sorry for resurrecting this thread, but is there any reason, why somebody like me (not a signature whore, just interested in bitcoin) should still visiting this board?
I just checked couple of threads and I really don't know if it is just my view, but is seems now, that MAJORITY of threads/posts are created on purpose for hunting posts and posting non-sense. so...what now?
Topic: Are Bitcoiners dumber / greedier than ordinary people? (Read 3496 times)
Top topics in this sub:
Explain this shit.
Explain this shit.
Bitcoiners are more than the other subs, so you'll find good people and bad people in here.
My feeling is that Bitcoiners are a bit greedier than ordinary people.
But your image is irrelevant. With the huge amount of account farming around us, pointless threads pop up at an alarming rate. You just caught a good bunch of them.
In my opinion, Bitcoiners are smarter than ordinary people coz they are involved in such activities like gambling, betting, trading which makes them to use our mind.
Hey buddy.. FUCK YOU
and who says the internet has to be a polite Tea-Party ?
Fuck your rudeness LOL
Man up and don't be a little pussy whipped PC SJW douche.
and who says the internet has to be a polite Tea-Party ?
Fuck your rudeness LOL
Man up and don't be a little pussy whipped PC SJW douche.
I don't wanna say something about this. But apparently this post has made me believe that some bitcoiners are dumber than ordinary people.
-snipe-
Except from his foul language, most of his posts are offensive and/or nonsense. You guys need not to argue with ZyclonRacerX anymore as he is banned now.
Link here
I just saw the thread though. Just wanna inform you guys who were offended by ZyclonRacerX
I wasn't offended. I am more offended by the lack of intelligent discussion here. (on bct in general)
I was following that linked thread, it was very informative, including mod input, but now it is deleted?
I commented on spam recently. No reply, no action, no interest.
(was this thread moved from discussion? should it be in meta, it's actually more about the moderation?)
Hilarious?
Seems like they've deleted it. It's better that way though. Zyclon is one of the proofs that some bitcoiners are rude and in need of proper education.
Hey buddy.. FUCK YOU
and who says the internet has to be a polite Tea-Party ?
Fuck your rudeness LOL
Man up and don't be a little pussy whipped PC SJW douche.
-snipe-
Except from his foul language, most of his posts are offensive and/or nonsense. You guys need not to argue with ZyclonRacerX anymore as he is banned now.
Link here
I just saw the thread though. Just wanna inform you guys who were offended by ZyclonRacerX
I wasn't offended. I am more offended by the lack of intelligent discussion here. (on bct in general)
I was following that linked thread, it was very informative, including mod input, but now it is deleted?
I commented on spam recently. No reply, no action, no interest.
(was this thread moved from discussion? should it be in meta, it's actually more about the moderation?)
Hilarious?
Seems like they've deleted it. It's better that way though. Zyclon is one of the proofs that some bitcoiners are rude and in need of proper education.
-snipe-
Except from his foul language, most of his posts are offensive and/or nonsense. You guys need not to argue with ZyclonRacerX anymore as he is banned now.
Link here
I just saw the thread though. Just wanna inform you guys who were offended by ZyclonRacerX
I wasn't offended. I am more offended by the lack of intelligent discussion here. (on bct in general)
I was following that linked thread, it was very informative, including mod input, but now it is deleted?
I commented on spam recently. No reply, no action, no interest.
(was this thread moved from discussion? should it be in meta, it's actually more about the moderation?)
Hilarious?
Dude are you simply trolling or are there any point you trying to make with this thread. Bitcoin people are no more greedier than the average Joe and they are on average more
intelligent than the ordinary Joe. For someone to grasp the concept and to talk about Bitcoin on a public forum are already a step up from the average fiat public. You have to
explain in more detail, why you saying.. what you said in your post... to quantify that statement.
intelligent than the ordinary Joe. For someone to grasp the concept and to talk about Bitcoin on a public forum are already a step up from the average fiat public. You have to
explain in more detail, why you saying.. what you said in your post... to quantify that statement.
