonable, that clearly reads that WHEN they move to Bitshares, both BanxShares AND Banx.io will move SIMULTANEOUSLY,
and NOT at the exact same time BTS2.0 launches, which would be ridiculous.

how does "both BanxShares and Banx.io will upgrade simultaneously when BitShares 2.0 launches this summer." equal NOT simultaneously and not this summer?

Quote
Those of us invested in Banx were both aware of this, and would also expect nothing less.

It is actually really encouraging to me that the pool of actual banx investors is so small, that you know exactly what they are all thinking.

edit, I love you timmy, don't ever change. thanks for the lolz
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
October 14, 2015, 10:26:14 AM
Think we have another who cannot read here. Which is bad for an article writer who supposed to have an unbiased opinion.

1. Bts didnt launch in summer did it (october is autum)
2. Simetaniously means together so both banx shares and banx.io will move together as in at the same time. No where does it say exactly when bts 2.0 launches.

Its shit like this that discredits anything you write ian.  And thats not an attack ian im just educating you
Pages:
Jump to: