Are IEO's bad? - page 4. | Bitcointalksearch.org

Shallow

sr. member

Activity: 938

Merit: 255

SmartFi - EARN, LEND & TRADE

Quote from: MadGamer on April 30, 2019, 10:45:10 AM

My understanding for IEOs is basically instead of project handling raising funds etc. It will be for an exchange to do so.

An IEO hosted by Yobit or Binance can clearly not be compared. In other words, the exchange gives more credibility to the project regardless of whether it's worth it or not.

Am I the only one who thinks this is actually a bad thing and make people focus on the exchange hosting rather than the actual project and what the team is offering etc.?

You are right, people are after the profit to be made thus focusing on the exchange hosting the IEO than on the actual project. The end result of this is; first the exchange, in this case major exchanges gains more popularity as well as making more money, in the long run attracting more IEOs. Secondly, the project whether good or bad ends up having a successful IEO, if it's a bad project, investors will lament but have no one to hold accountable while giving more negativity to the nature of IEO. However, by rating most IEOs now, it is evident that majority aren't living up to expectations because as soon as profit is made, investors moves to the next; but if it's a good one, they will stick around.

Coltpython

member

Activity: 700

Merit: 11

IEOs have their good side and their bad sides. The good side is that project owners can't find it easy to scam investors because they will be subject to checks before their project is listed on an exchange. The bad side is that some investors will prefer to buy an ieo based on the prestige of an exchange than the viability of a project.

Mahanton

hero member

Activity: 2730

Merit: 632

Quote from: Vishnu.Reang on September 17, 2019, 01:04:25 PM

Quote from: kidbounty on September 17, 2019, 12:41:01 PM

IEO is not bad, it's just that there are too many exchanges that make lunchpad. so investors are confused about which exchange they want to use. especially now that new projects prefer IEO, to collect development funds rather than ICO. too many exchanges and new projects. this is the problem now, because only IEO in the large exchange has a chance of success.

If you want to go for the larger exchanges, then be ready to pay huge amounts as listing fee. Exchanges such as Binance and Huobi are asking insane amounts as listing fees. From what I have heard, Huobi is charging a few million USD per listing and the fee charged by Binance is in the same range. And the promoters will be losing this amount if the fundraising ends in failure.

Binance doesn't require any listing fees but rather they do choose up the coin according on a strict criteria
https://www.binance.com/en/support/articles/115000822512
Listing out on big and top exchangers wont really be that easy- if you were not able to pay up millions then you do need for your coins to be worthy to get listed.

Quote from: nicecrypto on September 17, 2019, 03:02:31 PM

Ieo are not bad at all, intact it is much safer way to invest in a project than ico imo, with ieo you are sure your investment is protected and a guaranteed exchange for trading, unlike some ico that you stand the chance to lose your money if the team decided to be greedy, also can take a very long time before listing on an exchange.

This is the main reason or difference between IEO and ICO that's why majority of investors would see IEO is more better yet exchange listing do directly happens.

nicecrypto

member

Activity: 1260

Merit: 21

Ieo are not bad at all, intact it is much safer way to invest in a project than ico imo, with ieo you are sure your investment is protected and a guaranteed exchange for trading, unlike some ico that you stand the chance to lose your money if the team decided to be greedy, also can take a very long time before listing on an exchange.

MMA Rats

member

Activity: 509

Merit: 10

IEO is not bad, but recently IEO projects have been making less and less profit, but so far it makes sense to do them

Vishnu.Reang

sr. member

Activity: 1988

Merit: 453

Quote from: kidbounty on September 17, 2019, 12:41:01 PM

IEO is not bad, it's just that there are too many exchanges that make lunchpad. so investors are confused about which exchange they want to use. especially now that new projects prefer IEO, to collect development funds rather than ICO. too many exchanges and new projects. this is the problem now, because only IEO in the large exchange has a chance of success.

If you want to go for the larger exchanges, then be ready to pay huge amounts as listing fee. Exchanges such as Binance and Huobi are asking insane amounts as listing fees. From what I have heard, Huobi is charging a few million USD per listing and the fee charged by Binance is in the same range. And the promoters will be losing this amount if the fundraising ends in failure.

Zdraste16

member

Activity: 442

Merit: 11

Both ICOs and IEOs can make a profit and also result in a loss. IEO has a difference in that the project is initially monitored by the exchange to which the IEO project token goes. Exchanges like BINANCE are most likely to value their reputation and will not conduct IEO dubious projects. Regarding the ICO, the situation is a little different, you need to do the study of the project yourself, since the probability of the success of the project or not worth contacting depends on it.

tonyja2017

member

Activity: 532

Merit: 10

Both the ICO and the IEO operate in the same way. But IEO is considered an upgrade of the ICO when the ICO is gradually dying in the market because there are so many scammer. IEO will protect all benefits for you if you have any doubts about that.

kidbounty

full member

Activity: 1064

Merit: 101

HELENA

IEO is not bad, it's just that there are too many exchanges that make lunchpad. so investors are confused about which exchange they want to use. especially now that new projects prefer IEO, to collect development funds rather than ICO. too many exchanges and new projects. this is the problem now, because only IEO in the large exchange has a chance of success.

nakata121

member

Activity: 574

Merit: 14

Quote from: whtchocla7e on September 17, 2019, 09:52:35 AM

Although IEO carries many risks, it is still much better than ICO. One thing for sure in IEO is the tight listing with the exchange, which gives investors peace of mind about the liquidity.