Case in point. Look at what you typed up there. An average 5-year-old has better grasp of grammar, sentence structure & formatting skillz.
Nice the grammar of the peoples topic titles?
I often see some sad ass pathetic Broken Engrish topic titles.
@OP
Fuck yeah they are greedy fucking retards.
They just don't want to admit it.
And their defense is.. "grammar"
Typical retort usually by little children still in school.
Yes they are.
I did notify the "authorities" of course.
Keep up the good work, Tiger
~ undroolia scratches ass behind ear, ass brays in unabashed ecstasy ~Just another troll in this forum who does not contribute anything at all. He will only create another account if this one gets banned.
You never got to be a hall monitor, did you? I suggest you notify the proper authorities immediately, there's no time to lose!
I did notify the "authorities" of course. This desperate need for attention is why you created the account, isn't it? I'm happy to help the less fortunate among us.
... words ...
And this needed to be posted from a sockpuppet account because... Sistine Chapel?
Because it's difficult to post from banned accounts?
Because it takes no time to create an account, Anon?
Because having shitloads of sock accounts is what makes this shithole what it is?
I dunno.
>... words ...
It's a forum, you ass. What did you expect, a tuggy?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/unofficial-list-of-official-bitcointalkorg-rules-guidelines-faq-703657
Quote
25. If you get banned (temporary or permanently) and create a new account to continue posting / sending PMs, it's considered ban evasion. The only exception is creating a thread in Meta about your ban.
... words ...
And this needed to be posted from a sockpuppet account because... Sistine Chapel?
There's a ton of smart people out there that may appear as idiots because they don't speak proper english. I know a guy that is a math and coding wizard but he is russian and when he writes an email he looks exactly like those guys with terrible grammar.
Nah, stupid is stupid, don't blame it on language/cultural differences. If the content worthwhile/interesting, no one would complain about shit grammar. My problem's with idiotic, insipid tripe getting repeated, ad nauseum, in mispunctuated broken fkn English.
I understand your complains, but sometimes even those people are smarter than you think. In any case, can't blame people in places like indonesia or something trying to make some money off sig campaigns. Im glad if Bitcoin is helping them financially, who cares, just ignore the posts tbh.
-snipe-
Except from his foul language, most of his posts are offensive and/or nonsense. You guys need not to argue with ZyclonRacerX anymore as he is banned now.
Link here
I just saw the thread though. Just wanna inform you guys who were offended by ZyclonRacerX
people are as dump as the OP creator [...]
*dumb.
DUMB, you illiterate cumwad
You consider all signature campaign participants as shit posters, but allow drivel like this to be posted? How is this in any way or form constructive? Is this a crusade to crucify signature posters and an attempt to divide people on this forum?
I joined this signature campaign, because I support Bitcoin anonymity and this service is one method to accomplish those goals. The payment I receive to accomplish this, is a added bonus.
Signature posters add a lot of value in the form of traffic and content creation for this forum. The campaign managers are responsible to manage this in a responsible manner and signature participants should adhere to the rules. If a participant in these campaigns become a nuisance or a annoyance, and they are deemed to be a Sig spammer, some actions must be taken to deal with this.
This should also be applicable to all other members, not participating in these signature campaigns. Not wearing a paid signature, should not give you a free pass to post drivel and to insult other members.
Before you flame me for this post, consider this : Anything I post in the Meta section, do not qualify for payment as stipulated by the signature campaign rules.
1. I do not "consider all signature campaign participants as shit posters." Nothing I've said should have led you to think otherwise.
2. Bitcoin mixers aid Bitcoin anonymity like ordinary money laundering schemes aids fiat anonymity.
3. Yes, "signature posters" do "add a lot of value in the form of traffic and content creation for this forum." As would Viagra, porn site spammers & the rest of "valuable" traffic website operators typically pay to avoid.
