Topic: Are terrorists only muslim in religion? - page 23. (Read 42444 times)

During the past 5,000 years no more than a dozen people have been killed for cow slaughter. On the other hand, during this period hundreds of millions were slaughtered by the Muslims for refusing to convert to Islam.

I don't know Muslim countries which would Sharia law. Yes indeed, there are areas in which these practices are strong, but in General it is not. Just in poor Muslim countries there is no other way to earn money in addition to terrorism. And religion is for the second time.

Yes, in today's world hinduism is the most peaceful religion because its followers kill people who eat beef.So there is no doubt about that.
[/quote]
Cow is worshipped by hindus.
check this https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamadhenu
if some one beheads statue of jesus he will deserve a very harsh death here some one is killing live god. So they deserve to be punished. And in hindu countries beef is banned its sold illegally so punishment is entertained.
But better thing is people go legally and not kill some one like muslims would have done if same was done with their god.

All the religious Muslims are bound to follow the teachings of their holy book. If they don't do that, then they will be termed as apostates, and will be beheaded by the sharia courts. The only method in which a Muslim can completely sever his links with terrorism is to renounce Islam and convert to more peaceful religions such as Buddhism and Hinduism.

Very interesting comments. Thank you.

what are you going to do with terrorist that are people?
we will eradicate duck terrorists rabbit terrorist but what about terrorist people?

After all that I knew or learned after a long conversation, then the opinion is not unique to me. Of course terrorism must be eradicated, but not the whole people.

First terorist are not right in the head.

Secondary religion is not for the stupid ones.

I think my opinion about muslims have changed now.All muslims are not bad and cannot be terrorists. Might be major bulk of terrorists is constituted by muslims but by that thing we cant blame all muslims to be of that category.
Why do we categorise people as muslims??Because they follow islam.Why we call muslims terrorists?because they are one who follow islam which says to kill inocent for place in heaven...
But we cant call all muslims as terrorists because there might be some chunk of muslims who will not follow the wrong things taught by their holy book.
Our gita or you can say bible says always be honest and never speak false even in worst condition but in some circumstances we dont follow it.Its good but difficult to follow at all times.For muslims teachings of their holy book is bad and ofcourse difficult to follow.Because getting happiness by someones death wont be for all.
So those muslims who dont follow wrong teachings cant be said as terrorists.
But still can say one thing its better if they convert/not follow islam.I dont know whats exactly in islam being a non muslim but as far i know its teaching are not for betterment of society and so nature/our god doesnt like its followers.
But still my vote remains with all terrorists are muslims in religion eventhough all muslims are not terrorists because i dont think anyone could give evidence of terrorism by a hindu or christian.
Being in hindu country all terror attacts in my country till date are carried out only by muslims so opinion of all terrorists being muslims remains.And there is no teaching in our holy book something similar to islam like kill for place in heaven or triple talak...

I can say for a fact that not all terrorist are Muslims, they are people who just causes mayhem just because they like it, anarchist who like to kill people just for the fun of it and are not termed terrorist just because they are of different religion other than Islam and are of a white race.

Everything in the world should go slowly. Can Islam ever will understand it. But I think eventually all religion will cease to exist. It is impossible constantly to deceive people. Maybe then the wars will be less.

Which means what? Islam dumber? (serious question here. Why one and not the other?)

Islam was always spread through the use of violence and genocide. Earlier Christianity was also like that (Americas and Africa for example), but the Christian leaders later realized that this method is more harmful than beneficial.

Not all Muslims are religious fanatics who try to draw others into their religion, but there are very few such.

Very right point.And now time has come that to forcibly put up their beliefs on others they are becoming terrorists

The problem with these Muslims is that they are always wanting to force their beliefs on others. They are willing to wage war and kill to convert people. Mohammed and his associates spread Islam by conquest, accept Allah or die no wonder they choose Allah.

You still think that all Muslims to one bad people? Maybe some part of them should not be a bad person. Or is your opinion unshakable?

No surprise there. Wherever the Muslims live (it doesn't mater whether they are residing there for long time, or are recent immigrants), they create problems for the non-Muslims. This issue has become very serious after Saudi Arabia started using their petro-dollars to spread the Wahhabi ideology, starting from the 1980s.

It seems to me that things are not so simple. In addition to the fanaticism of the attacks need money and weapons. The simple fanatics and it's not available. It is well-managed troops. It's war of the worlds.

US dropped bomb on afghanistan/muslims/terrorists.
its the biggest non nuclear bomb.Read the new to know more about terrorism carried by muslims (who are now getting result now for their activities.)