True as you said, ico, ieo and sto are the three methods carried out by project developers to sell their tokens so far, but of course the three methods have advantages and disadvantages of each, so if we compare between ico, ieo or sto, then ieo is a bit safer for us to invest in a project and of course with the existence of this IEo can again make developers more responsible in developing their tokens in market exchanger.

whtchocla7e

full member

Activity: 392

Merit: 116

Worlds Simplest Cryptocurrency Wallet

Although IEO carries many risks, it is still much better than ICO. One thing for sure in IEO is the tight listing with the exchange, which gives investors peace of mind about the liquidity.

sieemma

sr. member

Activity: 980

Merit: 253

IEOs aren't bad in the sense that the risk of people not getting what they have paid for is reduced and also coins get automatically listed on the exchange that is doing the IEO which is by far better than icos where the team would have to request for listing for another waiting months.

Ben Shedly

member

Activity: 242

Merit: 10

CurioInvest [IEO Live]

I do not believe IEO after several failures. Major exchanges specifically inflated the price of new projects to attract new fools. Small exchange often cheat their investors and not to give them money.
So it turns out that one way or another all the IEO is based on deception, and it's not the best place to make money.

JesonJames

newbie

Activity: 114

Merit: 0

Quote from: seanskie18 on September 17, 2019, 08:03:21 AM

IEO's not bad all the time, but it is risky investment. However, IEO is better than ICO because it is more attractive to investors and it is very good on raising money to the project. If the IEO will be joined to the top exchanges, I'm pretty sure that investors will gain a lot of profits.

Even though we all know IEO investment is a risky one just like ICO. But the main problem in this system is that most often projects that want to do IEO on certain exchanges outside of the top 3, they get rekt because all the other exchanges use a lot of fake volumes to be on CMC's top list and their IEO fees are so high that we have seen many projects have been destroyed by paying those fees and end up collecting less than 10% of their target amount.

valuater

sr. member

Activity: 1162

Merit: 252

for those who are registered on a small launchpad I think a lot is bad it's just for a large launchpad for example binance, houbi, bitforex or others I feel safe so if you want to follow ieo I think it's better to just focus on big launchpad.

seanskie18

full member

Activity: 391

Merit: 100

SOL.BIOKRIPT.COM

IEO's not bad all the time, but it is risky investment. However, IEO is better than ICO because it is more attractive to investors and it is very good on raising money to the project. If the IEO will be joined to the top exchanges, I'm pretty sure that investors will gain a lot of profits.

slashz9

full member

Activity: 1554

Merit: 101

if you compare it with ICO at this time IEO is better, both of them maybe can attrac people but ico has more potential to scam other.
but IEO can also make rekt people, while it hit market, the price is drop faster,not all market provide good ieo.
and for now IEO already less desirable, will ICO will take it back? or another way for collect money for fund raising a project Roll Eyes

mr-coin

jr. member

Activity: 35

Merit: 1

We shouldn't think about exchange rather than the project. This bad idea, and not good way to invest, big exchange gives the project trust, many go to invest due to this project for example in binance, and forget to research about the project.

zabir.brutov

jr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 2

If they are taking place on a good exchange then no, they could be very profitable. But if they are taking place on an exchange outside from top 10, you can just forget about your money, because they are ending without any success.

mr_random

legendary

Activity: 1344

Merit: 1001

Quote from: FelippeHeinz on September 16, 2019, 05:40:01 PM

IEO's are much safer than ICO's, especially if done in a good exchange. Exchanges have an image to watch out for, they can't make the mistake of approving bad or scam projects.

The reputable exchanges also want to list the good coins than wasting time with the shitcoin projects. Developers also understand the key facts, they must improve their business idea for listing on the Binance IEO. The big exchanges don't want to list the useless projects, I also agree with their management at this point. Approving bad projects will raise some questions by the social media users(investors) regarding the bad reputation and delisting requests will appear sooner or later. If we compare the IEOs on different exchanges it becomes simple choosing the low reward IEOs. Investors worry about investing in the IEO because there is no guarantee which projects will worth to invest. The low reward IEOs have to be reinstated if the team want to fascinate more investors to the project.

Topic: Are IEO's bad? - page 4. (Read 14478 times)