In other words, the added value is collectively best described as "fucking spam" and, as such, is overwhelmingly negative.
4. "Not wearing a paid signature" does not give me "a free pass to post drivel and to insult other members."
Though it does give me is a right to respond to an illiterate, incoherent douche trying to insult me in broken English. It also gives me "a free pass" to use said account-farming douche to illustrate my point.
5. Your not getting paid to argue for your right to spam this forum [with signature ads] & get paid is curiously meta. Touche!
did you know? so many people who don't wear a signature feel like they're the boss,accusing people doing a shit post even their post aren't even better than the person they're accusing,otherwise i know people who really kind and don't wear a signature attributes
what i meant here is that ,people start dumping new threads in order to spam ,since he was mentioning ordinary people as greedy and dumb.i was adding what ordinary people can do as the OP creator.
I don't think that this is the case with OP as he: 1) Isn't part of a signature campaign (no incentive to post); 2) Has not made that many posts in his own thread.@Lauda,hope you are a Niki Lauda fan 
so am i
No, I'm not. I was not even aware of that person until recently. so am i You consider all signature campaign participants as shit posters, but allow drivel like this to be posted? How is this in any way or form constructive?
It isn't constructive. Essentially even though 'insults' are technically allowed, they get removed if the post does not add anything to the discussion.Is this a crusade to crucify signature posters and an attempt to divide people on this forum?
No, but they deserve it.I joined this signature campaign, because I support Bitcoin anonymity and this service is one method to accomplish those goals. The payment I receive to accomplish this, is a added bonus.
The payment does not help you accomplish goals, don't justify it (+ Bitcoin isn't anonymous). Anyone who sees their signature campaign as anything other than a bonus for their usual posting is most likely a participant for the wrong reasons. people are as dump as the OP creator [...]
*dumb.
DUMB, you illiterate cumwad
You consider all signature campaign participants as shit posters, but allow drivel like this to be posted? How is this in any way or form constructive? Is this a crusade to crucify signature posters and an attempt to divide people on this forum?
I joined this signature campaign, because I support Bitcoin anonymity and this service is one method to accomplish those goals. The payment I receive to accomplish this, is a added bonus.
Signature posters add a lot of value in the form of traffic and content creation for this forum. The campaign managers are responsible to manage this in a responsible manner and signature participants should adhere to the rules. If a participant in these campaigns become a nuisance or a annoyance, and they are deemed to be a Sig spammer, some actions must be taken to deal with this.
This should also be applicable to all other members, not participating in these signature campaigns. Not wearing a paid signature, should not give you a free pass to post drivel and to insult other members.
Before you flame me for this post, consider this : Anything I post in the Meta section, do not qualify for payment as stipulated by the signature campaign rules.
With that being said, there's also probably a lot of 'great' posters that would probably eventually leave too or the amount of time they spend here would decrease significantly over time. I'm all for trying to improve the post quality and discussions but at the same time a dead forum would also be pretty boring.It's just gonna be be a shame to all the quality posters though who just appreciate being able to get a little bitcoin for something they would do anyway and unfortunately it's gonna be the shitters that spoil it for everyone else.
If you find this very important and want to consider it, then the 'solution' needs to be something that does not completely remove signature campaigns. Making it significantly harder to spam (by some means) would be much better than doing nothing.people are as dump as the OP creator , why would you think that bitcoiners and ordinary people are different people. i have seen many people like you in this forum 
*dumb.
DUMB, you illiterate cumwad
Let's not start insulting each other directly as this will not help anyone.DUMB, you illiterate cumwad
what i meant here is that ,people start dumping new threads in order to spam ,since he was mentioning ordinary people as greedy and dumb.i was adding what ordinary people can do as the OP creator.
and for @ZyclonRacerX ,i didnt know that you created oxford university you dumber.
@Lauda,hope you are a Niki Lauda fan
so am i Jump to: